IRCloggy #git 2017-11-28

Logs Search ←Prev date Next date→ Channels Documentation

Provider of IRC logs since 2005.
WARNING: As Freenode became unjoinable and lost all warnings in topics, we cannot log channels on Freenode anymore.

2017-11-28

jrabe left00:00
ojacobson or git-shell but gitolite's a bit more capable if you have more than a single user+repo pair00:00
jstein left00:01
jrabe joined00:02
foo ojacobson: got it, appreciate it!00:02
akushner left00:02
tmsmith joined00:02
DaGoaty joined00:02
Jskal left00:03
ghost43 left00:03
Cabanossi left00:03
finalbeta left00:04
ghost43 joined00:04
Cabanossi joined00:06
anli joined00:06
upperdeck left00:07
DaGoaty left00:07
TomyLobo left00:08
DaGoaty joined00:08
upperdeck joined00:10
ghost43 left00:10
nowhere_man joined00:10
ghost43 joined00:10
hanna left00:12
rosa left00:12
DaGoaty left00:13
anli left00:13
rosa joined00:13
converge joined00:14
upperdeck left00:14
aielima left00:14
upperdeck joined00:16
simg01 left00:18
dsdeiz joined00:18
DaGoaty joined00:20
rosa left00:20
rosa joined00:20
upperdeck left00:20
rosa left00:21
rosa joined00:21
Slayer joined00:21
rosa left00:22
upperdeck joined00:22
rosa joined00:23
Gustavo6046 left00:24
rosa left00:24
rosa joined00:24
rosa left00:25
manuelschneid3r left00:25
ljc joined00:26
upperdeck left00:29
upperdeck joined00:30
jottr left00:31
akushner joined00:32
DaGoaty left00:33
orbyt_ left00:33
DaGoaty joined00:33
matsaman left00:33
jameser joined00:34
DaGoaty left00:38
upperdeck left00:38
upperdeck joined00:39
sosheskaz joined00:39
thiago left00:42
nowhereman_ joined00:43
hanna joined00:43
sosheskaz left00:44
tymczenko left00:46
nowhere_man left00:47
tmsmith left00:48
xaa left00:51
cdg joined00:51
Slayer left00:51
upperdeck left00:52
upperdeck joined00:53
sea-gull left00:54
cdg_ left00:55
beta169 joined00:55
cdg left00:56
tymczenko joined00:56
dviola joined00:56
because left00:57
Jskal joined00:57
ResidentBiscuit joined00:57
tymczenko left00:58
upperdeck left00:58
because joined00:58
upperdeck joined00:58
Murr left00:59
sim590 left00:59
Murr joined01:00
PaulCapestany left01:00
in1t3r left01:00
mar77i joined01:00
converge left01:01
akushner left01:01
lupine left01:01
converge joined01:01
in1t3r joined01:01
MaekSo left01:01
ResidentBiscuit left01:01
sim590 joined01:01
PaulCapestany joined01:01
lupine joined01:02
svm_invictvs left01:03
upperdeck left01:03
manuelschneid3r joined01:04
MaekSo joined01:04
svm_invictvs joined01:04
tymczenko_ joined01:05
rorro left01:05
upperdeck joined01:05
tymczenko_ left01:07
beta169 left01:09
jomo2205 joined01:10
manuelschneid3r left01:11
tymczenko_ joined01:12
tymczenko_ left01:12
tymczenko__ joined01:13
cqi joined01:13
mumux left01:13
upperdeck left01:14
fscala left01:14
durham_ joined01:14
str left01:15
upperdeck joined01:15
Trel left01:16
step joined01:17
durham left01:17
tymczenko__ left01:19
Feral_Cat joined01:19
durham_ left01:20
nd_ joined01:20
upperdeck left01:22
nd left01:23
upperdeck joined01:23
ljc left01:25
nd joined01:25
airdisa left01:26
tymczenko_ joined01:26
shinnya left01:26
raynold ahh it's a wonderful day01:27
nd_ left01:27
Arcaelyx_ joined01:27
ljc joined01:28
nd_ joined01:29
mooasaurus left01:30
paulg joined01:30
rofl_ joined01:30
nd left01:31
mooasaurus joined01:31
Arcaelyx left01:31
nd joined01:32
rofl_ left01:32
rofl_ joined01:32
jcarpenter2 left01:32
converge left01:32
Kiruwa joined01:34
nd_ left01:35
tymczenko joined01:36
rofl_jcarpenter201:36
gopar left01:37
gopar joined01:37
eijk left01:38
nd_ joined01:38
nd left01:39
thiago joined01:39
cagomez left01:40
paulg Found an interesting inconsistency. A sanity check I wrote compares a backported patch to the parent, looking at the @@ lines to ensure they both patch the same function...01:40
But if you use a bare repo, you get the most recent jump label in the @@ line and not the function name.01:41
https://pastebin.com/gQDCwfBA01:41
Bercik left01:42
nd joined01:43
nd_ left01:43
Bercik joined01:44
madewokherd joined01:47
tymczenko_ left01:47
qpdb left01:51
qpdb joined01:51
upperdeck left01:54
byte512 joined01:55
upperdeck joined01:55
tmsmith joined01:58
converge joined01:59
Trel joined02:01
gopar left02:02
finalbeta joined02:02
in1t3r_ joined02:03
gopar joined02:03
leeN left02:03
ljc left02:03
Lyqyd joined02:04
gopar left02:04
tunekey left02:04
texinwien_ joined02:04
gopar joined02:05
in1t3r left02:05
converge left02:08
Feral_Cat left02:09
tvw left02:10
perrier-jouet left02:10
ResidentBiscuit joined02:14
tmsmith left02:14
gopar left02:17
gopar joined02:18
Zamerick left02:18
Elon_Satoshi joined02:18
ResidentBiscuit left02:19
Cabanossi left02:19
dsdeiz left02:20
dsdeiz joined02:21
dsdeiz left02:21
dsdeiz joined02:21
Cabanossi joined02:21
step left02:21
markmarkmark left02:23
brent__ left02:23
justanotheruser left02:24
ResidentBiscuit joined02:26
justanotheruser joined02:26
justanotheruser left02:27
ResidentBiscuit left02:27
justanotheruser joined02:27
durham joined02:27
orbyt_ joined02:29
bambams joined02:32
bambams left02:32
bambams joined02:32
dreiss joined02:32
fscala joined02:32
Nizumzen joined02:35
nevodka left02:37
markmarkmark joined02:39
ilbot3 left02:46
dave0x6d left02:46
Jskal left02:47
ResidentBiscuit joined02:47
dreiss left02:48
gopar left02:49
nevodka joined02:50
Jskal joined02:52
Tobbi left02:52
pks left02:57
ilbot3 joined02:58
pks joined02:59
Murr left02:59
Murr joined03:00
d^sh left03:00
d^sh joined03:01
snowkidind joined03:02
Cabanossi left03:03
Cabanossi joined03:06
codyw joined03:08
Rothschild_666 joined03:11
lagothri1 joined03:11
Rothschild_666 sup my git dawgs!03:11
how come when i run git remote fetch after git remote add origin path_to_project03:13
lagothrix left03:13
Rothschild_666 all of the files from the remot repo are marked as deleted?03:14
but not staged for delete?03:14
mmattice remote fetch doesn't do anything with the working copy, just pulls down commits03:14
igemnace joined03:15
Rothschild_666 so i need to merge them into the working copy?03:16
svm_invictvs left03:17
ResidentBiscuit left03:22
jnewt left03:26
Elon_Satoshi left03:27
sunri5e left03:29
sunri5e joined03:29
neel joined03:30
Rothschild_666 left03:30
neelGuest2726103:30
Elon_Satoshi joined03:30
pks left03:31
sarp joined03:35
pks joined03:35
dviola left03:35
[Brain] left03:37
durham left03:38
durham joined03:39
scientes joined03:41
scientes left03:41
scientes joined03:41
xaxxon joined03:42
jomo2205 left03:43
ResidentBiscuit joined03:44
cqi_ joined03:46
cqi left03:47
rjsalts joined03:47
bruz_ joined03:48
chachasmooth_ joined03:49
chachasmooth left03:49
JackFruh left03:50
xaxxon left03:52
rjsalts I have a project that's been going since 1989 or thereabouts. There is a home grown version control system that makes RCS look highly advanced. I'm wanting to import the history into git.03:53
ResidentBiscuit left03:54
rjsalts The way it works is that it has a directory which has entire copies of the old versions of a file. e.g. if it was foo.c there is an FCS/.foo.c.1.000 and a FCS/.foo.c.log with commit messages03:55
Are there any tools that could help import such a history?03:57
bruz_ left04:01
Munt left04:01
pks left04:03
pks joined04:05
mmattice I wrote a script to import a visual source safe repo into subversion years ago. It essentially checked out every revision, copied that over the working copy, and checked it in. It was ugly, but it worked.04:05
cdg joined04:06
mulvane left04:07
rjsalts does vss track commits per file, or have multiple files in a commit?04:08
_Vi left04:08
_Vi joined04:09
rewt if you're doing checkout from one vcs and commit to another, that shouldn't really matter04:09
rjsalts It's not a VCS perse, it's backups of files with a file that contains descriptions of changes04:10
per se even04:11
Enphuego left04:11
rjsalts there are also a large number of files which are "version controlled"04:11
although I don't think that's a big deal04:12
mulvane joined04:12
mulvane left04:12
mulvane joined04:12
rafasc left04:15
Bobguy joined04:18
Cabanossi left04:18
svm_invictvs joined04:19
Cabanossi joined04:20
Bobdude left04:22
dreiss joined04:30
durham left04:32
overlord_tm left04:35
Puffball left04:37
snowkidind left04:38
Puffball joined04:40
noobineer joined04:41
noobineer left04:41
Rr4sT joined04:44
mizu_no_oto joined04:45
upperdeck left04:47
xaxxon joined04:47
cdg left04:48
cdg joined04:48
upperdeck joined04:49
cdg left04:53
Bajax left04:56
orbyt_ left04:56
imack joined04:58
Murr left04:59
Murr joined05:00
Bajax joined05:03
qqx left05:04
dirtyroshi__ joined05:04
swift1 left05:04
niax joined05:04
dirtyroshi__ left05:05
qqx joined05:05
CustosLimen joined05:05
anh joined05:05
Guest27261 left05:05
swift1 joined05:05
anh left05:06
dreiss left05:06
nephyrin left05:09
govg joined05:11
nephyrin joined05:12
sarp left05:13
Bajax left05:15
dre_ left05:19
MACscr joined05:19
Bajax joined05:24
reallycooldude left05:30
day__ joined05:31
reallycooldude joined05:32
daey left05:34
day__daey05:35
xlegoman left05:35
cqi_ left05:36
sarp joined05:36
freimatz joined05:36
ZexaronS left05:38
xaxxon_ joined05:40
xaxxon left05:40
xaxxon_xaxxon05:40
reallycooldude left05:43
philosaur joined05:44
luckman212 left05:49
ghost43 left05:50
ghost43 joined05:50
darktemprary joined05:52
jj995 joined05:52
re1 joined05:52
