IRCloggy #git 2019-12-12

Provider of IRC logs since 2005.

WARNING: As Freenode became unjoinable and lost all warnings in topics, we cannot log channels on Freenode anymore.

	2019-12-12
	← thiago left	00:00
	← CryptoDavid left	00:08
	← CarlFK left	00:13
	← Kremator left	00:14
	← silverwhitefish left	00:16
	← feriman left	00:17
	← Phylock left	00:18
	← IAmNetx left	00:19
	← Copenhagen_Bram left	00:19
	→ sidetrack joined	00:19
	← sidetrack left	00:23
	→ sidetrack joined	00:23
	→ jfariasf joined	00:24
	→ Copenhagen_Bram1 joined	00:24
	Copenhagen_Bram1 → Copenhagen_Bram	00:25
	← fahadash left	00:26
	← sidetrack left	00:28
	← n3wborn left	00:34
	→ Viridian joined	00:40
	← Viridian__ left	00:41
	→ fphilipe joined	00:42
	← fphilipe left	00:47
	← CipherMethod left	00:48
foo	Looking for someone to confirm my understanding: if I'm on branchA and I want to update it with staging, in branchA I do: git rebase staging. In this scenario, I'm rebasing branchA onto staging. When I get a conflict, and it says <<<<<<< HEAD ... it's referring to staging, correct?	00:50
	I believe yes on both questions	00:50
	← mowcat left	00:56
	← saint_ left	00:57
	→ mowcat joined	00:57
	→ saint_ joined	01:00
	← mowcat left	01:03
	→ mowcat joined	01:05
_0x40_	How do I delete all local branches from a single remote? I did `git fetch $remote` instead of `git fetch $remote $branch_i_wanted` and now I have like 200 branches.	01:10
	← agowa338 left	01:11
_0x40_	(I want to delete them ONLY from .git, and not from the remote as well, just to be clear)	01:11
	→ physikoi joined	01:16
	→ omnireq joined	01:16
	← Codaraxis left	01:17
	→ ethernether joined	01:20
	ChanServ set mode: +o	01:21
	← physikoi left	01:21
	← ethernether left	01:22
	Eugene changed the topic to: Welcome to #git \| First visit? https://gitirc.eu \| Current stable version: 2.24.1 \| Getting "cannot send to channel"? /msg gitinfo .voice \| This channel is logged: https://gitirc.eu/log \| git happens	01:22
	Eugene kicked Eugene (de-op)	01:22
	→ Eugene joined	01:22
bin_bash	...	01:23
	Eugene: you know you can just de-op yourself.. right? you don;t have to kick youself from the channel...	01:23
Eugene	If I had a nickel for every time somebody said that, I'd have about three fiddy	01:23
	→ ethernether joined	01:23
bin_bash	well you should try it	01:24
	← ethernether left	01:25
bin_bash	it's not a good look to kick yourself to de-op	01:25
phy1729	you should add a bot trigger to count up the nickles	01:25
	← Copenhagen_Bram left	01:25
bremner	bin_bash: I think you probably worry too much. Eugene can take care of itself.	01:25
bin_bash	nah it's not a worry	01:26
Eugene	I like how much time people talk about it	01:26
	→ ethernether joined	01:26
bremner	craves attention, that bot	01:26
bin_bash	more like it's a bad look for the channel is the operators don't know basic commands, so figured better to say something than nothing	01:26
	¯\_(ツ)_/¯	01:26
Eugene	OoooOoooh, the operator karma reasoning, that's a new one.	01:27
bin_bash	karma?	01:27
	how is it karma in any way?	01:27
	← ethernether left	01:27
	→ milkt joined	01:28
	→ ethernether joined	01:29
	→ ExeciN joined	01:31
	→ orbyt_ joined	01:33
	→ thiago joined	01:39
	← duderonomy left	01:39
	→ duderonomy joined	01:40
	→ fphilipe joined	01:42
	← duderonomy left	01:45
	← fphilipe left	01:48
	→ akemhp_ joined	01:49
	← vrih left	01:50
	→ akem__ joined	01:51
	← akemhp left	01:52
	← mat001 left	01:52
	← akemhp_ left	01:54
	← Sasazuka left	01:54
	← zalt_ left	01:56
	← mowcat left	01:57
	→ jaziz1 joined	01:58
	← kerframil left	02:01
	← jaziz left	02:01
	← jfariasf left	02:02
	→ vrih joined	02:08
	← Mindi left	02:10
	← vostok4 left	02:11
	← ethernether left	02:13
	→ ethernether joined	02:13
	← utrack left	02:13
	← anddam left	02:16
	→ lightstalker joined	02:17
	← ethernether left	02:18
	→ vostok4 joined	02:18
	→ ethernether joined	02:19
	→ utrack joined	02:20
	→ maestrojed joined	02:23
	← lucasb left	02:23
	→ Mindi joined	02:24
	← maestrojed left	02:24
	← plasticle left	02:27
foo	fffOB/w 2	02:28
	→ plasticle joined	02:28
	→ anddam joined	02:29
	→ z8z joined	02:31
	→ deltab joined	02:32
	→ Copenhagen_Bram joined	02:32
Copenhagen_Bram	Is a wiki on a github project a part of the git repo?	02:32
	Or is the wiki purely a github feature?	02:32
foo	Repeat, I believe this is relatively simple for someone experienced: Looking for someone to confirm my understanding: if I'm on branchA and I want to update it with staging, in branchA I do: git rebase staging. In this scenario, I'm rebasing branchA onto staging. When I get a conflict, and it says <<<<<<< HEAD ... it's referring to staging, correct?	02:33
	Basically looking for "yes, that's correct" :)	02:33
	→ maestrojed joined	02:34
foo	Nevermind. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23207791/git-rebase-conflict-who-is-head explains it... HEAD is actually neither. This sums it up: "Again, HEAD or local or --ours is a commit that rebase has built by combining your changes and their changes, and the other commit (remote or >>>>>>> or --theirs) is your own commit, which rebase is trying to copy atop HEAD."	02:37
	→ physikoi joined	02:40
	← F0rTex left	02:40
	→ F0rTex joined	02:41
	← dionysus69 left	02:43
	← howdoi left	02:44
thiago	Copenhagen_Bram: there's no wiki feature in Git. That's a GitHub feature.	02:46
Copenhagen_Bram	ah	02:46
	← phy1729 left	02:47
Copenhagen_Bram	I discovered you can clone a wiki from github though	02:47
thiago	foo: what does it say in the >>>> line?	02:47
Copenhagen_Bram	Although I tried and it asked me for my github username	02:47
foo	thiago: it says my branch name that is causing the conflict (that's likely in branchA and not in staging)	02:49
