IRCloggy #git 2017-09-19

Logs Search ←Prev date Next date→ Channels Documentation

Provider of IRC logs since 2005.
WARNING: As Freenode became unjoinable and lost all warnings in topics, we cannot log channels on Freenode anymore.

2017-09-19

jrabe left00:00
jrabe joined00:00
parsnip /9/900:00
fahadash left00:00
rorro left00:04
roelmonnens joined00:05
steeze left00:06
a3Dman joined00:07
ahr3n left00:08
gugah left00:09
roelmonnens left00:09
jeffripke joined00:15
brent__ left00:16
mr_sm1th joined00:17
brent__ joined00:18
roelmonnens joined00:19
Guest3590 joined00:19
a3Dman left00:20
mikecmpbll left00:21
nettoweb__ left00:23
bronson joined00:23
acidjnk left00:23
roelmonnens left00:23
brent__ left00:23
dreiss left00:26
jeffripke left00:26
justanotheruser joined00:27
bronson left00:27
a3Dman joined00:28
Tobbi joined00:30
ahr3n joined00:33
jeffripke joined00:33
watabou joined00:34
evulish left00:36
a3Dman left00:36
mizu_no_oto left00:37
jeffripke left00:37
torshido left00:38
rewt left00:39
m0viefreak left00:40
josuedhg joined00:41
magicturtle joined00:42
renarc joined00:42
Mattiaslndstrm left00:43
Tobbi left00:43
mizu_no_oto joined00:44
igemnace left00:46
surfist joined00:46
iamthad left00:46
durham_ joined00:46
cbonobo left00:48
josuedhg left00:48
durham left00:50
Cabanossi left00:50
Peppernrino left00:50
Cabanossi joined00:51
durham_ left00:51
gugah joined00:52
durham joined00:53
igemnace joined00:53
Gustavo6046 left00:55
iamthad joined00:56
jeffripke joined00:58
steeze joined00:58
salamanderrake left00:58
ti2 left00:58
gugah left00:59
CheckDavid left00:59
acidvegas joined01:00
gugah joined01:00
acidvegas left01:00
Sasazuka left01:01
acidvegas joined01:01
iamthad left01:01
acidvegas <-01:01
iamthad joined01:01
acidvegas left01:02
jeffripke left01:02
fuzzmz left01:02
venmx joined01:03
venmx_ joined01:03
Nizumzen joined01:05
ArcaTech left01:05
finalbeta joined01:06
d^sh left01:06
venmx_ left01:08
venmx left01:08
courrier___ joined01:08
Nizumzen left01:08
d^sh joined01:08
Oatmeal left01:09
fuzzmz joined01:10
courrier__ left01:11
Mattiaslndstrm joined01:11
brent__ joined01:13
svm_invictvs left01:13
brent__ left01:13
brent__ joined01:13
ArcaTech joined01:14
rewt joined01:16
justanotheruser left01:18
justanotheruser joined01:18
brent__ left01:19
roelmonnens joined01:20
Mattiaslndstrm left01:20
rtjure left01:21
courrier____ joined01:22
roelmonnens left01:24
SideFX left01:24
courrier___ left01:25
Locra joined01:25
sunri5e left01:25
rtjure joined01:26
Murr left01:27
lb1c left01:27
Murr joined01:27
mizu_no_oto left01:30
tubaman left01:30
gopar left01:30
lb1c joined01:30
mr_sm1th left01:31
cdg joined01:31
sunri5e joined01:31
Locra left01:32
joeco joined01:32
durham left01:33
Cabanossi left01:34
Kaisyu joined01:35
Cabanossi joined01:36
Mattiaslndstrm joined01:37
Guest3590 left01:38
tarkus left01:41
hfu joined01:44
durham joined01:45
ilbot3 left01:45
Oatmeal joined01:45
Mattiaslndstrm left01:46
hfu_ joined01:47
neightchan joined01:48
hfu left01:49
xaxxon joined01:51
str_ left01:52
cdown joined01:54
hfu_ left01:54
ilbot3 joined01:55
neightchan left01:56
nettoweb__ joined01:57
Mattiaslndstrm joined01:57
ArcaTech left02:01
Peng_ joined02:01
evulish joined02:01
stutter joined02:03
nettoweb__ left02:03
jeffripke joined02:03
joeco left02:06
hfu joined02:08
jeffripke left02:12
ForeignBiscuit joined02:13
ForeignBiscuit left02:13
ForeignBiscuit joined02:13
Mattiaslndstrm left02:16
ResidentBiscuit left02:16
peepsalot left02:16
dmcpacman02:18
pacmannamcap02:18
mkali joined02:18
sangymakepkg02:18
makepkgsangy02:19
wxg joined02:22
Nizumzen joined02:23
bronson joined02:23
dunpeal joined02:26
raijin left02:26
dunpeal Hey. On github, I approved a pull request, when it should instead be resolved as "request changes". Is there a way to switch the resolution?02:27
rewt that sounds more like a !github question02:27
gitinfo Note that github != git. Feel free to ask us about Github-specific features (Forks, Pull Requests, Wikis, etc), but there are no guarantees. There is a #github channel, which might help too (again, no guarantees)02:27
lafleurdubien left02:28
dunpeal rewt: yup, already asked there, seemed dead.02:28
bronson left02:28
dunpeal FWIW, I believe the answer is "no", which is a bit strange.02:28
Since one could easily approve instead of reject a PR, and the implications are quite serious.02:29
easily *mistakenly02:29
akushner___ left02:32
vrishab left02:33
nettoweb__ joined02:33
mkali left02:33
nettoweb__ left02:34
namcapdmc02:34
gugah left02:34
cdg left02:35
chachasmooth joined02:35
chachasmooth_ left02:35
surfist left02:36
durham left02:37
lagothri1 joined02:37
Vortex35 joined02:37
dmcgit02:39
lagothrix left02:40
durham joined02:40
Vortex34 left02:41
jeffripke joined02:43
clickjack joined02:45
ArcaTech joined02:46
cdown_ joined02:47
frsk left02:48
Achylles left02:49
cdown left02:49
cdown_cdown02:49
jeffripke left02:49
thinkdoge left02:51
raijin joined02:52
Guest51185 joined02:52
pijiu joined02:53
jakogut_ left02:53
durham left02:55
wxg left02:56
pks left03:00
MACscr left03:01
brent__ joined03:02
venmx joined03:04
venmx_ joined03:04
pks joined03:04
Motoko joined03:05
CssNoOb joined03:06
belmoussaoui left03:07
CssNoOb left03:07
brent__ left03:07
CssNoOb joined03:07
tunekey joined03:08
CssNoOb left03:08
venmx left03:09
safe joined03:09
CssNoOb joined03:09
venmx_ left03:09
jeffreylevesque joined03:11
belmoussaoui joined03:11
bongozig left03:13
TikityTik joined03:15
fstd_ joined03:16
fstd left03:16
fstd_fstd03:16
magictits joined03:18
danslo joined03:18
magicturtle left03:19
MattMaker left03:19
MattMaker joined03:20
ArcaTech left03:21
hfu left03:21
danslo left03:23
Cumulo741 left03:24
xaxxon left03:24
peepsalot joined03:24
orbyt_ joined03:25
akushner___ joined03:26
surfist joined03:27
Murr left03:27
Murr joined03:27
Guest3590 joined03:28
courrier_____ joined03:29
sarbs joined03:29
hfu joined03:32
robotroll joined03:32
courrier____ left03:32
nd- joined03:32
Cabanossi left03:34
Cabanossi joined03:35
Noldorin left03:36
gableroux left03:36
vrishab joined03:36
nd left03:36
gableroux joined03:37
gableroux left03:37
howdoi joined03:38
Guest51185 left03:39
h12o joined03:41
hahuang65 left03:44
frsk joined03:45
Guest3590 left03:49
svm_invictvs joined03:51
robotroll left03:53
courrier______ joined03:53
Elon_Satoshi left03:56
CssNoOb left03:56
courrier_____ left03:57
clickjack left03:57
h12o left03:57
Elon_Satoshi joined03:59
h12o joined03:59
dsdeiz left04:00
dsdeiz joined04:00
dsdeiz left04:00
dsdeiz joined04:00
h12o left04:01
svm_invictvs left04:03
roelmonnens joined04:04
courrier_______ joined04:04
jeffripke joined04:05
courrier______ left04:08
roelmonnens left04:08
e^1 joined04:08
h12o joined04:08
hfu left04:08
robotroll joined04:10
jeffripke left04:11
h12o left04:11
v4ult left04:14
h12o joined04:15
piremi joined04:20
robotroll left04:20
cdown left04:22
h12o left04:23
hfu joined04:23
dviola left04:24
bronson joined04:25
Guest3590 joined04:25
v4ult joined04:27
gableroux joined04:29
basiclaser left04:29
cagomez joined04:29
bronson left04:29
_ikke_ dunpeal: You can also ask github support itself04:30
RandomUser4321 joined04:31
atesc joined04:31
kculpis left04:32
ShekharReddy joined04:32
dunpeal _ikke_: yeah, maybe I should.04:32
kaldoran left04:32
renarc left04:33
sim590 left04:33
cagomez left04:33
TikityTik left04:33
cdg joined04:35
cagedwisdom left04:36
RandomUser4321 left04:36
govg joined04:37
Elon_Satoshi left04:37
cdg left04:40
hahuang65 joined04:41
timofonic joined04:43
timofonic Hello04:43
Elon_Satoshi joined04:43
dsdeiz left04:43
dsdeiz joined04:43
dsdeiz left04:43
dsdeiz joined04:43
timofonic Anyone has idea about what may happen in this issue? I'm unable to copy the submodules there. Can anyone look at it? Please https://github.com/Argon-/mpv-config/issues/1204:45
_ikke_ timofonic: Let me take a look04:46
timofonic _ikke_: Thanks!04:46
hahuang65 left04:46
jceb joined04:46
timofonic _ikke_: Feel free to comment in GitHub too, I'm just a mere user with zero programming knowledge :P04:47
rkta_ joined04:47
justan0theruser joined04:48
_ikke_ timofonic: I'm not familiar with that repo, so can you explain what is not working?04:48
Cabanossi left04:48
cagedwisdom joined04:48
justan0theruser left04:49
_ikke_ timofonic: Are you saying that the submodules are not populated?04:49
timofonic _ikke_: Oh yes. The bold letters means those files are wrong in some reason. 1. empty directory. 2. Dead redirection04:49
orbyt_ left04:49
timofonic _ikke_: Yes, that whay I mean...04:49
freimatz joined04:50
_ikke_ ok04:50
justan0theruser joined04:50
rkta left04:50
rkta_rkta04:50
ArcaTech joined04:50
Cabanossi joined04:50
svm_invictvs joined04:50
justanotheruser left04:50
Lyqyd left04:51
sarbs left04:51
_ikke_ timofonic: I see, the .gitmodules file is missing04:51
in the repo04:51
So git has no idea where to clone these repos from04:51
TikityTik joined04:52
fatihgenc joined04:52
Guest51185 joined04:52