jj995 I'm trying to change a git-crypt key, and all attempts to do so seem to lead to fatal git diff errors. Is there an alternative to git-crypt? How can anyone responsibly use git-crypt without the ability to rotate keys?05:53
netj left05:53
netj joined05:53
xaxxon left05:54
luckman212 joined05:55
xaxxon joined05:56
mizu_no_oto left05:57
xaxxon left05:57
yohnnyjoe left05:58
xaxxon joined05:58
cqi joined05:58
binary106 hi my git branch -vv says a non-checked out branch is "behind 1004".. how do i pull this so it's up to date?06:01
xaxxon left06:02
reallycooldude joined06:02
xaxxon joined06:03
Jskal left06:04
boombatower left06:07
re1_ joined06:10
darktemprary left06:11
_ikke_ binary106: check out that branch and then either git merge or git rebase06:12
binary106 that's suprising that i can't do --all06:13
darktemprary joined06:13
binary106 so if i'm working on a feature branch, and i want to pull latest changes from master.. do i have to checkout master && pull first06:14
thiago binary106: --all what06:15
?06:15
re1 left06:15
neil_cn joined06:15
thiago you used "master" in that sentence twice but I think you meant two different branches called master06:15
binary106 git fetch --all06:15
thiago the first "master" you probably meant "origin/master"06:16
binary106 well i did git checkout master && git checkout -b my-branch06:16
but i forgot to pull latest from master06:16
thiago the first command was useless06:16
binary106 ah06:16
thiago oh, it set up the tracking06:16
felixsanz left06:16
thiago you could have done: git checkout -b my-branch master06:16
you don't need to update the local master. You can simply merge/rebase on top of origin/master06:17
as for git fetch, you can do git fetch --all06:17
re1 joined06:17
thiago but git fetch never updates local branches06:17
BULUT35 joined06:17
binary106 but git fetch -all didn't do anything when i was on my-branch06:17
--all06:17
thiago that's because git fetch doesn't do anything to any branch06:17
BULUT35 left06:18
binary106 well i also tried git pull --all06:18
codyw left06:18
codyw joined06:18
thiago that's a misleading option06:18
don't use it06:18
binary106 well it's what i want06:18
thiago no, it's not06:18
binary106 git pull *06:18
it is :D06:18
thiago git pull --all == git fetch --all && git merge @{u}06:18
cur8or left06:18
binary106 i was on my-branch, and git branch -vv shows master is behind..06:19
thiago it does not do what you want06:19
felixsanz joined06:19
binary106 sure but the language "all" is what i want06:19
thiago I understand what you want06:19
that's not git pull --all06:19
binary106 so do i have to go back to master, pull that, then checkout my-branch again06:20
thx for this help btw, i'm so dumb06:20
thiago no, you don't06:20
you don't need to update the local master06:20
nydel07 left06:20
binary106 but i just branched from an old master06:20
by mistake06:20
thiago yeah, so?06:21
sosheskaz joined06:21
binary106 how do i bring my-branch up to date with master06:21
thiago you can update the branch after you've created to the latest upstream06:21
again using "master" to mean two things06:21
it *is* up to date with master (the local branch)06:21
binary106 oh06:21
jceb joined06:21
re1_ left06:21
thiago it's not up to date with remote master06:21
binary106 so if i had done checkout -b my-feature origin/master, it'd have worked?06:21
thiago yes06:22
and it would have set up the tracking branch too06:22
binary106 and fetch updates the origin/ bit?06:22
thiago yes06:22
LocaMocha joined06:23
binary106 so i do git checkout master && git fetch --all && git pull && git branch -d my-feature && git checkout my-feature origin/master06:24
Guest27261 joined06:24
SuperHacker joined06:24
thiago no06:24
aoscott joined06:24
thiago first of all, you don't need git fetch before git pull. Pull will fetch.06:25
second, if you don't specify -b when calling checkout, you can't pass the branch to start from06:25
sosheskaz left06:25
binary106 oops, thx, i added the -b06:25
happymeal joined06:25
thiago so more simply: git checkout master && git pull && git checkout -b my-feature origin/master06:25
binary106 it worked! thank you06:26
thiago finally, note that the branch creation does not depend on the local master06:26
anli joined06:26
thiago so the first checkout isn't necessary. You can just do: git fetch && git checkout -b my-feature origin/master06:26
binary106 even if i didnt have master locally, that's cool06:26
thiago or: git checkout -b my-feature origin/master && git pull06:26
binary106 now, this branch wont touch anything that gets edited on master, so when master updates next, what command do i type06:26
jameser left06:27
binary106 something like git pull --rebase --ff-only ?06:27
thiago command to do what?06:27
binary106 rebase updates to master onto my-feature06:27
thiago git pull --rebase06:27
binary106 (atm i'm paranoid i'm going to get master/my-branch the wrong way around haha)06:27
VolcanoMan joined06:27
binary106 but not from my-feature, but from master06:28
jameser joined06:28
SuperHacker left06:28
thiago git checkout my-feature && git pull --rebase06:28
the local master branch is irrelevant06:28
SuperHacker joined06:29
SuperHacker left06:29
binary106 okay so i'm on my-feature branch06:29
and origin/master has updated06:29
Puffball left06:29
thiago ok06:29
Jskal joined06:31
pgupta joined06:31
darktemprary left06:31
Puffball joined06:32
darktemprary joined06:32
pgupta left06:32
Lyqyd left06:33
binary106 will git pull --rebase only take from origin/my-branch. To pull changes from origin/master, do i execute "git rebase origin/master" ?06:33
mooasaurus left06:35
ghost43 left06:36
binary106 ooh06:36
ghost43 joined06:37
binary106 so this tracking thing has linked my-branch to origin/master, i see, so when i git pull it comes from master instead of my-branch?06:37
origin/master*06:37
thiago git pull --rebase == git fetch && git rebase @{u}06:37
mentalita left06:37
binary106 what is @{u}06:38
have i created a local branch only? i wanted it to appear in bitbucket, too06:39
Puffball left06:40
binary106 in phpstorm, next to my-branch it says origin/master, but a previous branch i created a while ago says "origin/my-other-branch"06:40
Puffball joined06:40
thiago @{u} is your upstream branch06:40
it's a literal thing. Git replaces it with the upstream branch06:40
yes, you have only created a local branch06:41
if you want it to appear ina remote, push it06:41
binary106 but i'm worried it's going to push to origin/master06:42
thiago git push origin my-feature:my-feature06:42
the first time you push, you may need to write refs/heads/my-feature for the second part06:43
happymeal left06:43
ZyX-I joined06:43
hellux joined06:44
zefferno joined06:46
shripadr joined06:46
muelleme joined06:47
mooasaurus joined06:47
jceb left06:51
dreiss joined06:52
mooasaur1s joined06:53
Rr4sT left06:54
mooasaurus left06:54
jost joined06:56
mentalita joined06:56
binary106 thanks, it worked =]06:58
Murr left06:59
Murr joined07:00
dsdeiz left07:00
Raging_Hog joined07:00
nydel07 joined07:00
dsdeiz joined07:01
dsdeiz left07:01
dsdeiz joined07:01
VolcanoMan left07:01
VolcanoMan joined07:02
freimatz left07:02
freimatz joined07:02
rscata joined07:04
dec0n joined07:04
MrMojit0 joined07:06
darktemprary left07:08
VolcanoMan left07:08
cur8or joined07:09
Repox joined07:18
chachasmooth_ left07:19
chachasmooth joined07:19
jameser_ joined07:20
paulg left07:20
happymeal joined07:20
lupine left07:20
SuperHacker joined07:20
dave0x6d joined07:20
darktemprary joined07:21
lupine joined07:22
SuperHacker left07:22
Garen left07:22
jameser left07:23
VolcanoMan joined07:24
SuperHacker joined07:24
SuperHacker left07:24
muelleme left07:24
ocds joined07:25
devbaka joined07:25
Garen joined07:25
happymeal left07:25
happymeal joined07:26
schleppel joined07:26
abba joined07:27
VolcanoMan left07:27
VolcanoMan joined07:28
anli left07:31
Dreadnaught joined07:31
Dreadnaught left07:31
Dreadnaught joined07:31
jameser_ left07:32
Cabanossi left07:33
darktemprary left07:33
jameser joined07:34
Kulrak left07:34
VanlindtMarc1979 joined07:34
Cabanossi joined07:35
tkore\work joined07:35
darktemprary joined07:37
in1t3r joined07:38
JeroenT joined07:39
JeroenT left07:39
yohnnyjoe joined07:39
JeroenT joined07:39
in1t3r_ left07:41
ocds left07:43
xaxxon_ joined07:43
bruce_lee joined07:43
xaxxon left07:44
yohnnyjoe left07:44
oojacoboo joined07:46
dreiss left07:48
BR5C003Y_D00 joined07:48
cdg joined07:49
wandering_vagran joined07:51
BR5C003Y_D00 left07:51
MaekSo left07:52
MaekSo joined07:52
guideline left07:53
cdg left07:53
Silmarilion joined07:54
jameser left07:55
jameser joined07:55
eshlox joined07:56
jrabe left08:00
chele joined08:01
jrabe joined08:02
dre_ joined08:03
seschwar joined08:04
hs366 joined08:05
VolcanoMan left08:05
happymeal left08:05
happymeal joined08:05
VolcanoMan joined08:05
theoceaniscool joined08:05
senaps joined08:06
guideline joined08:06
guideline left08:07
sclarkso left08:07
happymeal left08:08
happymeal joined08:08
sclarkso joined08:08
bauruine joined08:09
texinwien_ left08:10
yohnnyjoe joined08:11
texinwien_ joined08:12
cdown joined08:13
thiago left08:14
dlf42 joined08:14
yohnnyjoe left08:15
scientes left08:16
murii_ joined08:17
jost left08:18
sea-gull joined08:18
ZyX-I left08:18
kculpis left08:21
thierryp joined08:22
TomyWork joined08:22
flaviodesousa joined08:23
thierryp left08:24
ResidentBiscuit joined08:25
ketasketas--08:25