	thiago: that is what leads me to believe that HEAD is in staging... but it turns out it's not actually in staging)	02:50
	← omnireq left	02:51
	← ethernether left	02:55
	← oatmealraisin left	02:59
	→ Sasazuka joined	03:01
	→ fstd_ joined	03:05
	→ sidetrack joined	03:06
	→ Wetmelon joined	03:09
	← fstd left	03:09
	fstd_ → fstd	03:09
	→ Codaraxis joined	03:11
	← sidetrack left	03:11
	← dartmouthed left	03:15
thiago	foo: HEAD isi the commit you are right now (staging)	03:17
	the remote is what was on your branch and is being re-applied	03:17
	→ juhwad__ joined	03:19
foo	thiago: oh, but I thought it wasn't that black-and-white, I thought head was constructed from... hmm. ok	03:20
	← jaziz1 left	03:21
	← Cabanossi left	03:28
	→ ezzzc joined	03:32
	→ def_jam joined	03:34
	→ eb0t_ joined	03:34
	← eb0t left	03:35
	→ Cabanossi joined	03:35
	← eblip left	03:35
	→ fphilipe joined	03:44
	← Viridian left	03:46
	← physikoi left	03:48
	← fphilipe left	03:49
	→ spacefrog joined	03:51
	← ezzzc left	03:58
	→ sidetrack joined	03:59
	lagothrix → Guest1120	03:59
	← Guest1120 left	03:59
	→ aw1__ joined	04:00
	→ lagothrix joined	04:00
	← aw1_ left	04:01
	← caskd left	04:03
	← sidetrack left	04:03
	→ caskd joined	04:04
	→ duderonomy joined	04:04
	→ alezandro joined	04:08
	← cbreak left	04:09
	→ cbreak joined	04:10
	← oxguy3 left	04:10
	→ nav2002 joined	04:12
	← Giant81 left	04:13
	← Codaraxis left	04:17
	← vostok4 left	04:18
	→ vostok4 joined	04:18
	← maestrojed left	04:19
	→ sidetrack joined	04:24
	→ maestrojed joined	04:28
	Copenhagen_Bram → Elon_Sat0shi	04:28
	← fk left	04:29
	← sidetrack left	04:29
	→ fk joined	04:29
	← maestrojed left	04:30
	← rafasc left	04:35
	→ oxguy3 joined	04:57
	← Furai left	04:58
	→ Furai joined	05:00
	→ pks_ joined	05:01
	→ igemnace joined	05:04
	← pks left	05:04
	pks_ → pks	05:04
	← Sasazuka left	05:12
	← jlosito left	05:15
	← bket left	05:15
	→ jlosito joined	05:16
	← bvdw left	05:18
	→ bket joined	05:18
	→ bvdw joined	05:19
	← envex left	05:20
dysfigured	i've made myself a "starter-kit" repo to bootstrap web projects from, and i have a few branches on it with various different features (eg master is just plain react, i have an express branch, and an apollo branch with ssr) and levels of "complexity" but i'm pretty much just re-doing the same work in different branches because it's easier than dealing with merge conflicts, and i can't help feeling like	05:20
	i'm missing out on crucial git features for this kind of thing but i don't know what i don't know, can anybody point me in the right direction?	05:20
	← dmc left	05:32
_ikke_	dysfigured: I don't think using branches for these things is the right way tgo	05:35
dysfigured	i mean they're all (supposed to be just) slight variations of the backend for the same react app, which is why it made sense to use branches	05:37
	→ planetcall\|work joined	05:37
	→ crose joined	05:37
	→ zalt_ joined	05:38
dysfigured	(at least in my mind anyway)	05:38
	→ sidetrack joined	05:38
_ikke_	yes, but like you noticed, it's difficult to keep each branch up-to-date	05:38
	you need to costantly either merge or rebase	05:39
	for each branch	05:39
dysfigured	so instead of using git branches, i should continue re-doing the same work but in different repositories?	05:40
	← Inline left	05:41
	← crose left	05:42
	→ crose joined	05:42
	← sidetrack left	05:42
	→ Helenah joined	05:44
	→ fphilipe joined	05:45
	← fphilipe left	05:50
dysfigured	i'm also trying to avoid big giant commits that change too many things, any tips on breaking this habit?	05:50
	→ mikami joined	05:50
_ikke_	try to commit early and often (which is hard)	05:51
	use tools that let you easily select what the commit	05:51
	→ dmc joined	05:53
	→ omnireq joined	05:58
	← axisys left	06:07
	→ axisys joined	06:08
	← ilmostro left	06:08
	→ ilmostro joined	06:11
	← jcbitter left	06:12
	→ Mattiaslndstrm joined	06:24
	→ IAmNetx joined	06:26
	← orbyt_ left	06:26
	← zalt_ left	06:30
	→ sauvin joined	06:30
	→ Noti joined	06:30
	→ sidetrack joined	06:31
	→ Stace joined	06:35
	← sidetrack left	06:36
	← localhorse left	06:37
Stace	hi all, I'm reviewing a pull request for the first time in github and their code has a couple of errors. Obviously I reject it, but can I make a new commit on their branch to fix it or is that frowned upon?	06:38
	reject it as in not merge it	06:38
	Stace isn't familiar with the ettiquette of git pull requests.	06:39
	← Mattiaslndstrm left	06:39
pandem1	depends on your team but i would not make a new commit there, but rather let the original author fix it	06:39
	or if they don't have time discuss about it and if you agree then fix it	06:40
	→ Mattiaslndstrm joined	06:40
Stace	pandem1: on thanks. They're on a different team from me - I'm actually a hardware designer - so I don't really deal with this stuff often.	06:49
	*ok	06:49
	→ sidetrack joined	06:51
	← sidetrack left	06:56
Timvde	Is there a way to easily reset to the origin branch with the same name without actually having to type the branch name? (like you can use `git push origin HEAD` to push)	06:59
	→ envex joined	06:59
	← gxt left	07:00
	← gavlee left	07:05
	→ TomekStano joined	07:07
	→ gavlee joined	07:10
	← oxguy3 left	07:10
	→ sidetrack joined	07:11
	← tmz left	07:12
	→ g00s joined	07:13
	→ Codaraxis joined	07:14
	→ oxguy3 joined	07:14
	← sidetrack left	07:16
	→ omnireq_ joined	07:19
	← omnireq left	07:21
	← akem__ left	07:25
	→ thevishy joined	07:25
	← thevishy left	07:26
	→ chele joined	07:30
	→ gloomy joined	07:32
	→ monr0e joined	07:33
	← maxwilliamson left	07:34
	→ maxwilliamson joined	07:35
	→ sQVe joined	07:37
	→ fphilipe joined	07:37
	→ n3wborn joined	07:42
	→ sidetrack joined	07:42
	→ a-l-e joined	07:44