timofonic _ikke_: So. I'm somewhat happy and unhappy it's not my fault. Would you like to reply about that? Please think about it. A dev will be more trustworthy than a random user :P04:52
_ikke_ Yes, I'm about to do that04:52
Aeterne joined04:53
_ikke_ done04:54
sim590 joined04:55
kaldoran joined04:56
atesc left04:58
parsnip _ikke_: ooh, ledger-dashboard. is that mobile-friendly? shouldn't be too tricky to add a flask login i suppose.04:58
Anja left04:58
parsnip oh, you're on #ledger04:59
hahuang65 joined04:59
_ikke_ parsnip: It should be mobile friendly04:59
a3Dman joined05:01
a3Dman left05:01
a3Dman joined05:01
v4ult left05:02
thierryp left05:03
thierryp joined05:03
thierryp left05:03
Elon_Satoshi left05:04
Nizumzen left05:04
venmx joined05:05
venmx_ joined05:05
pbandark left05:07
a3Dman left05:08
cqi joined05:08
venmx_ left05:10
snowkidind left05:10
venmx left05:10
Anja joined05:12
tarkus joined05:12
a3Dman joined05:14
roelmonnens joined05:14
ashpokemonZ joined05:15
Bock joined05:17
TikityTik left05:17
roelmonnens left05:18
Codaraxis joined05:19
timofonic _ikke_: Thanks a lot for your reply!05:20
renarc joined05:20
olga joined05:22
igmp left05:23
safe left05:24
justanotheruser joined05:24
olalonde left05:25
justan0theruser left05:26
hfu left05:27
Murr left05:27
imack joined05:27
Murr joined05:27
freimatz left05:28
justanotheruser left05:29
justanotheruser joined05:30
al-damiri left05:30
planigan left05:31
igmp joined05:31
ahr3n left05:32
Solvaring joined05:34
lss8_ joined05:35
xaxxon joined05:35
lss8 left05:38
hfu joined05:38
dsdeiz left05:39
edvb left05:39
madewokherd left05:40
dsdeiz joined05:40
dsdeiz left05:40
dsdeiz joined05:40
dre_ joined05:40
timofonic left05:41
hanna I wonder if it's possible somehow to get a four-way “diff of diffs” after a rebase operation? Imagine you have `A` as the ancestor and `B` deriving from it, and somebody updates A to A'. You now rebase B ontop of A', resulting in B', and want to compare the `diff A B` against the `diff A' B'`. Right now it seems like the only way is to literally run those two commands, save the diffs to a file, and then05:42
compare them side-by-side or something. But I wonder if there's a more principled solution05:42
Guest51185 left05:42
rkta left05:42
steeze left05:42
hanna if you just `diff B B'` you also get the changes from A vs A' in the diff output05:42
dre_ left05:43
glad joined05:44
steeze joined05:44
hanna Since rebasing is such a common operation in a snapshot-based VCS like `git`, it's a useful operation to make sure your B' still has all of the changes of B after a conflicting rebase05:45
steeze left05:45
planigan joined05:46
dege joined05:48
Cabanossi left05:48
Cabanossi joined05:50
ThomasLocke joined05:55
ThomasLocke left05:55
ThomasLocke joined05:55
freimatz joined05:55
courrier________ joined05:57
courrier_______ left06:01
Raging_Hog joined06:01
boombatower left06:02
venmx joined06:03
venmx_ joined06:03
Raging_Hog left06:05
ThomasLocke left06:05
howdoi left06:05
Peng_ left06:05
Kaisyu left06:05
xaa left06:05
netj left06:05
sphalerite left06:05
alcohol left06:05
SerusWork left06:05
nydel09 left06:05
kozy left06:05
stoopkid__ left06:05
catsup left06:05
tazle_ left06:05
Xiti left06:05
matoro left06:05
prg318 left06:05
Nothing4You left06:05
Kazuto left06:05
Hello71 left06:05
jimmyrcom left06:05
nixdork left06:05
Jackneilll left06:05
raffo left06:05
tchan left06:05
torarne left06:05
UncleCJ left06:05
primeos[m] left06:05
aidalgol left06:05
Tee_Pee left06:05
systmkor left06:05
Peetz0r left06:05
Olipro left06:05
nellicus_ left06:05
spacemud left06:05
Eugene left06:05
hagabaka left06:05
rideh- left06:05
nedbat left06:05
mquin left06:05
Kulrak left06:05
aspiers left06:05
sorenb left06:05
i7c left06:05
nioncode left06:05
Ploppz left06:05
brandonw left06:05
babilen left06:05
dmj` left06:05
souther left06:05
lukasdboer left06:05
rebrec left06:05
EvilJStoker left06:05
pepijndevos left06:05
diget left06:05
singlerider left06:05
thejoecarroll left06:05
nopacienc3 left06:05
mns left06:05
dogmatic69 left06:05
gkatsev left06:05
wloncom left06:05
Ownix left06:05
Shayan-To left06:05
AndrewGazelka left06:05
Nickeeh left06:05
argoneus left06:05
pmn left06:05
madknight left06:05
kba left06:05
Learath2 joined06:05
Kazuto joined06:05
babilen joined06:05
spm_draget joined06:05
Kazuto left06:05
Kazuto joined06:05
nixdork joined06:05
Nickeeh joined06:05
mns joined06:05
Peetz0r joined06:05
systmkor joined06:05
pmn joined06:05
Peng_ joined06:05
aspiers joined06:05
spb joined06:05
Nothing4You joined06:05
pepijndevos joined06:05
gkatsev joined06:05
rideh joined06:05
diget joined06:05
prg318 joined06:05
nellicus_ joined06:05
dogmatic69 joined06:05
errr_ joined06:05
wloncom joined06:05
lukasdboer joined06:05
raffo joined06:05
EvilJStoker joined06:05
Jackneilll joined06:05
nioncode joined06:05
biertie joined06:05
ahammond joined06:05
kba joined06:05
i7c joined06:05
mquin joined06:05
noahsussman joined06:05
janx joined06:05
spacemud joined06:05
thejoecarroll joined06:06
Shayan-To joined06:06
netj joined06:06
alcohol joined06:06
Olipro joined06:06
matoro joined06:06
brandonw joined06:06
SerusWork joined06:06
AndrewGazelka joined06:06
Hello71 joined06:06
Hobbyboy joined06:06
Ownix joined06:06
howdoi joined06:06
rfv joined06:06
Lowell joined06:06
barteks2x joined06:06
Kaisyu joined06:06
fcrick joined06:06
Eugene joined06:06
stoopkid__ joined06:06
ScalaWilliam joined06:06
Kulrak joined06:06
Kulrak left06:06
Kulrak joined06:06
johtso joined06:06
dmj` joined06:06
AlexanderS joined06:06
voiceftp joined06:06
Tee_Pee joined06:06
rscata joined06:06
demize joined06:07
unholycrab joined06:07
Meow-J joined06:07
hfu left06:07
igemnace left06:07
Travis-42 joined06:07
ashpokemonZ left06:07
jknetl joined06:07
fuzzmz left06:07
upperdeck left06:07
jeffripke joined06:07
venmx_ left06:08
hfu joined06:08
venmx left06:08
dec0n joined06:08
Whisket left06:08
dyce[m] left06:08
Cumulo741 joined06:08
Demos[m] left06:08
nappy[m] left06:08
sunri5e left06:08
Whisket joined06:08
olbat[m]1 left06:09
swalladge[m] left06:09
waltervargas[m] left06:09
ushaNg6i[m] left06:09
Techie[m] left06:09
dreadful[m] left06:09
reactormonk[m] left06:09
am2on left06:09
pvn[m] left06:09
flo[m] left06:09
Orbixx[m] left06:09
monomon[m] left06:09
colonelkrud[m] left06:09
patrickr[m] left06:09
Miguelngel[m] left06:09
cverna left06:09
JerkyMcJerkface[ left06:09
sanday[m] left06:09
hiq[m] left06:09
Guest38326 left06:09
yanbbyan left06:09
aviraldg left06:09
spinningarrow[m] left06:09
aspiers[m] left06:09
rigid left06:09
igemnace joined06:09
horpoppy[m] left06:09
abithvijayan[m] left06:09
ZyX-I joined06:09
acme[m] left06:09
Remramm left06:09
dikiaap left06:09
KevinMGranger left06:09
unclechu left06:09
osse hanna: i usually do git log -p A B and git log -p A' B' side by side and eye-ball it. It's *usually* good enough. I've had patch sets maintained in git, and looking at the diff of a diff isn't easy :P06:10
adamus1red left06:10
maxorator left06:10
pR0Ps left06:10
fuzzmz joined06:10
adamus1red joined06:10
grawity joined06:10
Raging_Hog joined06:10
ThomasLocke joined06:10
xaa joined06:10
nydel09 joined06:10
kozy joined06:10
catsup joined06:10
tazle_ joined06:10
Xiti joined06:10
jimmyrcom joined06:10
tchan joined06:10
hagabaka joined06:10
nedbat joined06:10
sorenb joined06:10
Ploppz joined06:10
nopacienc3 joined06:10
souther joined06:10
rebrec joined06:10
singlerider joined06:10
argoneus joined06:10
madknight joined06:10
ohcibi joined06:10
bittyx_ joined06:10
msev- joined06:10
LVK267 joined06:10
mani2 joined06:10
stutter left06:10
singlerider left06:11
hagabaka left06:11
kozy left06:11
Xiti left06:11
osse hanna: you can also compare the patch-id (man git-patch-id) but it's a bit fickle06:11
VladGh_ left06:11
gitinfo hanna: the git-patch-id manpage is available at https://gitirc.eu/git-patch-id.html06:11
dhollinger left06:11
rigid joined06:11
rigid left06:11
rigid joined06:11
voice_ftp joined06:11
Xiti joined06:11
hagabaka joined06:11
dhollinger joined06:11
Motoko left06:12
maxorator joined06:12
jeffripke left06:12
kozy joined06:12
singlerider joined06:12
voice_ftp left06:13
Guest3590 left06:13
brent__ joined06:14
sunri5e joined06:14
voice_ftp_ joined06:14
upperdeck joined06:14
JeroenT joined06:14
pR0Ps joined06:15
tarkus left06:15
voiceftp left06:15
jameser joined06:16
Guest3590 joined06:17
brent__ left06:18
acetakwas left06:19
zefferno joined06:19
Silmarilion joined06:20
CssNoOb joined06:20
roelmonnens joined06:20
sz0 joined06:22
ti2 joined06:22
ArcaTech left06:23
dreiss joined06:24
opencw joined06:25
bronson joined06:26
chele joined06:28
bronson left06:30
courrier________ left06:31
courrier________ joined06:31
VladGh joined06:32
tkore joined06:33
Cabanossi left06:34
jceb left06:34
Cabanossi joined06:35
schleppel joined06:38
cagedwisdom left06:38
robinsmidsrod left06:39
robinsmidsrod joined06:40
pyvpx_ left06:42
opalepatrick joined06:42
jameser left06:42
dreiss left06:42
luc4 joined06:43
thierryp joined06:44
wandering_vagran joined06:45
Sleepy63 left06:46
Sleepy63 joined06:46
jameser joined06:49