texinwien_ left08:27
texinwien_ joined08:28
VolcanoMan left08:29
dege joined08:30
ResidentBiscuit left08:30
ketas-ketas08:30
dsdeiz left08:30
devbaka left08:30
dsdeiz joined08:31
dsdeiz left08:31
dsdeiz joined08:31
thierryp joined08:31
Jskal left08:31
Cabanossi left08:32
VolcanoMan joined08:33
basteh joined08:33
madewokherd left08:34
Cabanossi joined08:35
guideline joined08:36
kurkale6ka joined08:37
mikedd joined08:37
diqidoq joined08:41
kurkale6ka left08:42
xaa joined08:43
howdoi joined08:45
VolcanoMan left08:46
VolcanoMan joined08:47
dsop left08:47
darktemprary left08:49
madknight joined08:49
matthiaskrgr joined08:49
matthiaskrgrGuest6340608:49
Darcidride joined08:50
cdown left08:50
darktemprary joined08:50
hio joined08:51
Munt joined08:51
hio hi, I just did git pull. Can I revert that somehow?08:51
eijk joined08:51
grawity git reset [probably with --hard] @{1}08:51
if the merge was successful08:51
if it *wasn't* successful, just do `git merge --abort` instead08:51
hio i think it was08:52
kurkale6ka joined08:52
dsop joined08:54
Raed left08:55
hio grawity, it removed my local changes but it didnt go back to where it was before08:56
ketas-- left08:56
Raed joined08:57
floppydh joined08:57
Anja_ left08:57
f2k joined08:59
Murr left08:59
Murr joined09:00
jstein_ joined09:01
jstein_jstein09:01
oxymoron93 joined09:01
Cabanossi left09:02
whitby left09:04
Barrt left09:04
Barrt joined09:05
whitby joined09:05
Cabanossi joined09:05
permalac left09:06
overlord_tm joined09:07
kurkale6ka left09:08
freimatz left09:10
kurkale6ka joined09:10
cousteau joined09:11
tobiasvl hio: where did it go then?09:12
cousteau Hi. I have a repo with a "master" branch, a "style" branch a few commits ahead of "master", and a "style2" branch in the same commit as "style". I want to remove "style2" without removing "style".09:13
however when I do `git branch -d style2` I get a warning about it not being merged... is it ok to remove it?09:14
oxymoron93 git checkout master && git branch -D style209:14
cousteau or should I checkout to "style" just in case?09:14
osse cousteau: yes09:14
cousteau ...ok but I'm gonna checkout style first just in case09:14
osse cousteau: Checking out style will silence the warning09:14
jast 'git branch -d' compares to the currenty checked out branch, so once you're on 'style' it'll find that everything is "merged" :)09:15
cousteau yep, it did :) I therefore assume it was safe09:15
dsop left09:15
diqidoq left09:15
oxymoron93 it is always safe, it is just a name09:15
anli joined09:15
oxymoron93 imo09:15
cousteau I always prefer not having warnings to ignoring warnings09:15
oxymoron93, yeah but I'm kinda new to git and I really didn't want to lose that whole commit string09:16
dsop joined09:16
cousteau ...btw, off-topic: how often do you think of time-traveling movies while learning / using / developing with git?09:16
jast seems like you have yet to meet the reflog, git's mighty guardian against losing commits09:16
cousteau because I'm thinking of "parallel dimensions" and "alternate realities" all the time :|09:17
jast never. sorry to disappoint. :)09:17
cousteau ouch09:17
VolcanoMan left09:17
cousteau ...so when you switch to another branch you just think "I'm going to switch to another branch", not "I'm going to travel to an alternate reality where X never happened"?09:18
tobiasvl haha09:18
VolcanoMan joined09:18
codyw left09:18
jast that's right09:18
cousteau there really should be a git-based sci-fi movie about time travel09:18
tobiasvl the time travelling paradigm09:18
jast I'm still looking for that alternate reality in which the last five years of web development don't exist09:19
make it ten just to be safe09:19
cousteau but social networks!09:19
jast does IRC count? :)09:20
cousteau and 3 others have liked jast's idea09:20
navidr joined09:20
jast utter fabrication, nobody ever likes my ideas09:20
cousteau I'll be honest, all this social network stuff is annoying09:20
anli left09:21
cousteau also, traveling 10 years back in time might mean convincing Nokia to keep on with their GNU/Linux-based phone idea09:21
osse Hmm, I've seen messages like "not merged to master, but is merged in origin/whatever" but maybe it just compares the branch to its own upstream09:22
Guest27261 left09:22
jnavila joined09:22
diqidoq joined09:23
upperdeck left09:24
Jskal joined09:26
Munt left09:26
Floflobel joined09:26
_ADN_ joined09:26
upperdeck joined09:26
osse cousteau: there's the emoji movie, so why not the repo movie09:27
cousteau no! NO! I was talking about a serious movie09:27
cteqpan[work] joined09:27
cousteau like, about time traveling itself, no mention of git, but lots of git-related terminology09:27
"I'm gonna checkout an alternate reality!"09:28
"the universes have merged!"09:28
dave0x6d left09:30
cousteau "I'm sorry Mr. Dwight, but you're the only conflict across these realities, you must be terminated"09:31
welp, gotta go... thanks for the help!09:31
Barrt left09:31
cousteau left09:31
energizer left09:34
Cabanossi left09:34
clmsy joined09:34
Cabanossi joined09:35
senaps left09:35
VolcanoMan left09:35
VolcanoMan joined09:37
TheVice joined09:38
Xrayez joined09:40
theoceaniscool left09:41
floppydh left09:42
andrbmgi joined09:43
floppydh joined09:43
xaxxon joined09:43
Nizumzen left09:44
TheVice left09:44
JeroenT left09:45
Barrt joined09:46
JeroenT joined09:46
sarp left09:46
xaxxon_ left09:47
dsdeiz left09:48
dsdeiz joined09:48
dsdeiz left09:48
dsdeiz joined09:48
gitinfo set mode: +v09:48
andrbmgi Hi, I cannot rebase my branch anymore, no error message, it just says it starts applying patches then falls back to console. No changes to branch whatsoever. I also cannot replay my changes onto another branch, same behaviour. I made a new branch from master and copied in my changes basically sqashing everything into one commit throwing away all the history but the new branch has the same problem. Any ideas?09:48
darktemprary left09:49
moritz andrbmgi: it sounds to me like your rebase target is already in your branch09:50
jast it wouldn't start applying patches in that case, would it?09:50
JeroenT left09:50
darktemprary joined09:50
andrbmgi It worked for quite a while, I don't see that anything major changed09:51
moritz why not? I think it would apply the patches 1:109:51
jast but then the branch *would* be changed09:51
xaxxon left09:51
jast due to the commit IDs changing09:51
andrbmgi can you detail what is meant by "target is already in the branch"?09:51
moritz andrbmgi: that HEAD is a descendent of the commit you pass to 'git rebase'09:52
xaxxon joined09:52
jast basically if you're rebasing against something that is already fully contained in your checked out branch09:53
andrbmgi definitely not the case, the whole reason I am trying to do the rebase is to get the changes on master in09:54
theoceaniscool joined09:54
happymeal left09:54
happymeal joined09:54
fmgt joined09:54
Plorntus joined09:54
moritz andrbmgi: just for checking, can you merge that branch in?09:54
jast can you share a copy of your repo, or is it too secret? :)09:54
fmgt left09:54
andrbmgi hmm its a company repo, nothing too secret about it but I am not sure if I can share it09:55
Plorntus Is it possible to have 2 people working on the same merge conflicts (on the same branch) at the same time?09:55
jast right, so probably not09:55
moritz Plorntus: if they share a screen and a keyboard, why not?09:55
Plorntus Haha on 2 different computers09:55
jast Plorntus: well, there's no special tool to synchronize their efforts09:56
andrbmgi no we are doing a developer academy thing, basically the master branch contains exercise files and everyone is solving them on their own branch09:56
jast they could do it manually09:56
oxymoron93 well why not, if they have same history and are doing same thing09:56
Plorntus Have a guy here adamant its possible and committing one file at a time. Obviously this does not work for me and therefore trying to figure out if this is actually a thing09:56
jast well, you can't commit if there are unmerged entries in the index09:56
Plorntus No idea what I am doing wrong if it is possible09:56
Thats the thing, some how they're able to commit09:56
jast so, the only way to actually do it would be *terrible*09:57
sarp joined09:57
jast i.e. by marking the files as resolved even though they still have conflict markers all over them09:57
andrbmgi moritz yes merging works without problems09:57
moritz there are other ways, though they require some managment overhead09:57
ivan left09:57
jast the result is terrible unhelpful diffs and a pile of junk commits09:58
Plorntus They've not committed the unmerged versions of the files, they literally stage the one file and then commit09:58
jast that doesn't actually work09:58
Plorntus Exactly what I was thinking09:58
moritz for example if your goal it merge foo into master, you can merge master into foo instead, resolve some of the conflicts and stash the result away somehow, abort the merge, and then re-created the resolved versions of the files in branch foo09:58
Plorntus but some how it does for them.09:58
Thats why I am so confused09:58
moritz and different people can do the same thing for different files09:58
and when you've done that for all conflicting files, you can do a git checkout master; git merge -X theirs foo09:59
leeN joined09:59
mud left10:00