	← thiago left	07:45
	→ rfuentess joined	07:45
a-l-e	hi... i have a merge conflict after "git stash pop". now, i just want to "reset" the one conflicting file to the master... any hint?	07:46
	→ thevishy joined	07:46
a-l-e	can i do "git reset filename"?	07:47
	← sidetrack left	07:47
Moongoodgirl	`git checkout master -- file` will clobber the file in the working tree with the version from master (make sure you don't have any uncommitted changes)	07:48
	→ Phylock joined	07:49
	← thevishy left	07:49
a-l-e	following the hint to use "git restore --staged" seems to have solved the issue...	07:50
	→ TomyLobo2 joined	07:59
	→ Belliash joined	08:03
	→ Jackneill joined	08:04
	→ reprazent joined	08:05
	← gloomy left	08:06
	→ gloomy joined	08:07
	→ jayjo joined	08:08
	← nav2002 left	08:15
	→ sidetrack joined	08:16
	← Wetmelon left	08:17
	→ flaviodesousa joined	08:18
	← shabius_ left	08:21
	← sidetrack left	08:21
	← cluelessperson_ left	08:23
	→ cluelessperson joined	08:24
	→ Fernando-Basso joined	08:24
	→ Wetmelon joined	08:27
	← Ring0` left	08:28
	→ EdFletcherT137 joined	08:33
	← Belliash left	08:34
	→ Belliash joined	08:35
	← causasui left	08:37
	→ gxt joined	08:38
	→ pastucci joined	08:43
	← macaronus left	08:44
	← iam730 left	08:45
	→ sbeyer joined	08:46
	→ oxymoron93 joined	08:46
	→ Paradisee joined	08:47
	→ iam730 joined	08:48
	← z8z left	08:48
	→ lacrymology joined	08:48
	→ Nozzzle joined	08:48
	→ shabius joined	08:50
	→ dionysus69 joined	08:50
	← wagle left	08:55
	← warthog9 left	08:55
	→ warthog19 joined	08:55
	→ raven-au_ joined	08:56
	← raven-au left	08:56
	← gordonfish left	08:56
	raven-au_ → raven-au	08:56
	warthog19 → warthog9	08:57
	→ wagle joined	08:57
	← juhwad__ left	08:57
	→ mobidrop joined	08:59
	→ xall joined	09:01
	← Wetmelon left	09:06
	→ multiproc joined	09:09
	→ rajputh54 joined	09:10
	→ nivag joined	09:10
	← SJr left	09:10
rajputh54	I'm using an open source code and then changing url to private repository.	09:11
	← Helenah left	09:11
rajputh54	But later how to fetch updates from open source repo ?	09:12
	→ kanzure joined	09:12
_ikke_	rajputh54: you can have more then one remote	09:12
	→ SJr joined	09:13
	→ floppydh joined	09:13
rajputh54	_ikke_ Thank you ... I'll try this	09:14
	→ feriman joined	09:14
	← Stoot left	09:15
	← azwieg103 left	09:16
	→ T_UNIX joined	09:16
	→ azwieg103 joined	09:16
	→ Helenah joined	09:16
	← oxguy3 left	09:19
	→ border_man joined	09:19
	→ oxguy3 joined	09:21
Moongoodgirl	As I understand it, the customary names are `origin` and then `upstream`.	09:25
	← feriman left	09:25
	← fphilipe left	09:26
	→ feriman joined	09:27
	← babilen left	09:28
	→ babilen joined	09:29
	← oxguy3 left	09:31
	→ Tobbi_ joined	09:35
	← border_man left	09:37
	→ oxguy3 joined	09:38
	← random_yanek left	09:38
	← Fernando-Basso left	09:44
	← g00s left	09:44
	→ random_yanek joined	09:45
	→ dartmouthed joined	09:47
	← sbeyer left	09:47
	→ sbeyer joined	09:48
	→ akemhp joined	09:48
	← akemhp left	09:52
	→ fphilipe joined	09:54
	→ rfuentess__ joined	09:57
	← rfuentess left	09:58
	→ akemhp joined	10:00
	← xall left	10:12
	→ rfuentess joined	10:20
	← rfuentess__ left	10:20
	→ tmz joined	10:20
	→ mikecmpbll joined	10:27
	← oxguy3 left	10:28
	→ figuinhas joined	10:40
	→ courrier joined	10:53
	→ jmd joined	10:53
	← oxymoron93 left	10:53
	← courrier left	10:53
	→ oxymoron93 joined	10:54
	← sauvin left	10:57
	→ sauvin joined	10:59
	→ xall joined	10:59
	→ wrksx_ joined	11:01
	← wrksx left	11:02
	→ enoq joined	11:05
	→ mowcat joined	11:09
	← TomekStano left	11:11
	← bvdw left	11:18
	→ bvdw joined	11:19
	← rajputh54 left	11:24
	→ cdown joined	11:27
	→ Sc0tty- joined	11:35
	← azwieg103 left	11:35
Sc0tty-	what does -u mean with `git push -u origin master`	11:35
	→ azwieg103 joined	11:35
Sc0tty-	is it --set-upstream ?	11:35
_ikke_	yes	11:35
Sc0tty-	thank ya	11:36
	← reprazent left	11:39
	→ howdoi joined	11:42
	← mowcat left	11:47
	→ dionysus70 joined	11:53
	← Phylock left	11:53
	← dionysus69 left	11:54
	dionysus70 → dionysus69	11:54
	← xall left	11:54
	→ xmiah joined	11:56
xmiah	file pack at ./git/object/pack/pack-*.pack so big. How to clean cache it? I search git log of pack-name commit but not found	11:58
jmd	Which git command is it that has a --ignore-dates option?	11:58
osse	seems like the answer is none	11:59
	→ aw1_ joined	12:00
jmd	perhaps it's --ignore-date (singular)	12:00
	→ reprazent joined	12:00
xmiah	jmd: options --ignore-date not found, I checked 'man git'	12:01
gitinfo	jmd: the git manpage is available at https://gitirc.eu/git.html	12:01
osse	jmd: rebase and am	12:02
	← aw1__ left	12:02
jmd	osse: Thanks.	12:03
osse	jmd: each command has its own man page btw. man git-rebase	12:03
gitinfo	jmd: the git-rebase manpage is available at https://gitirc.eu/git-rebase.html	12:03
	← multiproc left	12:05
	← Nozzzle left	12:06
	→ multiproc joined	12:06
	→ Phylock joined	12:06
	← lacrymology left	12:07
jmd	osse: Yeah. That's why it's so difficult to find what one is looking for.	12:07
	← Helenah left	12:08
osse	jmd: But how often do you look for the command that uses a specific option compared to how often you look for the options for a specific command?	12:08
	→ Helenah joined	12:10
	→ courrier joined	12:10
jmd	I dunno, but sometimes I do that. So a more modern documentation format (such as Texinfo or similar) would make things easier.	12:10
bremner	kek, texinfo modern	12:14
	← sbeyer left	12:16
	← maxwilliamson left	12:17
	→ maxwilliamson joined	12:19
	→ greatgatsby joined	12:19
	← nivag left	12:22
	→ sim642 joined	12:23
sim642	Is it just me or if I revert a range and the first one has a conflict which I manually fix and stage and use --continue, then git has forgotten about all the other commits in the range that were to be reverted?	12:23