robinsmidsrod left06:50
cagedwisdom joined06:51
robinsmidsrod joined06:51
danslo joined06:51
thiago left06:54
ertes left06:55
npgm left06:58
Chulbul joined06:59
Chulbul how to deal with line ending issue, my server is linux and I'm working on windows machine, out of no where, there are files which shows all file changes in git commit because of line ending issue. How can I get rid of this, please guide.07:00
elsevero joined07:01
a3Dman left07:02
jceb joined07:03
MACscr joined07:03
Aeterne left07:04
luc4 left07:05
a3Dman joined07:05
roelmonn_ joined07:06
bybb joined07:06
luc4 joined07:06
Cumulo741 left07:07
CussBot left07:07
hs366 left07:07
hs366 joined07:08
jeffripke joined07:09
jast Chulbul: !crlf07:09
gitinfo Chulbul: to fix problems with line endings on different platforms, check out http://line-endings.gitrecipes.de/07:09
roelmonnens left07:09
elsevero left07:09
overlord_tm joined07:11
Nizumzen joined07:12
stylsi433 joined07:13
jeffripke left07:13
Chulbul jast: Ok, let me check07:15
j08nY joined07:15
dabura667 joined07:16
a3Dman left07:18
Dick_Hammer left07:18
jaggz left07:19
CussBot joined07:19
dave0x6d left07:19
wissy joined07:20
wissy left07:20
Chulbul jast: I treid git config --global core.autocrlf input from here https://help.github.com/articles/dealing-with-line-endings/#platform-linux but it didn't seem to work.07:20
And how to fix current file which shows all the changes? jast07:20
jast I don't recommend autocrlf, .gitattributes is a better approach because it's easier to propagate the settings to all people using the repo07:20
patrickr[m] joined07:20
a3Dman joined07:21
jast that said, if files have already been checked in with CRLF line endings (which isn't supposed to happen), both approaches will force you to re-commit affected files once07:21
xaxxon left07:22
BUSY left07:22
jast the difference is that when using .gitattributes and adding that to your repo, it's much more unlikely that the same thing will happen again. autocrlf depends on everyone activating that setting in their config. .gitattributes doesn't.07:22
raijin left07:23
jaggz joined07:23
Darcidride joined07:24
Chulbul jast: Ok, so you mean if I use this method and try to commit, that affected file will automatically be commited with right changes. Right?07:24
jast yep07:24
Chulbul sounds good jast07:24
jast you'll have the "every line is changed" thing once, but there's no way around that07:24
Chulbul Ok07:25
Is there any command to create, .gitattributes file. Windows not allowing me to create this file directly?07:25
ertes-w joined07:26
Murr left07:27
Murr joined07:27
Chulbul jast: I found it: type nul > .gitattributes07:27
ZyX-I left07:27
jungsubk joined07:27
bybb left07:28
Mement joined07:28
jast that's one way :) Windows can be a little picky sometimes with filenames07:28
bybb joined07:28
hfu left07:28
Mement This is my .gitignore: https://pastebin.com/WEusEeTE - However, /pub/media/.htaccess is not excluded and I can not commit the file, but I can commit /pub/.htaccess. How can I exclude it?07:29
Chulbul jast: Hey, inside this file I just added: text eol=lf , that's it right?07:29
jast Chulbul: unless you want to force your checked out files to have LF endings on Windows, you don't need the "eol=lf" part07:30
and .gitattributes works on patterns, so you need to tell it which files should have which attributes07:30
Chulbul I want it to be LF, because code on github is with LF. jast07:30
jast the *checked in* code with *always* be LF if you use the 'text' attribute07:31
for instance, if you put this line: *.py text07:31
that activates conversion for all .py files. they'll always be converted to LF when checking in, and your checked out files will have the native line endings for your local OS07:31
jungsubk left07:32
jast you can put a line for each pattern you want to activate conversion for (don't convert binary files like images, they'll break)07:32
Chulbul jast: Ok, I'm working in PHP, so I need to add *.php text eol=lf, right07:32
jast as I said, unless you need the checked out files to be LF, too, just '*.php text' is fine07:33
I don't know PHP that well. If PHP on Windows has issues with CRLF line endings, 'eol=lf' probably makes sense.07:33
Chulbul jast: but how to specify LF otherwise?07:33
yeah right07:33
thanks07:33
jast however, even without that, if you checkout the files on UNIX systems, they'll be converted to LF by default07:34
stylsi433 left07:34
jast conversely, you may want to force CRLF on checked out files sometimes, e.g. for Windows batch files, so you can use 'eol=crlf' for those. the checked in version will still use LF, though.07:35
CheckDavid joined07:35
cdg joined07:36
mar77i_ joined07:36
hfu joined07:36
mar77i left07:37
cdg left07:40
King_Hual joined07:41
King_Hual left07:41
King_Hual joined07:41
Dick_Hammer joined07:41
_ng joined07:42
j08nY left07:43
dsdeiz left07:45
dsdeiz joined07:46
dsdeiz left07:46
dsdeiz joined07:46
energizer left07:48
abba joined07:49
danslo left07:49
Dick_Hammer left07:50
hs366 left07:50
hs366 joined07:51
piremi left07:51
piremi joined07:52
danslo joined07:53
malmalmal joined07:54
aard_ joined07:54
piremi left07:54
mikecmpbll joined07:54
Raed|Mobile joined07:55
olbat[m] joined07:55
reactormonk[m] joined07:55
sanday[m] joined07:55
flo[m] joined07:55
cverna joined07:55
primeos[m] joined07:55
aspiers[m] joined07:55
UncleCJ joined07:55
nappy[m] joined07:55
spinningarrow[m] joined07:55
acme[m] joined07:55
hiq[m] joined07:55
dikiaap joined07:55
monomon[m] joined07:55
dyce[m] joined07:55
unclechu joined07:55
waltervargas[m] joined07:55
Demos[m] joined07:55
pvn[m] joined07:55
abithvijayan[m] joined07:55
Miguelngel[m] joined07:55
torarne joined07:55
horpoppy[m] joined07:55
Techie[m] joined07:55
aviraldg joined07:55
yanbbyan joined07:55
aidalgol joined07:55
Orbixx[m] joined07:55
sphalerite joined07:55
swalladge[m] joined07:55
dreadful[m] joined07:55
Guest3850 joined07:55
Remramm joined07:55
KevinMGranger joined07:55
am2on joined07:55
ushaNg6i[m] joined07:56
colonelkrud[m] joined07:56
JerkyMcJerkface[ joined07:56
saulll left07:57
TheVice joined07:57
TheVice left08:00
rorro joined08:01
bybb left08:03
venmx joined08:03
venmx_ joined08:03
sammyo left08:04
Dick_Hammer joined08:04
kurkale6ka joined08:05
govg left08:06
kurkale61 joined08:07
dcpc007 hi, to delete old commit useless (not pushed), can i git rebase -i and only remove thos 2 commit lines ?08:07
parsnip yes08:07
dcpc007 ok, think it was more complicated ... i have a supervision with night auto-commit08:08
and 2 days ago it add a temp file ...08:08
and yesterday i delete the file .. and another auto-commit :)))08:08
not really usefull in history08:08
dimi1947 joined08:08
venmx_ left08:08
venmx left08:08
dcpc007 (i should show this to my svn dev :) )08:09
lb1c left08:09
pbandark joined08:09
kurkale6ka left08:09
lb1c joined08:10
parsnip oh, i read that as "remove those two commits", might still be yes, but i have to imagine it now.08:10
how many commits is this temp file in?08:11
er, one commit commited the file?08:11
dcpc007 HEAD~4 = add temp and HEAD~2 = delete08:12
acidjnk joined08:12
dcpc007 then i rebase -i HEAD~5 and remove lines08:12
nothing more in the commits08:12
i already split other stuf08:12
parsnip and those commits don't add anything else?08:12
ah, nice08:13
dcpc007 i love git log --stats08:13
git log --stat (-s)08:13
masuberu joined08:14
magictits left08:15
magictits joined08:15
mescalinum joined08:16
ejsf left08:16
jsears joined08:16
ahrs left08:17
CssNoOb left08:17
ahrs joined08:18
Floflobel joined08:18
masuberu left08:20
BUSY joined08:20
sword left08:20
dimi1947 left08:21
zxd hey, if git add -A . adds subdirectories that are git repositories ( with .git ) as submodule should it not create a .gitmodules file ?08:24
rokups joined08:25
bronson joined08:27
Noodlewitt left08:27
nedbat left08:28
brent__ joined08:30
dre_ joined08:31
sz0 left08:31
bronson left08:32
migueltorrescost joined08:33
guardian left08:34
migueltorrescost left08:34
brent__ left08:34
kurkale61kurkale6ka08:34
PaulCapestany left08:35
guardian joined08:36
Vortex34 joined08:37
Vortex35 left08:38
zxd "git submodule init to initialize your local configuration file, and git submodule update to fetch all the data from that project and check out the appropriate commit listed in your superproject:" how do I see what commit is in the superproject08:38
exxi joined08:39
exxi when i am clonning a repo, all the branches are also clonned ? or only the master branch ?08:39
selckin all08:40
nedbat joined08:40
exxi selckin, cool08:40
hfu left08:41
cstratak joined08:42
achadwick joined08:42
TomyWork joined08:43
baxx joined08:44
r4w joined08:45
Solvaring left08:46
hfu joined08:49
SteffanW joined08:50
gitnamcap08:51
murii joined08:51
JeroenT_ joined08:52
r4w left08:52
cagomez joined08:53
czart_ joined08:54
hfu left08:54
JeroenT_ left08:54
hfu joined08:55
JeroenT_ joined08:55
freimatz left08:55
fatalhalt left08:55
JeroenT left08:56
D630 joined08:56
czart__ left08:57
cagomez left08:58