jast you could, in theory, work your way around unmerged entries, and perhaps some third-party git client/GUI does that10:00
but the official 'git' won't let you commit if there are any unmerged entries left10:00
VolcanoMan left10:01
jast and working around it isn't too easy, you have to construct a temporary index file and all10:01
Plorntus Ahhh, maybe that is it. They use Sourcetree (or something like that)10:01
cstratak joined10:01
Plorntus I use git from the command line10:01
jast if any GUI does this, it's bad and deserves to be cleansed by fire :}10:01
andrbmgi brb I have to reboot10:01
andrbmgi left10:02
ShalokShalom left10:02
Plorntus Yeah... It wouldnt suprise me. Atlassian has some really backwards ideology about everything10:03
VolcanoMan joined10:03
jast there isn't really any way to implement this that makes sense10:03
andrbmgi joined10:04
moritz .oO( Dropbox for git-rerere )10:04
gitinfo set mode: +v10:04
jast moritz: thank you for volunteering for our "cleansing in fire" programme10:04
dimi1947 joined10:04
jnavila left10:05
jnavila joined10:05
LichtMacher left10:05
JeroenT joined10:07
happymeal left10:07
devbaka joined10:07
tunekey joined10:08
dre_ left10:08
achadwick joined10:10
darktemprary left10:12
yohnnyjoe joined10:12
kurkale6ka left10:13
darktemprary joined10:13
kurkale6ka joined10:13
perrier-jouet joined10:15
nanga left10:16
sclarkso left10:16
yohnnyjoe left10:16
nanga joined10:17
nanga left10:17
nanga joined10:17
Darcidride left10:17
Darcidride joined10:18
vish93 joined10:20
sarp left10:20
cdown joined10:20
sosheskaz joined10:21
upperdeck left10:22
jnavila left10:23
andrbmgi Oh great, I tried de-installing and reinstalling Git and now it just hangs and after quite a while (minutes!) gives that: "/bin/sh: warning: shell level (1000) too high, resetting to 110:23
"10:23
BTW I am using git bash on Win7 Pro10:24
VolcanoMan left10:24
jast sounds like endless recursion10:24
andrbmgi Google says that means its opening subshells10:24
yeah but why?10:24
jast you probably found some kind of bug :)10:24
andrbmgi oh noes10:24
upperdeck joined10:25
jast reproducing it will probably need a copy of the repo, though10:25
kurkale61 joined10:25
sosheskaz left10:25
cqi left10:26
cqi joined10:27
kurkale6ka left10:27
VolcanoMan joined10:27
jottr joined10:28
jameser left10:28
darktemprary left10:28
darktemprary joined10:31
andrbmgi Is there a way to make git spit out debug output of some sort?10:31
jast for some of it10:32
as a starting point, GIT_TRACE=1 git rebase [...]10:32
cur8or_ joined10:32
andrbmgi ty trying10:33
cur8or left10:33
andrbmgi 11:33:13.317063 git.c:576 trace: exec: 'git-rebase' 'master'10:34
11:33:13.321064 run-command.c:626 trace: run_command: 'git-rebase' 'master'10:34
11:33:13.928098 git.c:344 trace: built-in: git 'rev-parse' '--git-dir'10:34
11:33:13.978101 git.c:344 trace: built-in: git 'rev-parse' '--git-path' 'objects'10:34
11:33:14.007103 git.c:344 trace: built-in: git 'rev-parse' '--is-bare-repository'10:34
11:33:14.035104 git.c:344 trace: built-in: git 'rev-parse' '--show-toplevel'10:34
11:33:14.075107 git.c:344 trace: built-in: git 'config' '--bool' 'rebase.stat'10:34
11:33:14.114109 git.c:344 trace: built-in: git 'config' '--bool' 'rebase.autostash'10:34
11:33:14.152111 git.c:344 trace: built-in: git 'config' '--bool' 'rebase.autosquash'10:34
11:33:14.191113 git.c:344 trace: built-in: git 'config' '--bool' 'commit.gpgsign'10:34
then that over and over again, sry for flooding10:34
oxymoron93 andrbgmi you could use some paste tool for that10:34
PHPanos joined10:34
jast !paste10:35
gitinfo Please use a pastebin for snippets longer than one line. https://gist.github.com and https://upaste.de/ both work well.10:35
andrbmgi will do10:35
VolcanoMan left10:36
andrbmgi it loops at rev-parse --git-dir10:36
cymen Hm...somebody did a force push on a repo that I use (maybe that's the reason) and now I get fatal: refusing to merge unrelated histories when trying to pull10:37
jast the 'git-rebase' isn't part of the loop?10:37
andrbmgi nope10:37
cymen I don't even have any changes. How do I get back to the server version of things?10:37
jast that's curious10:37
VolcanoMan joined10:37
jast cymen: git fetch; git reset --hard @{upstream}10:38
andrbmgi how so?10:38
cdg joined10:38
Cavallari joined10:38
jnavila joined10:38
cdg_ joined10:39
cymen jast: what is @{upstream}? it doesn't seem to be in my config...10:42
jast just those characters, in that order :)10:42
cdg left10:42
tvw joined10:42
jast or @{u} as shorthand10:43
Cavallari left10:43
jast *usually* that works, otherwise git reset --hard <name of remote>/<name of branch>10:43
in both cases, all uncommitted changes will be destroyed10:43
cdg_ left10:43
igemnace cymen: check out git help revisions to see different ways to specify revisions, including @{upstream}10:44
tcorneli joined10:47
VolcanoMan left10:48
Spydar007 left10:48
jcarpenter2 left10:49
Nizumzen joined10:49
Nizumzen left10:49
VolcanoMan joined10:49
in1t3r left10:51
in1t3r joined10:52
manuelschneid3r joined10:52
darktemprary left10:52
andrbmgi I think the problem may be on my machine. I cloned the repo in a different directory and checked out another branch and have the same problem, even with an empty branch (no commits) I created earlier. I know that the other can to rebases on their branches but when I try on their branch it fails.10:53
sarp joined10:53
andrbmgi others*10:53
darktemprary joined10:55
jstein left10:59
VolcanoMan left10:59
Murr left10:59
Murr joined10:59
cdg joined11:00
jnavila left11:01
MarioBranco joined11:01
VolcanoMan joined11:02
Cabanossi left11:03
JeroenT left11:03
upperdeck left11:04
cdg left11:04
Cabanossi joined11:05
upperdeck joined11:05
a3Dman left11:10
VolcanoMan left11:13
VolcanoMan joined11:15
Nizumzen joined11:16
LichtMacher joined11:17
nowhereman_ left11:17
nowhereman_ joined11:18
darktemprary left11:18
kurkale6ka joined11:18
kurkale61 left11:19
Cavallari joined11:21
tcorneli left11:21
Anja_ joined11:22
cur8or_ left11:24
kurkale6ka left11:24
mentalita left11:25
aacn500 joined11:25
kurkale6ka joined11:28
hcolor joined11:29
davimore_ left11:29
raynold left11:29
PHPanos left11:30
davimore_ joined11:30
hcolor left11:30
shripadr left11:30
Elon_Satoshi left11:30
aacn500 left11:31
VolcanoMan left11:32
cur8or joined11:33
tobiasvl left11:33
Cavallari left11:33
Cavallari joined11:34
kurkale6ka left11:34
nast joined11:34
VolcanoMan joined11:35
Elon_Satoshi joined11:36
kurkale6ka joined11:37
converge joined11:38
mentalita joined11:39
Bennux_dev joined11:40
nowhereman_ left11:41
nowhereman_ joined11:41
jottr left11:43
kurkale6ka left11:43
JeroenT joined11:43
xaxxon_ joined11:47
kurkale6ka joined11:47
xaxxon left11:47
JeroenT_ joined11:48
Ellusionist joined11:48
neil_cn left11:49
treefrob joined11:50
salamanderrake left11:51
JeroenT left11:51
Masber_080 joined11:52
masuberu left11:53
jottr joined11:53
Celelibi left11:54
tarkus joined11:56
kurkale61 joined11:56
kurkale6ka left11:57
hio left11:58
dimi1947 left11:59
nast left11:59
nast joined12:00
cteqpan joined12:01
darktemprary joined12:01
cteqpan[work] left12:02
sarri left12:02
Cabanossi left12:03
devbaka left12:04
Cabanossi joined12:05
sarp left12:05
cousteau joined12:05
cousteau if I don't like the last commit I made, `git reset --hard HEAD~` will "rewind" the current branch to the previous one, right?12:06
VolcanoMan left12:06
osse yes12:06
cousteau I've created another branch pointing here just in case I decide the change wasn't a bad idea after all somewhere in the future12:06
_ikke_ correct, make sure you don't have any uncomitted changes though12:06
cousteau ok12:06
_ikke_ cousteau: there is always the reflog to keep track of 'lost' commits12:07
cousteau perfect!12:07
_ikke_, the reflog is the one who would have complained if I hadn't made another branch, right?12:07
_ikke_ no, the reflog is just passively saving you from yourself :-)12:09
phinxy left12:10
cqi left12:11
phinxy joined12:12
yohnnyjoe joined12:13
Plorntus left12:14
PHPanos joined12:15
kurkale61 left12:16
davimore_ left12:16
kurkale61 joined12:16
davimore_ joined12:17
yohnnyjoe left12:17
nast left12:18
nast joined12:19
jnavila joined12:19
Ellusionist left12:20
floppydh left12:20
floppydh joined12:20
upperdeck left12:22
Ellusionist joined12:22
tvl joined12:22
tvltobiasvl12:22
kurkale6ka joined12:23
cdown left12:23
upperdeck joined12:23
kurkale61 left12:24
Ellusionist left12:24
d1b left12:26
Ellusionist joined12:26
jottr left12:26
darktemprary left12:27
freimatz joined12:27
darktemprary joined12:28
kurkale6ka left12:30
ertes-w left12:30
sarp joined12:31
Zamerick joined12:31
d1b joined12:31
mikedd left12:32
ghost43 left12:34
sarri joined12:34
Cabanossi left12:34
kurkale6ka joined12:34
ghost43 joined12:34
Heisenberg joined12:34
Celelibi joined12:34
sarri left12:34
sarri joined12:34
Ellusionist left12:35
Cabanossi joined12:35
devbaka joined12:35
shripadr joined12:37
Bennux_dev left12:38
rebrec joined12:38
enkrypt_ left12:38
enkrypt joined12:38
cteqpan left12:40
adgtl left12:40
juvenal left12:40
ertes-w joined12:41
enkrypt left12:41
jnavila left12:42
sarri left12:42
kurkale6ka left12:42
enkrypt joined12:43
nowhere_man joined12:43
jnavila joined12:43
enkrypt left12:44
enkrypt joined12:45
nowhereman_ left12:47
ogny joined12:47
ogny left12:47
ogny joined12:47
floppydh left12:50
cdg joined12:50