_ikke_	sim642: that should not be the case	12:28
	wrksx_ → wrksx	12:42
sim642	Not sure what I could've done wrong then	12:43
	→ phanimahesh joined	12:57
	gitinfo set mode: +v	12:57
	← gloomy left	13:01
	→ oatmealraisin joined	13:02
	← multiproc left	13:12
	→ Nozzzle joined	13:13
	→ multiproc joined	13:14
	← igemnace left	13:18
	→ SerialSmile joined	13:19
	→ CodeSlingerPaul joined	13:19
	← xmiah left	13:21
	→ jrun joined	13:24
	← courrier left	13:27
jrun	git stash says no local changes but git diff shows changes in .git/module what's going on?	13:29
Nozzzle	be,	13:29
	sorry	13:29
	hello, I need help with my first-ever deployment on web server.	13:30
	I created a .git folder via cpanel	13:30
	← pastucci left	13:30
Nozzzle	so I suppose it is the remote repository that I need to create, right?	13:31
grawity	do you have SSH access to that web server?	13:31
Nozzzle	grawity, yes	13:31
grawity	then use `git` via SSH – don't create things like .git by hand	13:31
Nozzzle	and the tutorial i follow says that I need to have ssh-agent in order not to have to type password.	13:31
grawity	well, possibly, but that's a bit separate from git configuration	13:32
Nozzzle	currently I know nothing about git, I can say. I am following a tutorial in order to move a local folder to the web server.	13:34
	and it says I need to have ssh agent	13:34
	which has the keys added	13:34
	→ computer2000 joined	13:36
	← feriman left	13:36
	← enoq left	13:39
	→ g4570n joined	13:40
Nozzzle	ok I think I added it	13:41
	→ gloomy joined	13:46
	← jim left	13:50
	← SerialSmile left	13:50
	→ finalbeta joined	13:50
	→ jim joined	13:51
	→ SerialSmile joined	13:51
	→ mattmurr_ joined	13:51
	← SerialSmile left	13:51
	→ oxguy3 joined	13:51
	← Thorn left	13:53
	← aw1_ left	13:53
	→ mrcrypto08 joined	13:53
	← cdown left	13:59
	← greatgatsby left	13:59
	→ cdown joined	14:00
	→ akemhp_ joined	14:05
	→ lucasb joined	14:06
	← akemhp left	14:06
	→ akem__ joined	14:07
	← akemhp_ left	14:10
	← TomyLobo2 left	14:16
	← oxguy3 left	14:23
	← mattmurr_ left	14:31
	→ maestrojed joined	14:33
ashnur	someone told me i should rebase to keep my feature branch clean, but right now i am trying to rebase and it keeps starting over, i see the same conflicts over and over and over again in a loop	14:37
	→ prepend joined	14:37
	→ truthseeker_ joined	14:39
	← jmd left	14:39
cdunklau	ashnur: gimmie the deets yo	14:42
ashnur	?	14:42
cdunklau	the details	14:42
	first, what command did you run	14:43
jim	is it possible to append to the message of the latest commit?	14:43
ashnur	git rebase branchname	14:43
cdunklau	jim: you can edit it with --amend	14:43
	→ thevishy joined	14:43
cdunklau	dunno about appending though	14:43
jim	git commit --ament?	14:43
	d	14:43
ashnur	cdunklau: so after rebase i got conflict, i changed the file, saved and then added them, then git rebase --continue	14:44
	then sometimes git rebase --skip if it's empty	14:44
	and continue doesn't work	14:44
cdunklau	jim: yes	14:44
oxymoron93	it will prompt the editor for you, with existing message of last commit, you just add whatever you want. About automating, I have no idea. jim	14:44
cdunklau	ashnur: "doesn't work"?	14:45
jim	no, it need not be automated	14:46
cdunklau	ashnur: cmon you know how IRC works :)	14:46
ashnur	cdunklau: i am assuming you used this before and you know when you write git rebase continue and it doesn't do shit just says to try skip, well i talk about that	14:46
jim	I'll give it a shot	14:46
cdunklau	ashnur: ...jesus chill out. you know it's impossible to help with any confidence if one party doesn't know what the other is experiencing	14:47
	ashnur: so show us	14:47
	my best guess is "you didn't fix the conflict"	14:47
	which is also not helpful to you	14:48
ashnur	i did fix it	14:48
	i tried it twice before i asked here	14:48
cdunklau	ashnur: what did it say, precisely, when you did --continue	14:48
Hello71	"it doesn't work"	14:50
ashnur	cdunklau: https://gist.github.com/ashnur/e11451767accea0931610623373a2c6c	14:51
cdunklau	ashnur: what's git status output	14:51
ashnur	right, that was then, i aborted long time ago	14:52
	you never see this message?	14:52
	every time i do rebase it's full of this	14:52
	even years ago when i did it first time, this was part of it	14:52
	so i don't understand what is so surprising	14:52
	but there was no conflict, no files to change or anything	14:54
	anyway, i will try to recreate it	14:54
	← mikami left	14:54
cdunklau	ashnur: no, i haven't run into this, at least i don't remember running into it. --abort, fix the conflict, run `git status`, `git rebase --continue`, and pastebin the terminal session	14:54
ashnur	do you do rebase often?	14:54
cdunklau	err, --abort, rebase again, etc of course	14:54
ashnur	there is no conflict cdunklau if i --abort	14:55
	only if rebase	14:55
	i could fast forward merge	14:55
cdunklau	yes, i corrected my instructions	14:55
	--abort, rebase again, fix the conflict, run `git status`, `git rebase --continue`, and pastebin the terminal session	14:55
	← maestrojed left	14:58
cdunklau	ashnur: also, `git log --oneline --decorate --graph branchname..` and the same except with `..branchname` can be enlightening	14:59
	maybe --stat instead of --oneline	14:59
ashnur	?	15:00
	can be enlightening	15:00
oxymoron93	jim git commit --amend -m "your message"	15:00
	in your script you could grab message of the amended commit, and afterwards build new message by appending to it	15:01
	use this in mentioned command... there probably are much better ways	15:01
ashnur	i bet there is no tool to sanitize commit messages	15:02
	or just git output	15:02
	→ maestrojed joined	15:03