JeroenT_ left08:59
JeroenT joined08:59
manuelschneid3r joined09:00
cqi left09:02
luc4 left09:03
jknetl left09:04
phinxy joined09:04
phinxy left09:05
luc4 joined09:07
gurrkiin are 'git reset' and 'git reset --soft' the same?09:09
JeroenT left09:09
jeffripke joined09:10
_ikke_ gurrkiin: no, git reset == git reset --mixed09:10
gurrkiin yeah I actually just saw this part in the docs!09:10
jast gurrkiin: no. no option is the same as --mixed. the difference between --mixed and --soft is that --mixed resets the index and --soft doesn't.09:10
gurrkiin what exactly is the index?09:11
jast a.k.a. staging area09:11
i.e. reset --mixed unstages all changes09:11
gurrkiin what does git reset --soft do then?09:11
jast without any extra arguments, nothing :)09:11
_ikke_ It only touches branches09:11
gurrkiin ah okay09:12
_ikke_ git reset --soft HEAD~ moves the current branch back one commit, but the changes remain staged09:12
Guest3590 left09:12
jast reset changes what the current branch points to, but it defaults to HEAD (which resolves to the current commit, so it's a no-op)09:12
resetting to an old commit makes the newer commits disappear, and then --mixed and --soft do make a difference09:13
cagomez joined09:13
jast --hard = reset to old commit and update working tree and index to match09:13
--mixed = reset to old commit and update index to match but leave your current working tree09:13
zxd did they remove the --recursive option to git clone ? I don't see it in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-clone09:14
jast --soft = reset to old commit but leave working tree and index alone09:14
gurrkiin would (--soft HEAD~) be a good idea for amending a commit09:14
it almost seems like a hack09:14
jeffripke left09:14
gurrkiin instead of rebasing09:14
tobiasvl zxd: did it ever exist? do you mean --recurse-submodules ?09:14
jast zxd: --recurse-submodules09:14
gurrkiin: you could do that, but for amending the topmost commit you can just use 'git commit --amend' instead :)09:15
gurrkiin Ah, I thought that was just for the message09:15
good to know!09:15
jast no, it will use your current index, too09:15
if you haven't staged anything new, that's basically the same as before09:16
zxd it did exist :)09:17
jknetl joined09:17
cagomez left09:17
D630 left09:17
mkali joined09:18
JeroenT joined09:18
JeroenT left09:18
jast zxd: it's no longer documented because it's a little vague, but still works09:19
JeroenT joined09:19
kurkale61 joined09:19
zxd jast: it behaves the same it seems09:20
same thing09:20
jast yeah09:20
kurkale6ka left09:20
jast --recursive was hidden in favour of --recurse-submodules because people thought the original name wasn't descriptive enough, but it's still accepted as an alias09:21
_ikke_ mostly to not break scripts I guess09:22
SkyPatrol_ left09:23
jast or people's habits :)09:23
gxt joined09:23
zxd is there a way to automatically git clone --recurse-submodules and checkout master branch to track each submodule automatically?09:24
instead of having to cd to the submodule dir and git checkout master09:25
SkyPatrol joined09:25
dabura667 left09:25
zxd ah there is foreach09:25
here is a foreach submodule command to run some arbitrary command in each submodule.09:25
guardian left09:26
onla left09:27
Mement left09:28
kurkale6ka joined09:28
sergio left09:29
ppang joined09:30
svm_invictvs left09:30
Tobbi joined09:30
olivetree_ left09:30
kurkale61 left09:31
guardian joined09:31
chll_ joined09:37
JeroenT left09:38
ferr joined09:39
hfu left09:40
hfu joined09:40
malmalmal left09:41
JeroenT joined09:42
cdg joined09:43
Timvde left09:44
mkali left09:44
cdg_ joined09:45
cdg__ joined09:46
swift1 joined09:47
PaulCapestany joined09:48
cdg left09:48
Cabanossi left09:48
Timvde joined09:49
cdg_ left09:50
Cabanossi joined09:50
cdg__ left09:50
venmx joined09:52
venmx_ joined09:52
Raging_Hog left09:54
Raging_Hog joined09:54
hfu_ joined09:55
cdg joined09:57
hfu left09:57
cdg_ joined09:59
hfu_ left10:00
cdg__ joined10:01
cdg left10:01
chrfle joined10:01
chrfle left10:01
chrfle joined10:01
freimatz joined10:01
JeroenT left10:02
jknetl left10:02
chrfle- left10:03
exxi left10:04
exxi joined10:04
cdg_ left10:04
exxi left10:04
exxi joined10:04
JeroenT joined10:05
cdg__ left10:05
nettoweb__ joined10:06
nettoweb__ left10:11
JeroenT left10:11
guardian left10:11
jeffripke joined10:11
in1t3r_ left10:12
czart joined10:12
jsears left10:12
roelmonn_ left10:13
czart_ left10:13
roelmonnens joined10:13
roelmonnens left10:14
guardian joined10:14
roelmonnens joined10:14
jeffripke left10:16
jknetl joined10:16
a3Dman left10:16
Guest3590 joined10:17
olivetree_ joined10:18
Spydar007 left10:19
masuberu joined10:21
Guest3590 left10:21
King_Hual left10:24
sarri left10:24
matumbo left10:25
a3Dman joined10:25
sarri joined10:27
sarri left10:27
sarri joined10:27
e^1 left10:28
exxi left10:29
Spydar007 joined10:29
freddieptf joined10:30
exxi joined10:32
exxi left10:32
exxi joined10:32
e^1 joined10:32
Cabanossi left10:33
sarp joined10:34
Cabanossi joined10:35
jimmyrcom_ left10:37
piremi joined10:40
masuberu left10:41
mescalinum left10:42
JeroenT joined10:44
jeffreylevesque left10:44
piremi left10:44
dimi1947 joined10:46
opencw left10:46
sarp left10:46
theoceaniscool joined10:47
danslo left10:47
jameser left10:47
troyt left10:49
PHPanos joined10:49
opencw joined10:50
troyt joined10:51
in1t3r_ joined10:51
mescalinum joined10:51
danslo joined10:52
raynold left10:53
SteffanW left10:55
Borg- joined10:56
gitinfo set mode: +v10:56
dimi1947 left10:58
TheVice joined10:59
enkrypt left11:00
hfp_work left11:01
roelmonn_ joined11:01
in1t3r_ left11:02
sarp joined11:03
enkrypt joined11:03
Cabanossi left11:03
roelmonnens left11:05
Cabanossi joined11:05
hfp_work joined11:06
bongozig joined11:06
zaccanasta joined11:09
sz0 joined11:09
piremi joined11:09
jsears joined11:09
dave0x6d joined11:14
zaccanasta so I formatted all my project files with clang-format. After commiting I saw git copied an .h files to a different one in a different location. Something like copy src/{AAAA/xxx.h => BBBB/yyyy.h}11:14
problem is yyyy.h is the same file as before, just reformatted11:15
what's the meaning of that copy?11:15
bruce_lee joined11:16
bruce_lee left11:16
bruce_lee joined11:16
osse zaccanasta: is there still a file at the old path ?11:16
zaccanasta yeah all files are fine, project builds ok11:17
osse so it is a copy, then?11:17
rorro left11:17
zaccanasta for me it meand xxxx.h replaces yyyy.h11:17
*means11:17
southernirc joined11:18
osse but does both xxxx.h and yyyy.h exist at the moment ?11:18
zaccanasta they do11:18
osse so what's the confusion ?11:18
zaccanasta I diffed with masters, they are just formatted differentely by clang-format11:19
gableroux left11:19
osse does the diff also include a deletion ?11:19
zaccanasta my confusion is git output showed xxxx.h copied to yyyy.h11:19
AfroThundr left11:19
zaccanasta no deletions, some files have been rewritten, this one has been copied to enother location11:20
but everything seems ok11:20
osse this is all a heuristic, and maybe that fails in this case... Git *thinks* you've copied one file, since two files are so similar11:21
no big deal11:21
zaccanasta but they are very different and in different directories11:21
ski7777 left11:21
zaccanasta and the copy didn't actually happen11:22
anyway, just my curiosity11:22
zulutango joined11:22
osse if you run git diff --no-find-renames ... then it should make more sense11:22
jeffreylevesque joined11:24
zaccanasta in git diff there's nothing that's been renamed11:25
it was the output of git commit11:25
konsolebox left11:26
jameser joined11:26
osse ah11:26
konsolebox joined11:27
Murr left11:27
osse well, anyway, the point is that it's a guess from git11:27
Murr joined11:27
Cavallari joined11:27
zaccanasta so I saw that copy in the output and I was confused11:27
but nothing has actually been copied11:28
osse you should reproduce it with 'git diff --find-renames --stat HEAD~1 HEAD'11:28
and you can adjust the threshold for what git thinks is a rename/copy/etc.11:28
as long as there are no new files before and after clang-format, everything is good11:29
h12o joined11:31
zaccanasta osse: thanks a lot11:32
Cabanossi left11:34
Cabanossi joined11:35
h12o left11:35
Tobbi left11:36
nowhereman left11:36
nettoweb__ joined11:36
nowhereman joined11:37
obacht-heiss joined11:37
Tobbi joined11:38
JeroenT left11:43
jripke74 joined11:44
masuberu joined11:44
scottjl left11:45
scottjl joined11:49
Raedism joined11:50
Cavallari1 joined11:51
ShalokShalom_ joined11:52
oskarkv left11:52
Raed|Mobile left11:52
Cavallari left11:52
Cavallari1Cavallari11:52
dre_ left11:53
ShalokShalom left11:55
JeroenT joined11:55
nettoweb__ left11:55
pix9 left11:55
lohfu left11:55
lohfu joined11:56
ski7777 joined11:57
TheVice left11:59
synthroid joined12:01
ShalokShalom_ShalokShalom12:02
Cabanossi left12:03
jripke74 left12:04
BUSY left12:04
BUSY joined12:05
Cabanossi joined12:05
Floflobel left12:06
VladGh left12:07
jripke74 joined12:07