YuGiOhJCJ joined12:50
str joined12:51
luckman212 left12:52
floppydh joined12:52
enkrypt left12:53
darktemprary left12:53
cdg left12:54
darktemprary joined12:54
geoid joined12:55
because left12:56
VolcanoMan joined12:57
because joined12:58
luckman212 joined12:58
Murr left12:59
nowhere_man left12:59
Murr joined12:59
nowhere_man joined13:00
hs366 left13:00
jeffreylevesque left13:01
markmarkmark left13:03
darktemprary left13:04
markmarkmark joined13:04
Heisenberg left13:05
Kaisyu7 joined13:05
darktemprary joined13:05
juvenal joined13:05
Kaisyu7 left13:06
adgtl joined13:06
adgtl left13:06
adgtl joined13:06
adgtl left13:06
adgtl joined13:06
nast left13:06
guideline left13:06
enkrypt joined13:07
darktemprary left13:09
synthroid joined13:09
VolcanoMan left13:10
VolcanoMan joined13:11
h12o joined13:12
snoopdave joined13:13
darktemprary joined13:14
guideline joined13:14
rorro joined13:14
Cabanossi left13:17
YuGiOhJCJ left13:19
Cabanossi joined13:20
darktemprary left13:20
howdoi left13:21
jottr joined13:21
sonOfRa left13:21
darktemprary joined13:22
cdown joined13:23
OnceMe joined13:23
OnceMe I have a local project in git and init it with git init project13:23
I have a remote repo git init project.git --bare13:23
how can I conf local repo to push to the remote one?13:23
git add remote origin?13:23
sonOfRa joined13:24
oxymoron93 git remote add origin <URL_of_remote_repo> OnceMe13:25
OnceMe oxymoron93: Ok Ive added it13:28
however: Warning: push.default is unset; its implicit value has changed in13:28
theoceaniscool left13:30
canton7 read the warning: don't just paste it13:30
VolcanoMan left13:32
nanga left13:32
OnceMe Ill stick with git push -u remote branch13:33
what is the usual setup though?13:33
nanga joined13:34
nanga left13:34
nanga joined13:34
jast the warning is really just for people who used git before 2.0, to let them know the default has changed13:34
cyberz joined13:34
jast the new default is pretty sensible and means you can just use 'git push' without args after using -u once13:34
OnceMe what was the default?13:34
jast it was 'tracking', now it's 'simple'13:34
VolcanoMan joined13:34
jast to suppress the warning, just explicitly set the value to its new default: git config --global push.default simple13:35
sorry, it was 'matching', I meant to say13:35
eshlox left13:36
Puffball left13:36
manuelschneid3r left13:37
Guest63406 left13:37
Guest63406 joined13:37
Guest63406 left13:37
Guest63406 joined13:37
Guest63406matthiaskrgr13:37
jeffreylevesque joined13:37
nowhere_man left13:37
nowhere_man joined13:38
Puffball joined13:38
VolcanoMan left13:39
nanga left13:39
andrbmgi left13:40
nanga joined13:40
VolcanoMan joined13:42
a3Dman joined13:44
kyan left13:44
piremi joined13:47
xaxxon_ left13:48
nanga left13:48
nanga joined13:48
nanga left13:48
nanga joined13:48
Repox left13:49
VolcanoMan left13:49
piremi left13:49
VolcanoMan joined13:49
darktemprary left13:50
sarp left13:51
kurkale6ka joined13:52
darktemprary joined13:53
nanga left13:53
VolcanoMan left13:54
nanga joined13:55
devbaka left13:55
VolcanoMan joined13:55
throstur left13:57
Puffball left13:58
OptimusMKD joined14:01
Puffball joined14:02
cdg joined14:03
theoceaniscool joined14:03
Andr0id joined14:03
_Vi left14:03
OptimusMKD left14:04
basteh left14:04
basteh joined14:05
Tobbi joined14:05
VolcanoMan left14:06
sasheto joined14:06
yohnnyjoe joined14:07
VolcanoMan joined14:07
shripadr left14:08
darktemprary left14:08
synthroi_ joined14:09
Jskal left14:09
darktemprary joined14:09
jnavila left14:10
cdg_ joined14:10
yohnnyjoe left14:11
VolcanoMan left14:11
synthroid left14:12
jnavila joined14:12
VolcanoMan joined14:13
sasheto left14:13
cdg left14:14
Nizumzen left14:16
aard_ joined14:16
VolcanoMan left14:18
justAllgood joined14:19
mattcen left14:21
justAllgood hi folks, I have 2 remotes. Because someone incorrectly converted an old cvs repo into git, we've ended up with an origin (which we can consider the true HEAD of master) and a remote which needs to be merged. However, the remote doesn't share the same history, 'fatal: refusing to merge unrelated histories'. What is the correct workflow, to merge in that branch, but essentially ignore it?14:21
Tobbi left14:21
justAllgood basically when I run git pull remote master, I get that unrelated history14:21
MacGyver If you want to ignore the branch, why merge it?14:22
I'm a bit unclear in what exactly you're trying to do here.14:22
justAllgood well, the other option is to git push remote --delete master right?14:23
mattcen joined14:23
yohnnyjoe joined14:23
justAllgood basically I just want to be able to push our authoritive master14:23
to our remote14:23
but when I delete I get14:23
remote: error: By default, deleting the current branch is denied, because the next14:23
remote: error: 'git clone' won't result in any file checked out, causing confusion.14:23
I'm just wondering what the correct solution is here, there is no important history in the remote branch so deleting it IS an option14:24
aard_ left14:24
aard_ joined14:24
igemnace there is no important history there? just git push --force to that remote14:24
justAllgood ok will try that14:24
canton7 justAllgood, !bare14:24
gitinfo justAllgood: A bare repository is used to push/fetch (useful for running a git server), and contains only the contents of .git/ from a "normal" repo. Read more: http://bare-vs-nonbare.gitrecipes.de/14:24
MacGyver You can --allow-unrelated-histories on a merge, if you'd rather keep the remote's history.14:24
canton7 repos which you push to should be bare14:24
ah, no, it's not referring to that, ignore me14:24
it's referring to deleting the default branch14:25
justAllgood MacGyver: so I saw that, but I thought, that it may merge in unwanted commits14:25
I'm not sure which strat to try haha14:25
MacGyver I *really* don't understand what you're trying to achieve here.14:25
Sounds like you just want to throw away the remote repo entirely.14:25
And just put the correct one in its place.14:26
justAllgood uhh yes that would be an option but I figured it out14:26
you were correct14:26
xaxxon joined14:26
justAllgood git push remote master --force14:26
worked just fine14:26
oxymoron93 what14:26
MacGyver *shrug*14:26
justAllgood tldr; basically we had a repo which we don't control but code must eventually be pushed there to deploy (platform as a service type hosting), while converting from csv, to git, we ended up with 2 different remotes that didn't share a history. I had a branch I wanted to use as the true master HEAD which we wanted to base future releases and work off of, so I needed to do a git push <SecondRemote> master --force14:28
sorry if that wasn't clear but y'all were helpful anyways =P14:28
jeffreylevesque_ joined14:28
jeffreylevesque left14:29
Andr0id left14:29
ghost43 left14:30
clickjac_ left14:30
Andr0id joined14:30
clickjack joined14:30
darktemprary left14:30
igemnace jsyk git push --force *does* do that option (i.e. throw away the remote repo entirely and put the correct one in it)14:30
ghost43 joined14:31
devbaka joined14:31
VolcanoMan joined14:32
darktemprary joined14:33
cur8or left14:34
jungsubk joined14:34
Dougie187 joined14:37
Raging_Hog left14:37
darktemprary left14:37
yohnnyjoe left14:38
jungsubk left14:38
darktemprary joined14:39
Puffball left14:40
tarkus left14:45
Gustavo6046 joined14:46
in1t3r left14:46
converge left14:46
in1t3r joined14:46
dlf42me joined14:47
Andr0id left14:47
rajat joined14:47
dolf joined14:47
Andr0id joined14:47
pirocks joined14:47
Kajayacht joined14:47
dolf left14:49
dlf42me left14:49
dolf joined14:50
dolf left14:50
v4ult joined14:50
dolf joined14:51
dolf left14:51
dolf joined14:51
fission6 joined14:51
dolf left14:51
fmgt joined14:53
Smarticles101 left14:54
POQDavid joined14:55
Dreadnaught left14:56
VolcanoMan left14:56
Smarticles101 joined14:56
VolcanoMan joined14:56
ResidentBiscuit joined14:57
Murr left14:59
thiago joined14:59
frobnic joined15:00
Murr joined15:00
vish93 left15:00
cdg_ left15:00
dolf joined15:00
dolf left15:01
Argylelabcoat joined15:01
Dreadnaught joined15:01
Dreadnaught left15:01
Dreadnaught joined15:01
kurkale6ka left15:01
cdg joined15:02
cdg left15:02
cdg joined15:02
oxymoron93 left15:02
jottr left15:02
kurkale6ka joined15:03
jottr joined15:03
sosheskaz joined15:04
airdisa joined15:04
converge joined15:05
converge left15:05
converge joined15:05
xaxxon left15:05
phinxy left15:05
rkta_ joined15:06
phinxy joined15:06
theoceaniscool left15:07
AaronMT joined15:08
_Vi joined15:08
Andr0id left15:09
rkta left15:09
rkta_rkta15:09
brwoods joined15:10
darktemprary left15:12
jottr left15:12
VolcanoMan left15:13
ogny left15:13
tvw left15:13
enkrypt left15:14
mud joined15:14
jottr joined15:14
phluks joined15:14
darktemprary joined15:14
VolcanoMan joined15:14
fission6 left15:14
dviola joined15:14
ghost43 left15:15
sfranke joined15:15
ghost43 joined15:16
tmsmith joined15:16
shinnya joined15:16
Ben_1 joined15:17
aw1 joined15:18
phinxy left15:19
phinxy joined15:20
pirocks left15:20
JeroenT_ left15:20
theoceaniscool joined15:20
crtcji joined15:21
pirocks joined15:21
cdg left15:22
geoid left15:23
pirocks left15:24
dege left15:24
cdg joined15:24
Ben_1 left15:25
floppydh left15:25
cdg left15:25
pirocks joined15:25
cdg joined15:26
enkrypt joined15:27
floppydh joined15:27
Andr0id joined15:27
Andr0id left15:28