ashnur	cdunklau: https://gist.github.com/ashnur/af92c12ec8c706cc9f134aba85af90cb	15:03
	→ feriman joined	15:06
	← oxymoron93 left	15:07
	→ juhwad__ joined	15:07
ashnur	so i am saying git rebase --continue but it says no changes, did i forget to add? and i didn't, there were no changes, there are no files	15:07
	← gloomy left	15:08
ashnur	git status stays everything clean, i should --continue, but --continue says that there isn't anything to do	15:08
	it "doesn't work"	15:08
	but you can be an asshole about it	15:08
	← Anthaas left	15:08
	→ zalt_ joined	15:08
BtbN	That can mean that the commit was a no-op, since all of its changes were already done. So you can skip it.	15:08
ashnur	BtbN: that's what I was doing, but then eventually I get back here and the rebase never ends	15:10
cdunklau	ashnur: well, with that info someone else might be able to help. which is good, because i sure as hell don't want to even try	15:10
	best of luck	15:10
relipse2	I'm on windows, how do I add another repo as a remote to this one and then cherry pick one of the commits?	15:10
	using git bash	15:10
	← maestrojed left	15:10
osse	ashnur: was it git rebase --skip you tried?	15:10
ashnur	osse: yes, why?	15:10
_ikke_	relipse2: you can use git remote add <name> <url> to add a new remote	15:10
	relipse2: then run git fetch <name>	15:10
	after that, you can cherry-pick the commit by hash	15:11
osse	ashnur: I wasn't sure	15:11
ashnur	osse: then i can continue but as I was saying, eventually the commits repeat without the rebase ending	15:11
osse	you can run git rebase --skip a million times? :O That sounds like a bug in git rebase	15:12
	→ Anthaas joined	15:12
ashnur	osse: no, after skip i get the normal function of rebase, there is a conflict, i fix, i --continue	15:13
	osse: just that, as i mentioned before, the commits repeat, the rebase never ends	15:13
	i will get back to the beginning of the conflicts. git log will have the same commit messages repeated in order	15:14
osse	so after you've resolved commit 6 it tries to apply commit1 again?	15:14
	could it be that because of pripr rebases and pushing and pulling you do actually have a bunch of seemingly identical commits in the history?	15:15
ashnur	pripr?	15:15
	prior. maybe	15:15
osse	prior	15:15
ashnur	i probably have similar commits but not with the same commit message	15:16
	since these are some test files and i was switching back and forth	15:16
	→ Kremator joined	15:16
osse	if you can, git rabase --abort and start over with the -i flag, so that you get an editor with the list of commits to rebase	15:16
ashnur	good idea, thanks for reminding me, i will try it out	15:17
mobidrop	git: 'rabase' is not a git command. See 'git --help'.	15:17
osse	git rhubarb	15:18
	← ed_peguillan left	15:18
	← gxt left	15:19
	→ ed_peguillan joined	15:21
	→ n2o joined	15:21
	← howdoi left	15:23
	← n2o left	15:24
	← omnireq_ left	15:24
	← oatmealraisin left	15:26
lavalike	is it possible to serialize git commits into files that apply to a different repo (from the same file contents, albeit possibly different git hashes because of authorship and dates) that keep their commit metadata like the commit date? i.e. replicate the history, git hashes notwithstanding, with the same commit metadata and contents, on top of a different history (different just in some metadata like	15:27
	authorship)	15:27
Nozzzle	hello, I am following this guide to run a local website folder on a server; http://toroid.org/git-website-howto	15:28
jim	lavalike, I guess, you could commit to the usual git repo first, then get a patch from it to apply elsewhere	15:28
Nozzzle	I keep getting 'error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://...'	15:28
_ikke_	lavalike: sounds a lot like git format-patch	15:28
lavalike	interesting	15:29
Nozzzle	the error comes when I run 'push web +master:refs/heads/master'	15:29
jim	so that would be man git-format-patch ?	15:29
gitinfo	the git-format-patch manpage is available at https://gitirc.eu/git-format-patch.html	15:29
	← Stace left	15:30
	→ greggerz joined	15:35
	→ Raging_Hog joined	15:36
	→ thiago joined	15:36
	← Frogging101 left	15:37
	→ Frogging101 joined	15:39
	→ boombatower joined	15:40
	← to1ne left	15:43
	→ xmiah joined	15:44
Moongoodgirl	<Nozzzle> I keep getting 'error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://...'	15:46
	pastebin the rest of the output?	15:46
	← sQVe left	15:46
	← dunpeal left	15:49
	← flaviodesousa left	15:50
	← zalt_ left	15:50
ashnur	so, i think i stop using rebase. i have no idea what is happening but it clearly conflicts with my flow many ways. i just realized that i am getting duplicated commits out of it, that's why i saw the same conflicts repeatedly	15:54
	found the answer i think https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9264314/git-commits-are-duplicated-in-the-same-branch-after-doing-a-rebase	15:56
	→ sperry joined	15:56
	→ Thorn joined	15:59
	← floppydh left	16:01
	← mrcrypto08 left	16:01
_ikke_	trhlkjdkjdsdkfjsdlfk	16:02
	k	16:02
	ugh	16:02
	my vpn connection died one way apparenly :(	16:02
	→ darkbit joined	16:02
	← darkbit left	16:02
	← thiago left	16:04
	← akem left	16:05
	→ akem joined	16:05
	← akem left	16:05
	→ omnireq joined	16:06
	→ cvcxc joined	16:06
	→ submerciful joined	16:09
Nozzzle	Moongoodgirl, the error is like ''error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://mysite.com/home/mysitename/addondomainname/somefolder.git'	16:09
	→ mowcat joined	16:09
Moongoodgirl	Nozzzle: Is that /all/ the output you get? Just that one line? O.o	16:10
Nozzzle	Moongoodgirl, I am trying to run a locally created website on my hosted server, following this guide; http://toroid.org/git-website-howto...after typing 'git push -f origin master' I get above error.	16:12