PHPanos left12:07
VladGh joined12:08
feodaron joined12:10
sarp left12:11
jripke74 left12:12
YuGiOhJCJ joined12:13
colona_ left12:14
a3Dman left12:16
danslo left12:18
tvw joined12:19
manuelschneid3r left12:20
cverna left12:20
cverna joined12:20
Guest51185 joined12:21
manuelschneid3r joined12:21
voice_ftp_ left12:23
Raed|Mobile joined12:23
voiceftp joined12:23
jameser left12:26
Guest51185 left12:26
jameser_ joined12:26
Raedism left12:26
colona joined12:27
Raed|Mobile left12:27
tmsmith joined12:28
bronson joined12:29
brent__ joined12:30
voiceftp left12:31
voiceftp joined12:31
jameser_ left12:31
Cabanossi left12:32
renarc left12:33
jameser joined12:33
CheckDavid left12:33
bronson left12:34
nettoweb__ joined12:34
PHPanos joined12:34
brent__ left12:34
Cabanossi joined12:35
gableroux joined12:36
gableroux left12:37
Noodlewitt joined12:38
gableroux joined12:38
Guest3590 joined12:38
a3Dman joined12:38
zaccanasta left12:39
cagedwisdom left12:40
finalbeta left12:41
finalbeta joined12:41
nettoweb__ left12:41
gableroux left12:42
Acerific joined12:42
Acerific left12:42
Acerific joined12:42
jameser left12:43
gableroux joined12:45
plasticle left12:46
sobersabre joined12:46
nettoweb__ joined12:47
freimatz left12:48
Noodlewitt left12:48
Acerific left12:50
nettoweb__ left12:50
jungsubk joined12:50
nettoweb__ joined12:51
jameser joined12:51
Guest3590 left12:51
freimatz joined12:51
Guest34710 left12:52
neil_cn left12:53
Guest3590 joined12:55
nettoweb__ left12:55
Budyn joined12:58
tmsmith left12:58
stutter joined13:00
jameser left13:00
hfu joined13:01
jameser joined13:02
str_ joined13:02
bsanford left13:02
theoceaniscool left13:02
Nizumzen left13:03
bybb joined13:04
stutter left13:04
zxd is there an equivalent of git clone --recurse-submodules but for git pull ? so it will auto fetch and initalize new submodules added to the superproject?13:04
nettoweb__ joined13:05
_ikke_ zxd: the same option13:05
Odaym joined13:05
Odaym hi fellas13:05
nettoweb__ left13:06
theoceaniscool joined13:06
Odaym how can I make branch B become master?13:06
or have master point to branch B?13:06
grawity by renaming it13:06
Odaym to master??13:07
nettoweb__ joined13:07
Odaym heresy13:07
jast well, then maybe you meant something slightly different? :)13:07
grawity well that's literally the only difference13:07
s17 merge it13:07
jast do you want to have B checked out by default instead of master?13:07
when cloning, that is13:07
Odaym that branch is way ahead, and there are tons of conflicts of course back at master13:07
cdg joined13:07
giraffe joined13:08
Odaym i think i should check for conflicts first, merge is the natural way to do this13:08
_ikke_ If you're not on master: git branch -f master <branch>13:08
jast so you basically don't care about the version currently in master?13:08
giraffeGuest43113:08
Odaym yea i dont care for anything in master anymore13:08
cdg left13:08
jast I wouldn't forcibly overwrite master13:08
Odaym went out of sync long time ago and I just stuck with this new branch13:08
jast unless you're the only one on the project13:08
cdg joined13:08
Odaym I am13:08
let me try a normal merge13:08
jast okay, then there are two ways13:08
1) overwrite the history (and content) of master to match what's in B13:09
nettoweb__ left13:09
hfu left13:09
jast 2) do a magical merge that brings in all the history of B but finagle it so that the merge results in content identical to what's in B right now13:09
Odaym finagling is not my trade13:09
jast since nobody else is collaborating with you it's only a matter of taste13:09
it's not literal finagling, fortunately13:10
basically you can start a merge and when it conflicts badly, tell it to just ignore all of that and use version X as is13:10
zxd _ikke_: but it dosen't do it13:10
cdg_ joined13:11
jast but if you don't care about the old master, overwriting it will do the job, too. if you have B checked out, _ikke_'s command will do it. if master is checked out, this discards all uncommitted changes and overwrites master's history with B: git reset --hard B13:11
nettoweb__ joined13:11
_ikke_ zxd: Right, it does only update existing modules I read13:11
Odaym branch -f?13:12
jast yeah, that does it in the "master not checked out" case13:12
Odaym says here master is ahead of B by 213:13
i can reset hard on master13:13
and merge13:13
magictits left13:13
Odaym now it's at the moment when i created the new branch13:13
jast after the hard reset, there's nothing left to merge :)13:13
plasticle joined13:13
Odaym no of course there is, the branch is still out there13:13
ah, conflicts13:13
jast well, if you didn't hard reset *to B*, then you're right13:13
Odaym oh13:13
lol13:13
cdg left13:14
Odaym oh wow13:14
magic13:14
jast we're full of that here ;)13:14
zxd _ikke_: yea13:14
jripke74 joined13:14
Odaym Your branch and 'origin/master' have diverged,13:14
and have 35 and 2 different commits each, respectively.13:14
jast of course, using reset this way is a little destructive, so caution is advised13:15
Odaym I did a push on B before checking out to master and doing that reset13:15
jast okay, now git recognizes that your old master (as of what the remote repo knew the last time you fetched) is quite different from your new master13:15
Odaym yes13:15
jast to force the new master to your remote repo, a simple 'git push -f origin master' should do13:15
this makes the destructive power spread ;)13:16
Odaym pull would reset what I DID13:16
oops did*13:16
jast not quite. it would try to merge the old master with the new master. but yeah, you'd get the same old conflicts again.13:16
Odaym alright, destruction achieved13:17
SkyPatrol_ joined13:17
jast yay!13:18
bsanford joined13:18
jripke74 left13:18
theoceaniscool left13:18
tunekey left13:19
SkyPatrol left13:19
Odaym ah damn13:20
maryo_ joined13:20
Odaym I had the note here in my Git Tips doc lol http://snpy.in/PG50sB13:20
probably from the last time I was here, but didn't actually execute it that time13:20
jast just goes to show that doing beats writing down :)13:21
Odaym haha13:21
yep13:21
Dasir joined13:21
dave0x6d left13:23
zxd what's the difference between git submodule update --remote --merge and git pull --recurse-submodules does the latter merge with the status of the submodule's remote tracking branch or it uses superproject’s recorded SHA-113:24
Noldorin joined13:24
snowkidind joined13:24
relipse__ joined13:25
jameser left13:26
malmalmal joined13:26
Murr left13:27
Murr joined13:27
diqidoq joined13:27
relipse___ joined13:27
FrostCandy joined13:29
relipse__ left13:30
h12o joined13:31
chrisshattuck joined13:32
jameser joined13:33
Budyn left13:35
h12o left13:36
v4ult joined13:36
gugah joined13:38
gugah left13:38
gugah joined13:38
chrisshattuck left13:39
stutter joined13:41
bybb left13:42
Diaoer joined13:43
Diaoer left13:44
dougquaid joined13:44
dougquaid Can a tag be applied to an old commit rather than the most current one?13:44
jast yep, it's just an extra optional argument13:45
Diaoer joined13:45
dougquaid What the is extra argument? I haven't found it yet in my searches13:46
a3Dman left13:47
jottr joined13:47
Cumulo741 joined13:50
Raging_Hog left13:51
jameser left13:51
jast git tag mytag abc12313:52
it's also the first synopsis line in man git-tag :)13:52
gitinfo the git-tag manpage is available at https://gitirc.eu/git-tag.html13:52
overlord_tm left13:53
zxd is it possible to set a timeout for --recurse-submodule to git clone so that if submodules are unreachable to not get stuck forever?13:54
justanotheruser left13:54
ForeignBiscuitResidentBiscuit13:54
h12o joined13:55
gonhidi joined13:55
zxd bah I see the whole clone fails if it can't connect13:55
a3Dman joined13:55
a3Dman left13:55
a3Dman joined13:55
dougquaid jast: Thanks13:55
Borg- the whole submodule thing..... I kinda dont like it... how they works..13:56
Es0teric joined13:56
Nizumzen joined13:56
Borg- for now I use super-project git repo.. with SH bootstrap script.. and git archive... works better for me..13:56
galaxie_ssh joined13:56
zxd ah actually it does clone without the submodule13:56
qqx left13:57
Borg- and if you need full repo of sub-project... just rm -rf it and do full clone.. removing info about sub-project..13:57
qqx joined13:57
zxd Borg-: it's easier to just commit information of new projects to the superproject!13:57
without having to manage manually with scripts each new project13:57
galaxie_ssh left13:57
e-dard joined13:57
e-dard left13:57
neunon left13:58
zxd the remote information13:58
neunon joined13:58
Borg- zxd: you mean with git submodules?13:58
zxd Borg-: yes13:58
sz0 left13:59
manuelschneid3r left13:59
Raed left13:59
Locra joined13:59
jameser joined13:59
Borg- I guess its personal preference... I feel it a bit counter-intuitive..13:59
maybe I need to try submodules harder.. one day13:59
dunno...13:59
dave0x6d joined14:00
jesst joined14:01
synthroid left14:01
jameser_ joined14:02
ferr left14:02
AnujSharma joined14:02
YuGiOhJCJ left14:03
jameser left14:03
chrfle^ joined14:04
malmalmal left14:04