sfranke Heya all! Why would I use 'git fetch && git pull' instead of just 'git pull'?15:29
Andr0id joined15:29
thiago you wouldn't15:29
rajat left15:30
sfranke Something regarding losing the connection during the process?15:30
skypatrol_ joined15:30
jast it makes no sense to assume that from the start IMO15:30
if 'git pull' fails, just do it again :)15:30
if it's due to connection loss at least15:31
heym0e joined15:31
jast 'git pull' is literally 'git fetch' + 'git merge' under the hood, anyway15:31
nowhere_man left15:31
sfranke git fetch followed by git merge FETCH_HEAD <-- from the docs15:31
MrMojit0 left15:31
sfranke just curious what that 'followed by' means^^15:32
jast it fetches and then merges15:32
nowhere_man joined15:32
sfranke '&&' would only execute if the fetch is completed successfully15:32
thiago git pull *literally* runs git fetch15:32
jast yeah, but 'git pull' will still do another fetch internally, so you might as well leave out the first bit15:32
git fetch && git pull means: fetch, then fetch again, then merge15:32
metts left15:33
crose joined15:33
sfranke i eans.. fetch.. only if that succeeds.. fetch again and merge15:33
stutter joined15:33
sfranke +m15:33
jast that's like always starting your car engine twice on the off chance that the first time fails15:33
yeah, but then why bother?15:33
git pull will do the exact same thing again15:34
thiago bad analogy: if you start the car engine, it's running15:34
Andr0id left15:34
sfranke just curious if anything really abd could happen if fetching fais and I pull anyways15:34
jast well, yeah15:34
sfranke *bad15:34
jast no15:34
VolcanoMan left15:34
jast if 'git pull' can't connect or something, it will show an error message and that's that15:34
VolcanoMan joined15:34
jast principle of least surprise and all: 'git pull' is NOT designed to break your repo in a likely error case :)15:35
the reason you'd fetch separately is if you wanted to review what's changed prior to merging15:35
darktemprary left15:35
sfranke what happens to a repository that is in the process of merging.. and DURING that process the connection to the repository is closed?15:36
jast the merge doesn't need a connection15:36
once the fetch part is complete, everything else happens locally15:36
sfranke well.. then during the fetch15:36
jast then the fetch stops15:36
sfranke I have a half completed fetch and start a merge.. what happens?15:36
jast it's ACID: the downloaded data doesn't do anything15:36
fission6 joined15:36
in1t3r_ joined15:36
jast only when the fetch completes is your local data actually updated15:36
darktemprary joined15:37
crose left15:37
vish93 joined15:37
jast internally, the final part of fetch is updating the remote-tracking branches (and FETCH_HEAD)15:37
zefferno left15:38
crose joined15:38
jast so if you skip fetching altogether (which is equivalent to a prematurely aborted fetch), merging would merge what was there before the fetch15:38
(and in all likelihood you've already merged that)15:38
psprint left15:38
charlesr joined15:38
jast merge automatically skips over anything that is already in your local branch15:39
there, all safe :)15:39
anli joined15:39
in1t3r left15:39
dave0x6d joined15:39
charlesr left15:39
crose left15:40
crose joined15:40
abba left15:41
kculpis joined15:42
Dougie1871 joined15:44
crose left15:44
f2k left15:45
crose joined15:45
Dougie187 left15:46
kpease joined15:48
darktemprary left15:49
igemnace left15:49
fission6 left15:50
floppydh left15:51
durham joined15:51
rscata left15:51
fission6 joined15:52
floppydh joined15:52
ianp joined15:53
dreiss joined15:53
Darcidride left15:54
darktemprary joined15:54
Darcidride joined15:55
czart joined15:56
seschwar left15:57
TomyWork left15:59
h12o left15:59
hdaugherty joined16:00
jesst joined16:00
Persondude joined16:01
darktemprary left16:01
tmsmith left16:02
jesst left16:02
aoscott left16:02
finalbeta left16:03
finalbeta joined16:03
darktemprary joined16:04
Cabanossi left16:04
Kajayacht left16:05
Bobguy left16:05
Cabanossi joined16:05
rajat joined16:05
navidr left16:06
kpease left16:07
rorro left16:07
chele left16:08
clmsy left16:09
rorro joined16:10
nowhere_man left16:10
VolcanoMan left16:11
VolcanoMan joined16:12
ianp left16:12
dreiss left16:13
ianp joined16:13
crose left16:14
navidr joined16:14
airdisa_ joined16:14
kpease joined16:15
dege joined16:15
thiago left16:17
igemnace joined16:17
airdisa left16:17
madewokherd joined16:17
synthroi_ left16:18
tkore\work left16:18
synthroid joined16:19
skypatrol_ left16:19
synthroid left16:19
jnavila left16:20
TomyLobo joined16:20
synthroid joined16:20
synthroid left16:20
synthroid joined16:21
synthroid left16:21
synthroid joined16:22
OnceMe left16:22
synthroid left16:22
synthroid joined16:22
synthroid left16:23
synthroid joined16:23
Silmarilion left16:23
metts joined16:23
synthroid left16:24
durham left16:24
durham joined16:25
VolcanoMan left16:25
dec0n left16:26
thierryp left16:26
texinwien_ left16:26
tmsmith joined16:27
texinwien_ joined16:28
wandering_vagran left16:29
durham left16:30
Jskal joined16:30
Mike11 joined16:30
guideline left16:31
darktemprary left16:31
v4ult left16:31
thinkpad left16:32
yohnnyjoe joined16:34
Andr0id joined16:34
durham joined16:35
dreiss joined16:36
darktemprary joined16:37
cagomez joined16:38
h12o joined16:38
yohnnyjoe left16:39
Puffball joined16:40
Mike11 left16:41
VolcanoMan joined16:42
PHPanos left16:42
h12o left16:43
snoopdave left16:43
anli left16:43
vish93 left16:43
airdisa joined16:44
dec0n joined16:46
crtcji left16:47
airdisa_ left16:47
crtcji joined16:48
yehowyada joined16:49
TekMason2 left16:49
converge left16:50
dreiss left16:50
robotroll joined16:51
VolcanoMan left16:51
imack left16:51
kareeeeem joined16:52
upperdeck left16:52
VolcanoMan joined16:53
upperdeck joined16:54
tmsmith left16:54
tarkus joined16:54
applecrumble joined16:55
Guma joined16:56
shinnya left16:56
nixjdm joined16:56
Argylelabcoat left16:56
ResidentBiscuit left16:57
nowhere_man joined16:58
dec0n left16:58
thiago joined16:59
Murr left16:59
Murr joined17:00
db8093246 joined17:00
rorro left17:01
sfranke well.. thanks so far.. have a nice evening!17:01
sfranke left17:01
crtcji left17:02
Cabanossi left17:03
rorro joined17:04
snowkidind joined17:04
robotroll left17:05
aLeSD joined17:05
aLeSD hi all17:05
Cabanossi joined17:05
kareeeeem Hi I have a question regarding the official git prompt and a code execution vulnerability. A while ago something came up regarding a vulnerability and it was said that the official prompt was safe. However I just did `PS1='[\u@\h \W$(__git_ps1 " (%s)")]\$ '`. and entered this repo https://github.com/njhartwell/pw3nage that I cloned (which is a proof of concept for the vulnerability) and it's still vulnerable. It's not17:05
vulnerable when I put it in my PROMPT_COMMAND however. Any ideas?17:05
aLeSD is it possible to remove the last n commit in my master branch and make them one bit commit ?17:06
s/bit/big17:06
kareeeeem Im running bash 4.4.12 and git 2.15.017:06
moritz aLeSD: yes, you can use rebase -i HEAD~5 or something like that, and then use the squash or fixup feature17:07
aLeSD: but if you've already pushed these commits, it's a !rewrite17:07
gitinfo aLeSD: Rewriting public history is not recommended. Everyone who has pulled the old history will have to do work (and you'll have to tell them to), so it's infinitely better to just move on. If you must, you can use `git push --force-with-lease <remote> <branch>` to force (and the remote may reject that, anyway). See http://goo.gl/waqum17:07
bnason_ joined17:08
bnason_bnason17:08
bnason I'm trying to fix some branches pushed by another dev onto our repo, they should all be directly off the master branch, but instead they all were branched from the previous branch that person pushed.17:09
I tried rebasing, but it seems to keep all intermediate commits in that branch.17:10
I want to make each branch be master -> lsat commit for that branch17:11
How can I go about doing that?17:11
schleppel left17:11
moritz bnason: I'm not sure, but maybe git rebase --onto can help you with that17:11
guideline joined17:12
bnason i already did a rebase but its keeping the extra intermediate commits17:12
i basically want to remove the intermediate commits from each branch17:12
aw1 left17:12
schleppel joined17:12
Guma left17:13
diverdude joined17:13
bnason hmm ah maybe an interactive rebase will work17:13
diverdude if i want to make a branch B from branch A, do i then first checkout A and then do git branch B?17:14
moritz diverdude: yes, but there's also a shortcut17:14
heym0e left17:14
moritz git branch A B17:14
erm, other way around17:14
h12o joined17:14
moritz or git checkout -b B A17:14
stutter left17:15
h12o left17:20
pirocks left17:22
re1 left17:23
ZexaronS joined17:23
mentalita left17:23
malditasea joined17:23
darktemprary left17:24
hdaugherty left17:25
DaGoaty joined17:25
aw1 joined17:25
darktemprary joined17:25
sea-gull left17:25
upperdeck left17:26
VolcanoMan left17:26
VolcanoMan joined17:27
upperdeck joined17:27
pirocks joined17:28
aLeSD left17:29
dviola left17:30
aLeSD joined17:31
pirocks_ joined17:32
svm_invictvs left17:33
VolcanoMan left17:34
mentalita joined17:35
tmm88 joined17:35
tmm88 left17:35
tmm88 joined17:35
banisterfiend joined17:35
pirocks left17:35
h12o joined17:36
skylite left17:37
worstadmin joined17:37
ToBeFree joined17:37
cstratak left17:37