	Also before that I got this error, too; https://bpaste.net/show/I5KUS	16:12
	← chele left	16:14
	← Noti left	16:16
	← alexandre9099 left	16:18
	← mobidrop left	16:20
	← cvcxc left	16:27
	→ Lucas_Gray joined	16:32
	→ g00s joined	16:32
	→ to1ne joined	16:34
Nozzzle	can anyone help me get forward with this?	16:35
	→ alexandre9099 joined	16:39
	→ oatmealraisin joined	16:43
	← cdown left	16:47
	→ cdown joined	16:47
	← Sc0tty- left	16:48
jim	Nozzzle, maybe it could help the folks here understand better if you start over, and let them know what you're doing (I can't include myself in that, because I'm just using git for basic stuff, not web deployment, at least not yet	16:50
	)	16:50
	→ armin joined	16:52
	→ durham joined	16:52
armin	so my boss just linked me to this article here https://tech.churchofjesuschrist.org/wiki/Git_Credential_Caching_on_Mac_OS_X is that a running joke or something? i mean that site is, just in fact, hosted on churchofjesuschrist.org - i can't just believe that's without ulterior motive.	16:53
	← gpanders left	16:54
	→ usbguy1 joined	16:55
	← rardiol left	16:55
_ikke_	armin: how are we supposed to know? :)	16:55
	← usbguy1 left	16:56
	← saint_ left	16:57
	→ rardiol joined	16:58
	← rfuentess left	16:59
	→ mikami joined	17:00
	→ saint_ joined	17:01
	→ Giant81 joined	17:03
	→ thiago joined	17:03
	→ gpanders joined	17:05
armin	_ikke_: i feel a bit cursed. i think i'll ask him on the x-mas company event after a beer or so what that should mean.	17:08
	→ jleclanche joined	17:09
	← maxwilliamson left	17:10
	← Lucas_Gray left	17:12
	→ maxwilliamson joined	17:13
	← learningc left	17:14
Nozzzle	jim, thank you very much. I created a Nikola website locally. Nikola is a static site generator. I followed this guide to deploy it; http://toroid.org/git-website-howto, but got stuck at the last push command, getting the above error	17:16
	← bvdw left	17:18
	→ wildlander joined	17:19
	→ bvdw joined	17:19
	← thevishy left	17:21
	← figuinhas left	17:22
	← computer2000 left	17:23
jim	Nozzzle, the permission denied you're getting from running mkdir in /var/www is because usually only root can write there	17:23
	← wildlander left	17:28
	→ mat001 joined	17:31
Nozzzle	jim, should I run it with sudo?	17:31
	→ wildlander joined	17:31
	← cdown left	17:33
	→ cdown joined	17:34
	→ causasui joined	17:35
	← mikecmpbll left	17:39
	→ bluesoul joined	17:44
	→ wootehfoot joined	17:45
	← alezandro left	17:46
	← Phylock left	17:51
	← to1ne left	17:53
	← sperry left	17:58
	→ gareppa joined	17:58
	← maxwilliamson left	17:58
	→ maxwilliamson joined	17:59
	→ sperry joined	17:59
	← gareppa left	17:59
	→ to1ne joined	18:02
	← dartmouthed left	18:04
	← vicfred left	18:06
	→ cdown_ joined	18:06
	← cdown left	18:09
	cdown_ → cdown	18:09
	← lightstalker left	18:10
	→ gordonfish joined	18:11
	→ ferdna joined	18:12
	→ KnoP joined	18:12
	← causasui left	18:14
	→ enoq joined	18:14
	→ learningc joined	18:14
	→ alezandro joined	18:17
	→ causasui joined	18:17
	→ sidetrack joined	18:18
	→ igemnace joined	18:20
	→ gareppa joined	18:21
	→ gloomy joined	18:22
	← sidetrack left	18:22
	→ oxguy3 joined	18:22
	← gloomy left	18:25
	← gareppa left	18:26
bin_bash	NO	18:26
	you should setup permissions properly.	18:26
	→ gloomy joined	18:26
	→ sidetrack joined	18:27
	← multiproc left	18:27
	→ scurfee joined	18:33
	→ gareppa joined	18:34
	← rardiol left	18:35
	← mikami left	18:36
	→ rardiol joined	18:37
	← shored left	18:38
	→ oatmealr1 joined	18:39
	→ shored joined	18:40
	← gareppa left	18:40
	← a-l-e left	18:41
	← oatmealraisin left	18:42
	→ a-l-e joined	18:43
	← a-l-e left	18:43
	→ a-l-e joined	18:44
	← scurfee left	18:44
	← oatmealr1 left	18:50
	→ saul joined	18:52
	→ testman joined	18:52
	gitinfo set mode: +v	18:53
	← KnoP left	18:53
	← dionysus69 left	18:53
saul	Hi, I've got a strange situation with a repo. I made some changes to some text files, and when it looks like it's being treated as a git annex item when i view the pull request in stash/bitbucket. It seems like a git annex issue, not dependent on stash/bb itself.	18:54
	in the PR it looks like all the text is gone and replaced with a git annex SHA	18:54
	← Paradisee left	18:57
j416	saul: is there a question?	18:57
	← truthseeker_ left	19:00
saul	How can I get my file into a regular state, ignored by git annex?	19:02
	← Nozzzle left	19:03
	→ Parse joined	19:04
	→ howdoi joined	19:05
j416	saul: don't use git-annex?	19:15
	→ Sasazuka joined	19:15
	← T_UNIX left	19:15
	← xmiah left	19:16
	← Sasazuka left	19:16
	→ Sasazuka joined	19:17
	← sweatsuit left	19:17
	← Sasazuka left	19:17
	→ gxt joined	19:18
	→ Sasazuka joined	19:19
	← prepend left	19:21
	→ jamiejackson joined	19:21
	← Sasazuka left	19:22
	→ sweatsuit joined	19:22
	→ Sasazuka joined	19:23
	← sauvin left	19:24
	← testman left	19:26
	← APic left	19:29
	← Raging_Hog left	19:32
	← durham left	19:32
	← ferdna left	19:35
	→ ferdna joined	19:37
	→ APic joined	19:38
lavalike	U dud	19:43
	(oops, hit the keyboard wrong there) I did git am *.patch and between two of those I have this message: https://pastebin.com/raw/tMp2aE9E	19:43
saul	j416: work on your material	19:43
lavalike	does it apply to the patch above or below it?	19:43
j416	saul: sorry, what does that mean?	19:43
	→ rindolf joined	19:46
lavalike	I suppose it applies to the one above, i.e. it writes Applying: <commit title> and then the warning, not the reverse	19:46
j416	lavalike: I was going to write that I'd assume that, but I realise it might as well be the other way round. It does seem logical that it'd be the one before it.	19:47
	→ prepend joined	19:47
	→ cd joined	19:47