damasceno joined14:05
chrfle left14:05
damasceno Hey guys, I'm adding "github/users/terraform.tfstate.backup" to my .gitignore but it's not working. When I do "git status --ignored" I can't see the file being ignored. Does anyone know how to do that?14:06
Argylelabcoat joined14:06
Raed joined14:07
torshido joined14:10
igemnace left14:11
aard_ left14:11
Lacro joined14:12
Lacro left14:12
osse damasceno: what does 'git log -- github/users/terraform.tfstate.backup' show ?14:13
TomyWork left14:15
AaronMT joined14:18
Odaym left14:18
cbonobo joined14:18
AnujSharma left14:18
cdown joined14:21
Khisanth left14:23
Dougie187 joined14:23
Khisanth joined14:24
noecc joined14:24
ecuanaso joined14:25
zulutango left14:25
bitmod left14:25
manuelschneid3r joined14:27
overlord_tm joined14:27
jesst left14:27
malmalmal joined14:29
feodaron left14:30
Guest3590 left14:30
bronson joined14:30
cdown_ joined14:32
baxx left14:32
fatihgenc left14:32
jameser_ left14:32
malmalmal left14:32
Guma left14:33
spacemeld left14:33
bergice_ joined14:34
cdown left14:34
cdown_cdown14:34
feodaron joined14:35
bronson left14:35
Mattiaslndstrm joined14:36
dreiss joined14:36
murii left14:37
urnix joined14:37
black_13 left14:37
nettoweb__ left14:38
Locra left14:38
jknetl left14:39
artem joined14:39
urnix left14:39
Mattiaslndstrm left14:40
thiago_ joined14:40
chrissha_ joined14:43
hroi joined14:44
Es0teric left14:45
re1 joined14:45
damasceno left14:45
artem left14:46
cha18 joined14:46
tmhind2 joined14:46
iNCoNFuN joined14:47
artem joined14:47
pinux joined14:47
TikityTik joined14:48
Chulbul left14:49
bitmod joined14:50
ppang left14:50
cdown left14:51
visual left14:52
tmhind2 left14:52
fahadash joined14:53
gwd joined14:54
pinux left14:55
hroi I have branch with some 3 commits at the beginning.14:55
I'd like to merge them with master and rebase the branch with master so that only the follow on commits will be left14:55
does this make sense?14:56
I.e. take first commits from a brand and apply them to master,14:56
*branch14:56
gwd I'm having a weird problem where if I execute git commands from another programm too quickly in succession, the commands sometimes error out with lock file contention14:57
hroi will rebase then realize that those are the same commits, or will they appear as empty commits14:57
gwd https://hastebin.com/lucawebino.sql14:57
osse hroi: it will realize14:57
jripke74 joined14:57
osse hroi: git checkout master; git cherry-pick foo bar baz; git rebase master branchname14:57
gwd (The brackets there are the arguments to git -- so it executes a checkout and a clean, then attempts to do an 'am' and it fails with lockfile contention)14:57
Dasir left14:58
synthroid joined14:58
chele left14:58
hroi osse, ok so I can cherry pick the commits I want,14:58
on master then rebase14:59
JeroenT left14:59
gwd Git doesn't exit while commands are still going on in the background, does it?14:59
howdoi left14:59
hroi osse, would it be enough to cherry pick commit number 3 on my branch, therefore bringing in the 1st and 2nd14:59
cdown joined14:59
visual joined15:00
Silmarilion left15:00
osse hroi: no15:00
cherry-pick takes individual commits15:00
rscata left15:00
osse hroi: i've written a script that makes this easier: https://github.com/Osse/git-scripts/blob/master/git-move15:01
sz0 joined15:01
Phylock joined15:01
jripke74 left15:01
freddieptf left15:01
osse hroi: also: yes, rebase will realize and therefor drop duplicate commits15:02
jost joined15:05
thierryp left15:05
Diaoer left15:05
relipse___ left15:06
roelmonn_ left15:06
relipse joined15:06
ThomasLocke left15:07
roelmonnens joined15:07
jripke74 joined15:07
lexvegas joined15:07
diqidoq left15:08
AaronMT left15:08
AaronMT_ joined15:08
cdown left15:08
dreiss left15:08
jripke74 left15:09
lexvegas Hi all, I'm trying to fetch from LocalRepo1 into LocalRepo2 by running "git fetch LocalRepo1Remote". My working directory is up to date, but none of the new objects were transferred to LocalRepo2. If I run "git fetch origin" I get the expected objects downloading. Is there some flag I'm missing to fetch all of the objects in the local copy of the repo?15:09
TomyLobo joined15:10
ecuanaso left15:11
thiago_ left15:11
akushner___ left15:11
roelmonnens left15:12
AaronMT_AaronMT15:12
imack left15:13
zefferno left15:13
boombatower joined15:14
Cavallari left15:15
Cavallari joined15:15
heym0e joined15:15
acidjnk2 joined15:15
mikecmpbll left15:16
steeze joined15:16
Gustavo6046 joined15:16
kculpis joined15:17
acidjnk left15:17
gugah left15:17
mikecmpbll joined15:17
ams__ joined15:20
Gustavo6046 left15:21
Gustavo6046 joined15:21
durham joined15:22
svm_invictvs joined15:24
bomb-on joined15:24
_kk22kk_ joined15:25
bitmod left15:25
imack joined15:25
bitmod joined15:25
roelmonnens joined15:26
Murr left15:27
igemnace joined15:27
Murr joined15:27
chrfle joined15:27
chrfle left15:27
chrfle joined15:27
Gustavo6046 left15:28
SteffanW joined15:29
chrfle^ left15:29
h12o left15:29
durham left15:30
Gustavo6046 joined15:30
osse lexvegas: by default git will share objects and whatnot between two local repos to save space15:30
maybe that15:30
durham joined15:30
osse 's messing it up15:30
Gustavo6046 left15:31
roelmonnens left15:31
Gustavo6046 joined15:31
iNCoNFuN left15:32
lexvegas osse, Yeah, that seems to be exactly what's happening. I haven't found any flags to disable that thouh.15:32
Locra joined15:32
lexvegas nor is it on the git fetch man page15:33
osse lexvegas: not sure if it can be done after the fact15:33
but git clone --no-local or git clone file://foo does the trick15:33
lexvegas hmm, yeah. I just had an existing repo and wanted to save bandwidth15:34
gugah joined15:35
lexvegas Thanks for confirming my suspicions though15:35
dreiss joined15:36
heym0e left15:36
lexvegas I did manage to work around it using the -t flag, but even then there was still a few things when I just did a normal fetch form origin15:36
SkyPatrol joined15:37
CheckDavid joined15:37
dimi1947 joined15:38
artem left15:38
SkyPatrol_ left15:39
shdw joined15:39
oojacoboo left15:40
PHPanos left15:41
Floflobel joined15:42
brent__ joined15:43
brent__ left15:43
brent__ joined15:43
durham left15:44
Kaisyu left15:44
imack left15:44
madewokherd joined15:44
h12o joined15:45
hroi after cherry picking my first 3 commits into master, I'm now rebase the branch with master15:46
I get... off course... errors like "No changes" when going through the rebase15:46
should I do git rebase -skip, to skip over those "no changes" rebase steps.15:47
?15:47
rkta joined15:47
ashpokemonZ joined15:47
Cabanossi left15:48
durham joined15:49
Cabanossi joined15:50
debakarroy2 joined15:52
dsdeiz_ joined15:52
debakarroy2 left15:52
jceb left15:53
lexvegas left15:54
debakarroy2 joined15:54
ashpokemonZ left15:54
h12o left15:55
cagomez joined15:55
dviola joined15:56
mike_oalian joined15:56
dsdeiz_ left15:57
ArcaTech joined15:57
nixjdm joined15:58
joelroa joined15:59
joelroa left15:59
Motoko joined16:00
masuberu left16:00
bomb-on left16:01
cdown joined16:02
_ng left16:03
Motoko left16:03
thiago joined16:03
bomb-on joined16:04
deltam left16:05
deltam joined16:05
orbyt_ joined16:06
xz joined16:06
SkyPatrol_ joined16:06
v4ult left16:07
xz hi there, we use gerrit in one of the project I work for. There is this workflow where people when enabling new hardware/new feature create so called 'recipes'. Recipe is set of git cherry-picks + optional wiki with further instructions on how to build and run the feature. For me that seems little cumbersome, I believe branches should be used instead. Does gerrit support branches? Are branches good solution to keep new features temporarily,16:08
as long as they are not merged?16:08
phluks joined16:08
SkyPatrol left16:08
kurkale61 joined16:09
mike_oalian left16:09
mike_oalian joined16:10
kurkale6ka left16:12
bomb-on left16:12
igemnace left16:13
kurkale6ka joined16:13
k999k joined16:14
h12o joined16:14
kurkale61 left16:16
hahuang65 left16:16
dreiss left16:17
thinkdoge joined16:18
Murii|linux joined16:18
h12o left16:19
morenoh149 joined16:24
cdown left16:24
k999k left16:24
_kk22kk_ left16:24
chrfle^ joined16:24
abba left16:25
Rodya_ joined16:25
chrfle left16:26
freimatz left16:26
SkyPatrol_ left16:29
h12o joined16:29
SkyPatrol joined16:30
guardian left16:31
energizer joined16:31
durham left16:31
bronson joined16:31
durham joined16:32
bomb-on joined16:32
rapha left16:33
thierryp joined16:34
bronson left16:36
durham left16:36
mike_oalian left16:38
mike_oalian joined16:38
Mattiaslndstrm joined16:39
cagomez left16:40
Cavallari left16:41
cagomez joined16:41
svm_invictvs left16:43
tang^ joined16:44
chrfle joined16:45
chrfle left16:45
chrfle joined16:45
jsears left16:45
luc4 left16:46
Rodya_ left16:46
chrfle^ left16:46
manuelschneid3r left16:47
oojacoboo joined16:47
manuelschneid3r joined16:48
cagomez left16:48
cagomez joined16:48
Cabanossi left16:49
freimatz joined16:49
xz left16:49
durham joined16:50
Cabanossi joined16:50
Achylles joined16:52
jottr left16:52
kurkale6ka left16:54