ToBeFree left17:38
MarioBranco left17:39
kurkale6ka left17:41
Plouescat joined17:41
h12o left17:41
Bobguy joined17:42
converge joined17:42
converge left17:42
converge joined17:42
argnoor joined17:43
nowhere_man left17:43
kyan joined17:43
floppydh left17:43
DaGoaty left17:43
darktemprary left17:44
DaGoaty joined17:44
murii_ left17:45
_Vi left17:45
arora joined17:45
darktemprary joined17:45
imack joined17:46
Persondude left17:46
arora hey, suppose i made changes to a repo, how can i keep them only to my local repo and have them merge when git pulled?17:46
moritz arora: you just don't "git push"17:46
svm_invictvs joined17:46
moritz that way they stay local automatically17:46
murii joined17:46
gugah joined17:47
Tobbi joined17:47
safe joined17:48
aLeSD left17:48
DaGoaty left17:49
arora moritz: but it gives me error, that they will be overwritten because of merge17:49
akushner joined17:50
thierryp joined17:50
davimore_ left17:50
aLeSD joined17:50
orbyt_ joined17:50
moritz arora: you might need to "git add" and commit your files17:51
stutter joined17:51
tmsmith joined17:52
arora its a github repo so wouldnt it commit to the original repo(not owned by me)?17:52
thierryp left17:53
DaGoaty joined17:53
satifant joined17:54
igemnace it would commit to your local repo17:54
osse arora: Committing is only local17:54
darktemprary left17:54
danemacmillan Would anyone here know of a good way to have an entire existing repo code reviewed (on GitHub), such that I can treat the entire codebase as though it were a pull request and everything can be commented on?17:55
LichtMacher left17:55
darktemprary joined17:55
h12o joined17:56
Tobbi left17:57
DaGoaty left17:58
arora thanks osse, moritz and igemnace :)17:58
benmuirhead joined17:58
benmuirhead left17:59
freimatz left18:00
converge left18:00
DaGoaty joined18:01
h12o left18:01
flaviodesousa left18:01
muelleme joined18:01
malditasea left18:02
tobiasvl danemacmillan: why do you need that?18:03
jiruru joined18:03
rorro left18:06
Spydar007 joined18:07
_ADN_ left18:07
devbaka left18:08
muelleme left18:08
cdown left18:09
paul424 joined18:13
chaosruler joined18:13
jiruru left18:14
aLeSD left18:15
h12o joined18:16
justAllgood left18:16
glebihan left18:17
Scoop7 joined18:18
Scoop7 hey, can I get git diff all~ ? not just for the exact filename ?18:18
aLeSD joined18:18
Kaisyu left18:18
_ikke_ Scoop7: sorry?18:19
aLeSD moritz, I was thinking to create a branch than merge from master without history than make the branch the master., then push. is it possible ?18:19
DaGoaty left18:20
Scoop7 well I've made some changes in my local project to let's say 2 files18:20
texinwien_ left18:20
Scoop7 and I don't want to specify it's path18:20
just see all the diff (so for those 2 files)18:20
texinwien_ joined18:20
h12o left18:20
Scoop7 +_ikke_18:20
_ikke_ Scoop7: Do you mean you want to just specify the filename, not the entire path?18:21
Floflobel left18:21
Scoop7 not really I would like to just see all18:21
igemnace Scoop7: do you mean get a diff of *all* changes?18:21
sea-gull joined18:21
Scoop7 yes18:21
igemnace git diff by itself does that already18:21
Scoop7 oh18:21
great18:21
lol18:21
ResidentBiscuit joined18:21
rajat left18:24
murii left18:27
dviola joined18:27
sim590 left18:28
shawn_ges careful with that - it would diff your working directory against the current HEAD, which may not be what you want.18:29
sim590 joined18:29
cdown joined18:30
ocds joined18:30
tmsmith left18:30
tmsmith joined18:31
jottr left18:32
paul424 I hardly rested my work , how do I find the orphaned nodes ?18:32
s/hardly/hard18:32
banisterfiend left18:32
DaGoaty joined18:32
darktemprary left18:33
dendazen joined18:33
darktemprary joined18:34
orbyt_ left18:34
ocds left18:34
osse paul424: git reflog18:35
igemnace if you committed them at some point in time, reflog18:35
yohnnyjoe joined18:35
paul424 osse: igemnace thansk18:35
Ellusionist joined18:36
h12o joined18:36
Natsume joined18:36
jiruru joined18:38
jiruru left18:38
darktemprary left18:38
_Vi joined18:38
jiruru joined18:39
darktemprary joined18:39
yohnnyjoe left18:40
h12o left18:40
cagomez left18:41
durham left18:41
durham joined18:42
rafasc joined18:44
phinxy left18:44
devbaka joined18:45
pasadinhas joined18:45
crose joined18:45
TheG0ldenG0d joined18:46
TheG0ldenG0d left18:46
finalbeta left18:47
anli joined18:47
wootehfoot joined18:47
finalbeta joined18:47
heym0e joined18:50
phinxy joined18:50
cagomez joined18:51
smak joined18:52
foo left18:52
scientes joined18:53
boombatower joined18:54
smak I am looking for advice. I have a datafile that is important to my project up to a certain version. After that point it no longer needs to be part of the repo, but it HAS to exist if a version prior is checked out. How can remove and stop tracking a file for all new commits, but keep it in the repo for checkouts for prior versions?18:54
jiruru left18:55
muelleme joined18:55
Seveas smak: git rm path/to/file && git commit -am "Remove file not needed in newer versions"18:55
moritz smak: if you simply git rm the file, that will be exactly what happens18:55
it's there when you check out the old versions, and not there on the new version18:55
h12o joined18:55
smak Seveas: moritz: thanks. The way I parsed git rm was that it completely removes the file from the repo18:56
justAllgood joined18:57
BSab left18:57
energizer joined18:57
tmsmith left18:57
Seveas no, git rm does not affect history18:58
very few things do, on purpose :)18:58
moritz .oO( rm -rf .git does :-) )18:59
DaGoaty left18:59
Murr left18:59
Murr joined19:00
darktemprary left19:00
h12o left19:00
AaronMT left19:00
bremner also smashing disk with a hammer, if you want to be like that19:01
darktemprary joined19:01
Sasazuka joined19:02
Angelica joined19:02
Angelica left19:02
tobiasvl moritz: the man-page of `git rm` _does_ mention /bin/rm ...19:03
heym0e left19:03
Natsume left19:03
eijk left19:04
smak Thanks again...19:06
sammyo joined19:07
nowhere_man joined19:08
fmgt left19:09
TinkerTyper left19:10
Ellusionist left19:11
_ADN_ joined19:11
arabbear joined19:12
Ellusionist joined19:12
cdown left19:12
TinkerTyper joined19:12
|ifei5good left19:12
rtjure joined19:13
darktemprary left19:13
ericho joined19:14
theoceaniscool left19:15
darktemprary joined19:16
mostlybadfly joined19:16
pasadinhas left19:17
imack left19:18
rtjure left19:18
raynold joined19:19
orbyt_ joined19:20
LichtMacher joined19:22
Ellusionist left19:22
Ellusionist joined19:23
Discovery joined19:23
h12o joined19:25
darktemprary left19:27
Discovery left19:28
Discovery joined19:28
AndresInSpace joined19:29
darktemprary joined19:29
LocaMocha left19:29
AndresInSpace anyone know what would cause my git repo to fail on pushing up commits that contain binary (images) ? AS well as start effecting my SFTP (filezilla)?19:29
jiruru joined19:29
h12o left19:30
AndresInSpace git started failing and now when I sftp images up i get disconnects and the image gets half uploaded , swear they are related issues they both started same time19:30
overlord_tm left19:31
Ellusionist left19:32
Cabanossi left19:32
darktemprary left19:33
Gurkenglas joined19:33
phluks left19:34
jiruru left19:35
Cabanossi joined19:35
mecasou joined19:35
MrJoshua joined19:35
cdg_ joined19:35
smak left19:35
Discovery left19:38
cdg left19:38
cdg_ left19:40
Darcidride left19:41
Discovery joined19:41
Seveas what are the error messages you get from git and sftp?19:43
Ellusionist joined19:44
AndresInSpace sftp software disconnected, then it reconnects to server and asks to overwrite file(which is new file i just uploaded)19:44
git is broken pipe, sometimes just remote end hangup19:44
super weird part, is if i sftp up through winscp it seems to work fine, at the moment19:45
at a loss, as my other git directories work fine, and is just this one, which if it was broken git config or something, how the ef would that effect SFTP?19:45
pirocks joined19:46
Seveas smells like your ssh remote does not like large files19:46
check its logs, if possible19:46
pirocks_ left19:48
Acerific joined19:48
Acerific left19:48
Acerific joined19:48
AaronMT joined19:48
arora left19:48
AndresInSpace Seveas: its just odd, as just a copuple weeks ago i was pushing up commits with MUCH larger binary data19:49
worked fine, just all the sudden one day it started doing this19:49
orbyt_ I have a branch, "develop", with commits 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. I'd like to remove commit 1 and 2 from the branch, so that the first commit on the branch is 3. Is there a simple way to go about this?19:49
Seveas AndresInSpace: find out what changed on the remote on that day :)19:49
orbyt_: !interactive rebase19:49
gitinfo orbyt_: [!interactive_rebase] Interactive rebase sounds similar to rebase but has completely different abilities. It can do this to commits: change the order, squash some of them together, remove some, add random existing commits from other branches, split them, and more... it's very powerful. Documentation is in the section "Interactive Rebase" in 'man git-rebase'.19:49
Ellusionist left19:50
Seveas orbyt_: git rebase -i sha1-of-commit-1^ (the ^ is important!)19:50
arora joined19:50
mel00010 joined19:50
Seveas then remove 1 and 2 from the picklist and let it rip19:50
DaGoaty joined19:51
achadwick left19:51
cdg joined19:51
banisterfiend joined19:53