lavalike	I'll reset and try one at a time to figure it out	19:47
j416	I wonder if you could enable tracing and that would help	19:48
	GIT_TRACE=1 etch	19:48
	etc.	19:48
lavalike	our intuition was confirmed correct: it's Applying: <name> and then the relative warnings	19:49
	← a-l-e left	19:49
rindolf	Hi all! Suppose I want to clone certain sub-repositories, but pin them at certain commits so I'll get consistent results - are submodules the way to go?	19:49
	← planetcall\|work left	19:49
j416	lavalike: cool. thanks.	19:49
	rindolf: what's a sub-repository?	19:50
	rindolf: and, what is the use-case?	19:50
	← Murr left	19:50
j416	submodules make sense in some cases, but in my experience most of the time there's a better solution	19:51
rindolf	j416: i keep the sources for stories / screenplays (see https://www.shlomifish.org/humour/stories/ ) in separate github repos and clone them from within the main site's build sys	19:54
lavalike	_ikke_: thanks for the pointer to format-patch it worked beautifully!	19:54
	← Mattiaslndstrm left	19:54
robertparkerx	This means it was reverted right? https://d.pr/i/8jpHoW	19:55
j416	robertparkerx: so it seems.	19:55
robertparkerx	How do I revert it back	19:55
	← juhwad__ left	19:55
j416	a reversion is just a regular commit.	19:55
	→ mat001_ joined	19:56
j416	you can choose to revert the revert (git revert 3ad4d), for example.	19:56
	why was it reverted? the commit does not say	19:56
robertparkerx	git revert 3ad4d66f0bef5470f0d978b853b1e6a9b1bd9f98	19:56
j416	it's useful to note.	19:56
robertparkerx	I don't know	19:56
j416	robertparkerx: sure.	19:56
robertparkerx	I started to get emails	19:56
j416	robertparkerx: maybe ask Meng	19:56
robertparkerx	haha	19:57
	← prepend left	19:59
	← mat001 left	19:59
	→ oatmealr1 joined	20:04
robertparkerx	ty j416	20:04
j416	o/	20:04
	→ lightstalker joined	20:06
	→ DogManJr joined	20:09
	← azwieg103 left	20:09
	→ azwieg103 joined	20:09
	← pks left	20:09
	→ Narrat joined	20:10
	← mat001_ left	20:12
	→ mat001 joined	20:13
	→ akemhp_ joined	20:18
	→ srg joined	20:19
srg	Hi. I'm trying to create a commit from within a CI system. I'm using `git commit --author="Automation [email@hidden.address] -m "Sync with upstream"` but git is returning an error saying "Please tell me who you are". How can I override it?	20:20
	← jamiejackson left	20:22
	← akem__ left	20:23
cdunklau	srg: ...is that the entire error?	20:24
srg	Well, no, but I figure the people here are familiar enough with it. Want me to pastebin it?	20:24
cdunklau	srg: yes	20:24
srg	https://gist.github.com/srguglielmo/603626e04c2ab3ef2e6336d9f123ea0e	20:25
	← sperry left	20:25
cdunklau	huh. i thought it might be complaining about email, but you provided it	20:26
	odd	20:26
srg	I mean, I could just add the `git config` commands to my CI script, but that seems unecessary with the --author option	20:26
	← oatmealr1 left	20:26
	← Codaraxis left	20:27
cdunklau	srg: i think that's for _overriding_	20:27
squirrel	isn't author different to committer?	20:27
cdunklau	srg: but you can specify it via env vars. i'd probably do that	20:28
	srg: git help config and search for user\.name	20:28
	→ oatmealr1 joined	20:28
squirrel	https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32676281/bypass-tell-me-who-you-are-error-in-git	20:29
srg	Ah! I didn't think of ENV vars, yeah good idea. I don't see a --committer option for `git commit`	20:29
cdunklau	squirrel: i thought so	20:29
	← enoq left	20:29
	→ dknitrox joined	20:29
cdunklau	but git help commit says "commit author"	20:29
	← dknitrox left	20:29
cdunklau	which is not all that decisive :)	20:29
srg	"As of git 2.12.2, this fails if the default isn't set." this is a comment on that stackoverflow question - so you're right cdunklau, it's only for _overriding_	20:30
	Thank you both!	20:30
cdunklau	\o/	20:30
squirrel	woo	20:31
j416	and there was much rejoicing	20:32
	→ prepend joined	20:32
	← akemhp_ left	20:37
	→ elsheepo joined	20:38
	→ m0viefreak joined	20:41
	→ arcanescu joined	20:43
arcanescu	i have a commit which has been pushed onto my branch which is in the past, how can I modify the past commit to exclude a file which I accidently commited?	20:44
	→ Crell joined	20:44
Crell	Hi folks. I'm trying to figure out why I am getting a merge conflict.	20:45
	My local repo is a clone of A. I then add a remote for B, which doesn't have common history. I then run git merge --allow-unrelated-histories -X theirs --squash some-tag. 99% of the time this works perfectly and does exactly what I want. But with one particular case, I am getting 3 files that don't merge cleanly due to "both added" (according to Git).	20:46
	If both add the file... shouldn't -X theirs resolve that? And... why would they be added by both when I'm just merging ONE remote into local?	20:46
	→ Nozzzle joined	20:47
	→ sperry joined	20:47
	→ mat001_ joined	20:47
	← cdown left	20:48
	→ pks joined	20:50
	← mat001 left	20:50
	← elsheepo left	20:54
	→ mat001 joined	20:56
	→ localhorse joined	20:56
	→ emmanuelux joined	20:58
	← mat001_ left	21:00
	← Nozzzle left	21:03
	← gloomy left	21:03
	→ _homme__ joined	21:04
	← arcanescu left	21:05
	← srg left	21:06
	← emmanuelux left	21:07
	← rindolf left	21:08
	→ akemhp joined	21:11
	→ akemhp_ joined	21:11
	← akemhp left	21:15
	← DogManJr left	21:16
cdunklau	Crell: i think you meant -s theirs	21:22
	hm no	21:22
	← sidetrack left	21:22
	← akemhp_ left	21:23
cdunklau	Crell: is it doing a recursive merge	21:25
	if not, -X theirs won't have an effect, i suspect. if i'm reading the merge manpage right, rerursive is the only one with options	21:26
	uh, 'recursive' of course	21:27
	← prepend left	21:28
	→ sidetrack joined	21:31
	← mat001 left	21:32