SkyPatrol_ joined16:57
guardian joined16:57
SteffanW left16:58
SkyPatrol left16:59
Locra left17:01
nixjdm left17:01
svm_invictvs joined17:01
fatalhalt joined17:07
cstratak left17:07
chll_ left17:08
SkyPatrol joined17:08
sz0 left17:09
thiago left17:09
sobersabre left17:10
ertes joined17:10
SkyPatrol_ left17:10
sobersabre joined17:12
Pyrogerg joined17:12
gxt left17:12
Floflobel left17:13
jungsubk left17:14
jungsubk joined17:14
gwd left17:14
nixjdm joined17:15
e-dard_afk joined17:15
e-dard_afke-dard17:15
jceb joined17:15
oojacoboo left17:16
Polylith joined17:17
oojacoboo joined17:21
hahuang65 joined17:22
hahuang65 left17:22
Floflobel joined17:22
cdown joined17:22
Lyberta joined17:22
Lyberta is https:// more secure than git://?17:23
dimi1947 left17:23
thiago joined17:24
Seveas yes17:24
git:// is unencrypted17:24
surfist left17:25
_ikke_ and unauthenticated17:26
Guest3590 joined17:26
_ikke_ it's meant for anonymous cloning of public repos17:26
phluks left17:26
cdown left17:26
Murr left17:27
xcm left17:27
Murr joined17:27
glad_ joined17:27
xcm joined17:28
glad left17:29
Guest3590 left17:30
Cabanossi left17:34
jungsubk left17:34
Cabanossi joined17:35
akushner___ joined17:35
opencw left17:36
jstimm left17:37
j08nY joined17:37
rtjure left17:38
j08nY left17:38
j08nY joined17:38
j08nY left17:39
causasui left17:39
causasui joined17:39
j08nY joined17:40
j08nY left17:41
dimi1947 joined17:41
j08nY joined17:41
rtjure joined17:42
surfist joined17:42
achadwick left17:44
orbyt_ left17:45
wootehfoot joined17:46
mikecmpbll left17:46
Es0teric joined17:47
torshido left17:47
jottr joined17:48
mescalinum left17:50
jceb left17:52
j08nY left17:52
e-darde-dard_afk17:53
glad_ left17:54
dimi1947 left17:56
akushner___ left17:58
Discovery joined17:58
Discovery left17:59
theoceaniscool joined18:00
manuelschneid3r left18:00
Argylelabcoat left18:01
ArcaTech left18:01
nixjdm left18:01
mescalinum joined18:02
Floflobel left18:03
dcpc007 left18:03
akushner___ joined18:05
salamanderrake joined18:05
paul424 joined18:06
cdown joined18:06
phluks joined18:07
abyx joined18:07
jceb joined18:08
dsdeiz_ joined18:08
rkta left18:09
belmoussaoui left18:10
bomb-on left18:10
Rodya_ joined18:10
madewokherd left18:11
dsdeiz_ left18:13
Sasazuka joined18:14
nixjdm joined18:14
akushner___ left18:15
debakarroy2 left18:15
Rodya_ left18:15
jottr left18:15
akushner___ joined18:17
jungsubk joined18:17
e-dard_afke-dard18:18
PHPanos joined18:18
e-dard left18:19
Anja left18:19
gableroux left18:22
belmoussaoui joined18:23
diogenese left18:24
rtjure left18:24
diogenese joined18:25
steeze left18:26
aboccia joined18:27
ShekharReddy left18:29
sobersabre_ joined18:30
jungsubk left18:30
h12o left18:30
Bock left18:31
anderson_ joined18:32
anderson_ left18:32
cdg joined18:32
sobersabre left18:32
bronson joined18:32
jungsubk joined18:34
jleclanche left18:34
cdg_ left18:35
jstimm joined18:35
cdg left18:36
pbandark left18:36
bronson left18:37
kus_ubuntui686 joined18:37
kus_ubuntui686 left18:37
Mighty_Warthog joined18:39
Murii|linux left18:39
wandering_vagran left18:40
Mighty_Warthog left18:41
Mighty_Warthog joined18:41
Mighty_Warthog left18:41
hahuang65 joined18:42
manuelschneid3r joined18:42
sobersabre joined18:45
h12o joined18:47
sobersabre_ left18:47
ivo_ joined18:47
majuk joined18:52
bitmod left18:54
TikityTik left18:54
akushner___ left18:54
majuk Hey all. I'm having trouble generating/applying a patch file and I'm hoping someone can point out what I've done wrong. I git clone'd u-boot-fslc 2016.07, made edits to two files, and run 'git diff > patchfile.patch'. result -> https://pastebin.com/syczzFR418:55
mescalinum left18:55
majuk When I try to apply the patch to a newly cloned source, it tells me the patch does not apply.18:55
tvw left18:55
majuk https://pastebin.com/eAxcnZdJ18:56
sbeyer joined18:58
thiago majuk: your patch failed18:59
Rodya_ joined18:59
majuk Yup18:59
thiago the code has changed18:59
fix the conflict18:59
mescalinum joined18:59
Rodya_ left19:00
desnudopenguino joined19:00
johnnyfive left19:00
majuk I literally cloned, edited and generated the patch in the last 30 minutes.19:00
thiago show me the *git* commands19:01
nixjdm left19:01
thiago not quilt19:01
desnudopenguino are there any issues with merging a master branch to a different branch to test the different branch with changes in master, then once it is ready merge the different branch into master for deployment?19:02
thiago desnudopenguino: no, you can merge any two (or more) branches19:02
johnnyfive joined19:02
desnudopenguino ok, cool. my client just brought in some more devs, and their master branch has some additional stuff, but my branch isn't ready to be pushed, but I want to make sure things are still compatible between what I have and what they did19:04
majuk thiago: Yea, it's run through Yocto. Anyway, thanks for your input.19:04
jottr joined19:04
thiago majuk: you're definitely not applying the patch to the same sources19:04
majuk: I don't know what bitbake or quilt do to your sources. But they did something.19:05
majuk: that's your issue19:05
desnudopenguino: and if you don't push that change, you can always undo the merge and leave it for later19:05
desnudopenguino nice19:06
YuGiOhJCJ joined19:06
majuk thiago: They pull and unpack it, then this should be the first patch applied. Looking at the source, all the line numbers line up... maybe I'll try applying that patch last. I'll see if I can move the ball. Thanks again.19:06
PHPanos left19:07
pandeiro joined19:12
Borg- https://tahoe-lafs.org/%7Ezooko/badmerge/simple.html19:13
interesting..19:13
its used in very old git.. does it still apply?19:14
nixjdm joined19:14
Lyberta left19:15
aard_ joined19:15
mygan joined19:16
Acerific joined19:18
Acerific left19:18
Acerific joined19:18
paul424 left19:18
Borg- anyway.. not trivial :)19:18
roelmonnens joined19:21
steeze joined19:22
roelmonnens left19:25
jeffreylevesque left19:26
yourdarling joined19:28
cagomez left19:29
ZyX-I joined19:29
noecc left19:29
cagomez joined19:29
majuk thiago: Thanks for your help, I cloned the source outside Yocto and generated the patch and it applied successfully. Appreciate it.19:30
Polylith left19:31
Polylith joined19:31
orbyt_ joined19:31
mike_oalian left19:31
paul424 joined19:32
Darkprof08-ru joined19:32
nydel07 left19:33
nydel09 left19:33
Darkprof08-ru left19:33
hvxgr_ left19:34
synthroid left19:34
bronson joined19:35
synthroid joined19:35
cagomez left19:37
TheVice joined19:38
yourdarling left19:38
synthroid left19:39
synthroi_ joined19:39
Es0teric left19:41
sarp joined19:42
lezer joined19:44
lezer left19:44
jstimm left19:45
chrfle left19:46
gugah left19:47
jost left19:47
snowkidind left19:47
ArcaTech joined19:48
Es0teric joined19:49
ArcaTech left19:50
ArcaTech joined19:52
jstein_ joined19:59
paul424 left19:59
jstein_jstein19:59
relipse in order to prevent merge conflicts should I do git checkout foo, git rebase master ?19:59
_ikke_ relipse: You prevent merge conflicts by communicating20:00
relipse as opposed to git checkout foo; git merge origin/master20:00
_ikke_ relipse: no git process can prevent merge conflicts20:00
No, you will still get merge conflicts, but you get smaller conflicts per commit, instead of one big merge conflict20:00
relipse if the merge conflicts get resolved early on then the person doing the release won't have to do it20:00
_ikke_ right20:01
That's something different20:01
Darcidride left20:01
relipse so they can do that by doing git merge origin/master or git rebase master right?20:01
_ikke_ You shift who has to do the conflict resolution20:01
nixjdm left20:01
_ikke_ relipse: If they can merge, it does not matter20:01
but if the merging is being done by someone else, rebasing is a good idea20:01
relipse so git rebase master right, not git rebase -i master?20:02
_ikke_ relipse: right, -i is mostly if you want to reorder, squash / reword / edit commits20:02
relipse and git rebase master will replay my branch on top of master right?20:03
cagomez joined20:05
spyroboy_ left20:05
Nizumzen left20:05
rokups left20:07
madewokherd joined20:07
cagomez left20:09
Rodya_ joined20:10
Argylelabcoat joined20:10
cdg joined20:11
bitmod joined20:11
jripke74 joined20:14
nixjdm joined20:14
jripke74 left20:15
cdg_ joined20:16
Rodya_ left20:16
roelmonnens joined20:16
jottr left20:17
cdg left20:19
akushner___ joined20:19
TXMillerTime joined20:20
Mattiaslndstrm left20:20
roelmonnens left20:20
Mattiaslndstrm joined20:20
raijin joined20:24
gonhidi left20:27
e^1 left20:28
exxi left20:28
durham_ joined20:29
akushner___ left20:31
jottr joined20:32
durham left20:32
ams__ left20:32
mattcen left20:32
phluks left20:33
durham_ left20:34
mattcen joined20:35
Solvaring joined20:36
tvw joined20:37
a3Dman left20:39
jceb left20:40
durham joined20:41
veremitz joined20:42
freimatz left20:42
cagedwisdom joined20:42
TXMillerTime left20:43
dave0x6d left20:43
jstein left20:45
cagomez joined20:45
gonhidi joined20:47
King_Hual joined20:47
King_Hual left20:47
King_Hual joined20:47
jungsubk left20:47