orbyt_ Seveas So with an interactive rebase, what's the difference between using "drop" and deleting the line entirely?19:54
h12o joined19:55
tlaxkit joined19:55
_ikke_ orbyt_: originally you just deleted the line, but that was not obvious enough for some people, so they added an explicit drop19:55
tmsmith joined19:55
orbyt_ Thank you.19:55
cdg left19:56
dege left19:58
PaulCapestany left19:59
aw1 left19:59
rorro joined20:00
h12o left20:00
sartan joined20:02
PaulCapestany joined20:02
banisterfiend left20:02
ZyX-I joined20:03
sartan is there a way to combine the output of 'git diff --name-only' (changes not staged) with 'git diff --name-only --cached' (changes to be committed) in the same command?20:03
writing a git hook to run on all 'changed' files regardless if they're added to changeset or not, whatever is different from upstream20:03
_ikke_ sartan: git diff HEAD --name-only20:04
sartan Perfect thanks20:04
h12o joined20:05
sartan any way to have it also show the new name of a file if it's been renamed? (Seems to show the old one)20:06
applecrumble left20:06
rorro left20:06
madewokherd left20:06
db8093246 left20:06
orbyt_ left20:06
scientes left20:07
applecrumble joined20:08
rafasc left20:08
_ikke_ it should show both20:08
Seveas with --name-only?20:09
h12o left20:09
behr328 joined20:09
_ikke_ Seveas: was that adressed to me or to sartan ?20:09
Seveas _ikke_: to you :)20:09
fission6 left20:10
Seveas --name-status shows both names, but --name-only not20:11
Martian joined20:11
Seveas e.g. this in git.git:20:11
git --no-pager show --format= --name-only 0c977dbc8180892af42d7ab9235fd3e51d6c407820:11
git --no-pager show --format= --name-status 0c977dbc8180892af42d7ab9235fd3e51d6c407820:11
the latter shows both names20:12
salamanderrake joined20:12
_ikke_ Hmm, I would expect it to show 2 descrete names20:12
Ellusionist joined20:13
tmsmith_ joined20:13
_ikke_ Like this:20:14
git --no-pager show --format= --name-only --no-renames 0c977dbc8180892af42d7ab9235fd3e51d6c407820:14
But due to rename detection, it gets lumped together20:14
Seveas yup20:15
sartan: so --no-renames is the answer to your question20:15
sartan Thanks, lemme play with it. I can tool and script around htis, just trying to minimize work20:16
pirocks_ joined20:17
tmsmith left20:17
jungsubk joined20:18
mattcen left20:18
pirocks left20:19
AndresInSpace Seveas: how would i check the remote if it 'doesn't like large files' as you said20:20
to confirm that essentially20:20
DaGoaty left20:21
endiruna joined20:21
Cavallari left20:21
Seveas if you have ssh access to it: check logs and ssh config. If not: ask the admin.20:22
mattcen joined20:24
upperdeck left20:24
synthroid joined20:24
arabbear left20:25
kgrimes1 joined20:26
upperdeck joined20:27
stutter left20:27
ph88 joined20:28
ph88 hey guys, i see i'm doing a merge but how do i start my merge tool ? (meld20:28
AndresInSpace Thanks Seveas20:28
I'm trying everything, having my coworker check the server (not my cup of tea)20:29
pasadinhas joined20:29
grothe joined20:30
_ikke_ ph88: do you have a merge conflict?20:31
banisterfiend joined20:33
cagomez left20:33
Scoop7 left20:33
Cabanossi left20:33
pasadinhas left20:34
h12o joined20:34
Cabanossi joined20:35
tmsmith_ left20:36
yohnnyjoe joined20:36
orbyt_ joined20:37
Masber joined20:37
phluks joined20:38
h12o left20:39
stutter joined20:39
jt__ joined20:40
Plouescat left20:40
dviola left20:40
Masber_080 left20:40
jt__Guest3380620:40
yohnnyjoe left20:40
Masber_080 joined20:41
Masber left20:41
sasheto joined20:43
upperdeck left20:43
daynaskully left20:44
upperdeck joined20:44
banisterfiend left20:45
cousteau left20:45
pirocks joined20:46
rorro joined20:47
pirocks_ left20:48
paulg joined20:50
ph88 _ikke_: yes i had, but manual merge was easier ... meld was confusing :(20:50
yes i found the command20:50
git mergetool20:50
banisterfiend joined20:51
fission6 joined20:52
WhitePhosphorus joined20:53
hockeyfan99 joined20:53
hockeyfan99 left20:54
_ikke_ :-)20:55
cdg joined20:57
thierryp joined20:58
theoceaniscool joined20:59
thierryp left20:59
Barrt left21:00
cdg left21:00
cdg joined21:01
banisterfiend left21:01
Barrt joined21:02
madewokherd joined21:03
h12o joined21:04
akushner left21:06
Barrt left21:06
beastd joined21:07
beastd left21:07
Barrt joined21:07
Ellusionist left21:08
h12o left21:08
Discovery left21:09
davimore joined21:09
energizer left21:10
db8093246 joined21:10
texinwien_ left21:11
cdg_ joined21:14
dendazen left21:14
DaGoaty joined21:15
AndresInSpace Seveas: it is not the server21:15
:(21:16
cdg left21:17
mattcen left21:17
glebihan joined21:18
codyw joined21:19
bruce_lee left21:20
DaGoaty left21:20
orbyt_ left21:20
Person joined21:21
grothe left21:21
sosheskaz left21:21
mattcen joined21:22
yuop12 joined21:24
ph88 left21:24
yohnnyjoe joined21:25
orbyt_ joined21:27
jnavila joined21:29
yohnnyjoe left21:30
Guest33806 left21:30
daynaskully joined21:30
applecrumble left21:30
jj995 left21:31
pwnz0r joined21:32
Cabanossi left21:32
orbyt_ left21:33
h12o joined21:34
ResidentBiscuit left21:34
jeffreylevesque joined21:34
jeffreylevesque_ left21:35
Cabanossi joined21:35
yuop12 left21:36
jeffreylevesque_ joined21:36
applecrumble joined21:36
Cabanossi left21:37
ResidentBiscuit joined21:37
Cabanossi joined21:37
kyan left21:38
h12o left21:38
jeffreylevesque left21:39
Person left21:40
fission6 left21:40
cagomez joined21:40
stutter left21:41
MeiR joined21:41
kareeeeem left21:41
kgrimes1 left21:42
scientes joined21:45
paul424 left21:46
jottr joined21:46
gugah left21:47
crose left21:47
pirocks_ joined21:47
stutter joined21:47
nowhereman_ joined21:49
pirocks left21:49
nowhere_man left21:49
imack joined21:51
akushner joined21:53
synthroid left21:53
akushner left21:54
jeffreylevesque_ left21:55
stutter left21:55
akushner joined21:55
hellux left21:56
akushner left21:57
DaGoaty joined21:58
jnavila left21:58
DaGoaty left22:01
WhitePhosphorus left22:01
akushner joined22:02
akushner left22:03
h12o joined22:03
akushner joined22:03
Jskal left22:04
phluks left22:05
Gustavo6046 left22:05
kgrimes1 joined22:06
Cuzner left22:07
h12o left22:08
manuelschneid3r joined22:09
pwnz0r left22:09
Gustavo6046 joined22:09
jottr_ joined22:10
devbaka left22:10
jottr left22:11
rh10 joined22:12
netj left22:13
netj joined22:13
schleppel left22:13
duderonomy joined22:13
darktemprary joined22:13
kgrimes1 left22:17
Tobbi joined22:17
kgrimes1 joined22:19
mattcen left22:20
xz joined22:20
xz hi there, I'm using repo tool and I'm putting custom manifest file under .repo/manifests/my-custom-manifest.xml22:21
does the name or directory of my-custom-manifest.xml matter? or repo will pick it up as long as it's somewhere under .repo/ ?22:21
rh10 left22:23
rh10 joined22:24
heym0e joined22:25
causasui left22:26
muelleme left22:26
lafleurdubien joined22:26
orbyt_ joined22:27
behr328 left22:28
Xrayez left22:28
mizu_no_oto joined22:28
mattcen joined22:28
endiruna left22:30
sclarkso joined22:31
ResidentBiscuit left22:31
yu joined22:31
causasui joined22:31
WhitePhosphorus joined22:32
banisterfiend joined22:34
Munt joined22:34
yu left22:35
upperdeck left22:36
dvl /j #poudriere22:36
navidr left22:36
AndresInSpace left22:37
upperdeck joined22:37
mniip left22:38
TomyLobo left22:38
fstd_ joined22:39
btree_ left22:39
Dougie1871 left22:40
behr328 joined22:40
jottr_ left22:42
fstd left22:42
fstd_fstd22:42
thiago left22:44
Enphuego joined22:46
fission6 joined22:48
darktemprary left22:48
thiago joined22:49
darktemprary joined22:50
[Brain] joined22:50
AaronMT left22:50
behr328 left22:50
thiago left22:51
tmm88 left22:51
gopar joined22:52
btree joined22:53
btree left22:54
shinnya joined22:55
theoceaniscool left23:00
supernov2h left23:00
supernov1h joined23:00
jeffreylevesque joined23:01
nowhereman_ left23:02
wootehfoot left23:03
thinkpad joined23:06
darktemprary left23:07
piremi joined23:07
gopar_ joined23:07
applecrumble left23:08
argnoor left23:09
gopar left23:09
thiago joined23:09
dviola joined23:10
piremi left23:10
darktemprary joined23:10
pirocks_ left23:10
piremi joined23:10
piremi left23:11
Kaisyu joined23:12
Munt left23:13
gopar joined23:15
piremi joined23:15
piremi left23:15
piremi joined23:16
imack left23:16
piremi left23:17
piremi joined23:17
Cabanossi left23:17
gopar_ left23:18
overlord_tm joined23:20
Cabanossi joined23:20
jcarpenter2 joined23:21
svm_invictvs left23:24
darktemprary left23:25
nowhereman_ joined23:25
yohnnyjoe joined23:26
svm_invictvs joined23:26
aard_ left23:26
markus_ joined23:28
snowkidind left23:28
satifant left23:29
dviola left23:30
markus_ left23:30
mel00010 left23:30
Morphy joined23:30
yohnnyjoe left23:30
dviola joined23:32
Morphy left23:32
heym0e left23:33
Morphy joined23:33
Phylock left23:33
Acerific left23:35
dfaught left23:36
ZexaronS left23:36
Martian left23:37
sasheto left23:37
ZyX-I left23:37
ZexaronS joined23:38
sasheto joined23:39
basteh left23:40
chaosruler left23:41
Gustavo6046 left23:42
dendazen joined23:43
db8093246 left23:44
cagomez left23:45
cagomez joined23:45
ResidentBiscuit joined23:47
diverdude left23:48
joey_ left23:48
joey_ joined23:48
joey_ left23:49
joeyy joined23:49
rax_ joined23:50
cagomez left23:50
unreal left23:50
rax_ left23:51
Martian joined23:51
cagomez joined23:52
ResidentBiscuit left23:52
aLeSD left23:53
YuGiOhJCJ joined23:55
thinkpad left23:56
airdisa left23:57
rax_ joined23:58

Logs Search ←Prev date Next date→ Channels Documentation