	← cd left	21:33
	→ DogManJr joined	21:34
	→ cd joined	21:35
Crell	This is part of a build script which works for 50 other repositories where I'm doing the same. It's JUST this one where it's not.	21:36
	← CalimeroTeknik left	21:37
Crell	According to the diff after I try the merge, the only difference is those 3 files have perms 755 now instead of 644. But... Both remotes and my local have perms 644 on those files, so I don't know why it's trying to change perms.	21:37
	← andreas303 left	21:37
	→ Fernando-Basso joined	21:38
Crell	And if I manually change them to 755 and commit first, then the merge command works.	21:38
	← giaco left	21:43
	→ andreas303 joined	21:43
	← Narrat left	21:43
	← howdoi left	21:43
	→ mat001 joined	21:43
	← relipse2 left	21:44
	→ dartmouthed joined	21:50
zebrag	Can I convert a very small project to a text file suitable for a pastebin?	21:51
	→ relipse2 joined	21:51
Moongoodgirl	Some pastebins let you do multiple files	21:52
	← to1ne left	21:52
Moongoodgirl	If yours doesn't, you could just concatenate the files with a marker before each one and pastebin that	21:53
	that's fine if you just need to show the files to some people in a casual way	21:53
zebrag	Sure; maybe what I'm looking for is sth like "tar"	21:53
grawity	there's this pastebin called gist.github.com	21:53
Moongoodgirl	you could use MIME instead, which is more formal\|proper and machine-readable	21:54
grawity	where you can literally `git push` a very small project into a pastebin	21:54
Moongoodgirl	Or you could pastebin a diff from an empty directory, which is probably easier while also being proper and machine-readable	21:54
	And yeah, Gist is one of the ones that does multiple files	21:54
zebrag	yes, gist seems good	21:55
Moongoodgirl	GitHub Gists are actually fully-fledged git repositories, which is pretty nice	21:55
	← g00s left	21:55
Moongoodgirl	…I guess that's kinda implied by the ability to `git push` into them, heh	21:57
	← mat001 left	21:58
	→ Narrat joined	21:58
	← monr0e left	22:00
	→ mat001 joined	22:00
	← mat001 left	22:00
	← jlosito left	22:02
	← fphilipe left	22:02
	← Fusl left	22:03
	← swalladge left	22:04
	→ Fusl joined	22:04
	→ hqdruxn08_ joined	22:05
	← null1337 left	22:09
	← hqdruxn08__ left	22:09
	→ to1ne joined	22:12
	→ fphilipe joined	22:13
	← crose left	22:16
	→ Phylock joined	22:17
	← fphilipe left	22:17
	← to1ne left	22:18
	← oatmealr1 left	22:20
	← Phylock left	22:22
	← feriman left	22:23
	→ to1ne joined	22:25
	← to1ne left	22:29
	→ feriman joined	22:33
	→ mat001 joined	22:33
	→ swalladge joined	22:40
	→ fragamus joined	22:41
	← Sasazuka left	22:45
	→ Sasazuka joined	22:47
	← preisi left	22:48
	← wildlander left	22:48
	→ preisi joined	22:51
	→ to1ne joined	22:54
	← Helenah left	22:55
	← ZachGibbens left	22:55
	→ Helenah joined	22:57
	→ robinb joined	22:58
	→ ZachGibbens joined	22:58
	← azwieg103 left	22:59
	→ rsrx joined	23:00
	→ Mattiaslndstrm joined	23:00
robinb	let's say I have a branch1 which is in review but I need to use that branch commit for a new branch2 how can I do this? Also when the branch1 is merged I wanna remove that commit or update it.	23:00
	← greggerz left	23:02
	← Mattiaslndstrm left	23:02
	← anddam left	23:04
	← cliluw left	23:06
	← Sasazuka left	23:06
	→ Nixerus joined	23:06
	← wootehfoot left	23:06
	→ cliluw joined	23:06
	→ fstd_ joined	23:06
	→ reprazen_ joined	23:07
	← mowcat left	23:07
	→ anddam joined	23:07
	→ wootehfoot joined	23:07
	→ FernandoBasso joined	23:07
	→ Codaraxis joined	23:07
	← _homme__ left	23:07
	← _xor left	23:07
	→ Sasazuka joined	23:07
	→ _xor joined	23:07
	← oxguy3 left	23:08
	← Kremator left	23:08
	← Cerise left	23:08
	← fxrs left	23:08
	→ Xeago_ joined	23:08
	← lucasseikioshiro left	23:08
	← qguv left	23:08
	← wootehfoot left	23:08
	← misuto left	23:08
	← Xeago left	23:09
	← qgTG left	23:09
	→ fxrs_ joined	23:09
	Xeago_ → Xeago	23:09
	← wodim left	23:09
	→ mowcat joined	23:09
	→ Kremator joined	23:09
	→ qgTG joined	23:09
	→ Milos_ joined	23:09
	← feriman left	23:09
	→ wodim joined	23:09
	→ misuto joined	23:09
	→ nivag joined	23:09
	← Milos left	23:09
	← Fernando-Basso left	23:10
	← reprazent left	23:10
	← ZachGibbens left	23:10
	← prg318 left	23:10
	→ ZachGibbens joined	23:10
	← shored left	23:10
	← kimiamania left	23:10
	← grandfso left	23:10
	← IAmNetx left	23:10
	→ shored joined	23:10
	← m1sdirection left	23:10
	→ kimiamania joined	23:10
	→ Cerise joined	23:10
	← anddam left	23:11
	← Mindi left	23:11
	→ m1sdirection joined	23:11
	← utrack left	23:11
	← hk239 left	23:11
	→ lucasseikioshiro joined	23:11
	→ oxguy3 joined	23:11
	← fstd left	23:12
	fstd_ → fstd	23:12
	→ prg318 joined	23:12
	→ Improvotter joined	23:12
	← Codaraxis left	23:12
	← caskd left	23:13
	→ caskd joined	23:14
robinb	set irc.look.smart_filter on	23:15
	yes	23:15
	→ akemhp joined	23:16
	→ Codaraxis joined	23:18
	← bvdw left	23:18
	← Codaraxis left	23:18
	→ bvdw joined	23:19
	← to1ne left	23:19
	→ buckworst joined	23:19
	← caskd left	23:20
	→ utrack joined	23:20
	→ howdoi joined	23:20
	← ed_peguillan left	23:21
	→ bongjovi joined	23:21
	→ Codaraxis joined	23:22
	→ im0nde_ joined	23:22
	→ jlosito joined	23:24
	← im0nde left	23:24
	→ to1ne joined	23:25
	← CodeSlingerPaul left	23:26
	← buckworst left	23:26
	← jlosito left	23:29
	← bongjovi left	23:30
	→ malmalmal joined	23:30
	→ bongjovi joined	23:30
	← submerciful left	23:39
	← to1ne left	23:43
	← fxrs_ left	23:44
	← Improvotter left	23:44
	→ caskd joined	23:45
	← vrih left	23:45
	→ alonkli joined	23:46
	→ alonkli12 joined	23:46
	→ fxrs joined	23:46
	→ vrih joined	23:48
	→ RoriconKnight joined	23:50
	← akemhp left	23:51
	← sperry left	23:58

Logs Search ←Prev date Next date→

Channels Documentation