Es0teric left20:47
a3Dman joined20:48
jstimm joined20:49
jceb joined20:49
koell joined20:49
Es0teric joined20:52
aard_ left20:52
zulutango joined20:52
klasz joined20:53
abyx left20:53
gitinfo set mode: +v20:53
dsdeiz_ joined20:53
synthroi_ left20:55
Solvaring left20:55
czart left20:56
ntnn left20:56
Tylash joined20:57
czart joined20:57
zulutango left20:57
klasz hello, sry ive some stupid question. i ve clone u-boot with git clone https://github.com/altera-opensource/u-boot-socfpga.git after that i checkout the tag v2017.05-rc3 and change some files and add some more board specific files. after that the version 2017.05-rc3 is working. but now how can i update to the new tags (2017.09)without loosing my changes?20:57
jceb left20:57
_ikke_ klasz: create a branch, commit, then rebase / cherry-pick those commits20:58
dsdeiz_ left20:58
jnavila joined20:58
durham_ joined20:59
h12o left21:00
nydel07 joined21:00
klasz _ikke_: create new branch -> ok, commit -> ok21:00
southernirc left21:00
Rhonda left21:00
nixjdm left21:01
klasz _ikke_: but what about rebase and cherry pick? where can i found more information about that?21:01
jnewt left21:02
phinxy joined21:02
ntnn joined21:02
mikecmpbll joined21:02
durham left21:02
_ikke_ man git cherry-pick21:02
gitinfo the git-cherry-pick manpage is available at https://gitirc.eu/git-cherry-pick.html21:02
_ikke_ man git rebase21:02
gitinfo the git-rebase manpage is available at https://gitirc.eu/git-rebase.html21:02
mar77i joined21:03
_ikke_ https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Branching-Rebasing21:03
phinxy left21:03
durham_ left21:04
klasz k, never heard about cherry pick, i ll read some information21:04
Rodya_ joined21:04
mar77i_ left21:04
_ikke_ it's basically copying of commits21:06
LeBlaaanc joined21:09
jnavila left21:09
Tylash left21:10
Tylash joined21:11
sarp left21:11
edvb joined21:12
jnavila joined21:12
dave0x6d joined21:12
tmsmith joined21:12
rahtgaz joined21:12
jnavila left21:13
LeBlaaanc left21:13
nixjdm joined21:14
h12o joined21:14
montyboy left21:15
orbyt_ left21:15
sobersabre_ joined21:15
denimsoft joined21:15
akushner___ joined21:16
Achylles left21:16
Rhonda joined21:17
sobersabre left21:17
tmsmith left21:17
tmsmith joined21:17
sobersabre joined21:19
madewokherd left21:19
orbyt_ joined21:19
madewokherd joined21:20
koell left21:21
sobersabre_ left21:21
brent__ left21:22
Borg- left21:23
ivo_ left21:23
denimsoft left21:24
sarp joined21:25
rahtgaz left21:25
hahuang65 left21:25
denimsoft joined21:25
denimsoft left21:26
jottr left21:26
Guest3590 joined21:26
Murr left21:27
Murr joined21:27
wootehfoot left21:27
brent__ joined21:28
morgoth88 joined21:28
morgoth88 left21:28
mr_sm1th joined21:28
Guest3590 left21:31
raijin left21:32
Cabanossi left21:34
klasz left21:35
Cabanossi joined21:35
denimsoft joined21:37
sarp left21:37
olga left21:38
hugdru joined21:39
Es0teric left21:41
raijin joined21:42
agowa338 joined21:42
Eugene left21:43
relipse I'm trying to delete a remote branch but it says: error: unable to delete 'release/1.8.0': remote ref does not exist21:44
Why?21:45
Eugene joined21:45
FrostyBytes joined21:46
durham joined21:46
orbyt_ left21:46
FrostyBytes I have branch b froked from commit c. then I pull a lot more changes from upstream. now I make branch b' and I want to port up my changes visually to make sure each is still relevant. I want to use difftool with meld, but I want to see only stuff relevant to commits from c to the tip of b, not all the stuff that was added upstream. how do I do this?21:48
to be clear b' is branched on a more recent commit than c and I am now on the b' branch, trying to get my changes pulled up21:49
Dougie187 left21:50
agowa338 left21:51
dendazen joined21:52
thiago you should rebase instead of pull21:54
maryo_ left21:54
stutter left21:54
orbyt_ joined21:54
Milijus joined21:55
FrostyBytes ok, how do I rebase visually? like with meld?21:55
jeffreylevesque joined21:56
gonhidi left21:58
parsnip draw the commit graph?21:58
relipse left21:59
raijin left22:00
nixjdm left22:01
h12o left22:02
chrissha_ left22:02
cbonobo left22:02
Argylelabcoat left22:03
m0viefreak joined22:03
cbonobo joined22:03
Cabanossi left22:03
schleppel left22:04
cagomez left22:05
roelmonnens joined22:05
ZyX-I left22:05
Cabanossi joined22:05
namcapgunslinger22:06
orbyt_ left22:06
pandeiro left22:06
Anja joined22:07
DataComputist joined22:07
cbonobo left22:08
meadmoon joined22:08
jstimm left22:08
roelmonnens left22:09
meadmoon left22:09
durham left22:10
durham joined22:11
Acerific left22:11
jstimm joined22:11
cagomez joined22:12
cdown left22:12
FrostCandy left22:13
orbyt_ joined22:13
belmoussaoui left22:14
cagomez left22:16
xaa left22:17
sarp joined22:18
theoceaniscool left22:19
denimsoft left22:19
denimsoft joined22:20
denimsoft left22:20
xaa joined22:21
Phylock left22:21
denimsoft joined22:21
denimsoft left22:21
jost joined22:21
AaronMT left22:27
courrier________ left22:29
courrier________ joined22:29
bronson left22:29
ToBeCloud joined22:30
gitinfo set mode: +v22:30
King_Hual left22:30
mattcen left22:33
Phylock joined22:34
tvw left22:37
orbyt_ left22:37
mattcen joined22:37
orbyt_ joined22:38
sobersabre left22:40
madewokherd left22:41
sbeyer left22:42
madewokherd joined22:42
mescalinum left22:45
manuelschneid3r left22:48
venmx left22:49
venmx_ left22:50
theoceaniscool joined22:53
dsdeiz_ joined22:54
madewokherd` joined22:55
Anja left22:55
chrisshattuck joined22:55
madewokherd left22:56
halcyonn joined22:56
mikecmpbll left22:56
halcyonn left22:57
hugdru left22:57
halcyonn joined22:57
dsdeiz_ left22:59
JeffH_ joined22:59
akushne__ joined23:00
akushne__ left23:00
halcyonn left23:01
halcyonn joined23:01
fahadash left23:01
theoceaniscool left23:01
akushner___ left23:02
feodoran_ joined23:03
finalbeta left23:03
feodoranGuest8889223:04
feodoran_feodoran23:04
thiago left23:04
feodoran left23:05
dendazen left23:05
cagomez joined23:06
Guest88892 left23:06
JeffH_ left23:08
thiago joined23:08
sparr does init.templateDir have no default configuration value?23:08
snowkidind joined23:09
halcyonn left23:10
sarp left23:11
Phylock left23:12
DSLegends joined23:12
DSLegends anyone with gitlab-runner experience? I'm new to it, can't find answer on the interwebs, but installing to a mac. Following documentation steps, but when I type gitlab-runner register it fails with syntax error near unexpeceted token `newline`... even if I just run gitlab-runner same error...23:13
sparr DSLegends: never used it, but you probably have a config option that's empty or ends prematurely, or there's an unclosed () or {} somewhere in your config or data23:15
DSLegends thanks, All i've done thus far, is download, set permissions then run that command gitlab-runner register. Pretty sparse so far. I'll keep looking around, I agree likely an isolated issue between my chair and keyboard!23:18
chrisshattuck left23:19
salamanderrake left23:20
str_ left23:20
bruce_lee left23:21
mattcen left23:21
pandeiro joined23:21
salamanderrake joined23:22
mattcen joined23:24
sarp joined23:26
pandeiro left23:26
Murr left23:27
Murr joined23:27
grkblood13 joined23:27
grkblood13 i added a license to my project from the git site and then did a git fetch thinking it would pull it to my local repo but it didnt. is this normal?23:28
kadoban Yes, fetch doesn't change the files in your working directory23:29
overlord_tm left23:29
grkblood13 what command should i be using to get the license to my working directory then?23:31
TomyLobo left23:32
Tobbi left23:32
thiago git doesn't have a site you can edit23:32
did you mean github?23:32
Bobdude left23:33
grkblood13 yea23:33
i added directory in github23:33
directly*23:33
thiago ok, so assuming it committed23:34
have you pulled?23:34
grkblood13 yes, i tried a pull as well23:34
thiago did it finish with success?23:34
majuk left23:34
grkblood13 no tracking info with the current branch23:35
so i guess not23:35
thiago that's why then23:35
hfu joined23:35
thiago do you want to set up the tracking?23:36
grkblood13 git pull origin master did the trick23:36
thiago good23:36
make sure your licence doesn't say "Copyright (C) 2017 The XXxx Developers"23:37
replace it with your name or the legal entity owning the copyright23:37
grkblood13 XXxx developers sounds pretty good23:39
montyboy joined23:39
thiago but wrong23:39
use a person or company name23:39
mel00010 left23:40
webguynow left23:40
beerdrop left23:40
Noodlewitt joined23:40
xaa left23:41
renarc joined23:43
safe joined23:44
dsdeiz left23:45
dsdeiz joined23:45
str_ joined23:45
hfu left23:45
brent__ left23:46
xaa joined23:47
tang^ left23:48
cdg joined23:48
dege left23:49
durham_ joined23:49
bcat_ joined23:49
bcat_ left23:50
bcat_ joined23:50
cdg_ left23:52
durham left23:52
cdg left23:53
beerdrop joined23:53
steeze left23:53
roelmonnens joined23:53
durham_ left23:53
sarp left23:55
hfu joined23:56
roelmonnens left23:57
renarc left23:58
mel00010 joined23:58
DSLegends left23:59
raynold joined23:59

Logs Search ←Prev date Next date→ Channels Documentation