IRCloggy #git 2020-03-26

Provider of IRC logs since 2005.

WARNING: As Freenode became unjoinable and lost all warnings in topics, we cannot log channels on Freenode anymore.

	2020-03-26
	→ tiin57 joined	00:03
	← xelxebar left	00:04
	→ haasn` joined	00:04
	→ Dirak joined	00:05
	→ zanetti joined	00:05
	→ mat001 joined	00:07
	← xco left	00:09
	→ xelxebar joined	00:09
	← haasn` left	00:10
	→ PyDon joined	00:12
PyDon	hi	00:12
	← mat001 left	00:13
	← dartmouthed left	00:15
nedbat	PyDon: hey there	00:15
PyDon	hey nedbat, you are also everywhere :-D	00:15
	← omnireq left	00:18
	→ omnireq joined	00:18
PyDon	can anyone help me? Given the following example: https://nopaste.linux-dev.org/?1295383	00:20
	Why does $ git add link/file	00:20
	fail with: fatal: pathspec 'link/orig' is beyond a symbolic link	00:20
	but $ git add .	00:20
	is fine?	00:20
	→ omnireq_ joined	00:21
	→ haasn` joined	00:21
	→ Wetmelon joined	00:22
	← dedowsdi left	00:23
	← Dirak left	00:23
	← omnireq left	00:23
	→ buckworst joined	00:26
	← tiin57 left	00:29
	← vdamewood left	00:32
str	rafasc, OK, if I git-filter-repo --path=myPath it will delete everything BUT myPath, which is OK, BUT, I want myPath to be the root folder of the repo	00:32
	What am I missing?	00:33
	→ tiin57 joined	00:33
rafasc	str: you are missing the subdirectory filter: https://github.com/newren/git-filter-repo#solving-this-with-filter-repo	00:34
	→ roadie joined	00:36
str	rafasc, AWESOME!	00:37
	rafasc, now, if I review the log in gitk, I see some blue-ish labels "replace/$hash" like here in this screenshot: https://i.imgur.com/2YiYUxJ.png	00:38
	What are those?	00:38
rafasc	man git replace	00:39
gitinfo	the git-replace manpage is available at https://gitirc.eu/git-replace.html	00:39
rafasc	git has a mechanism for object replacement, that's probably a map that link each commit to their source commit.	00:39
	← PyDon left	00:40
	← roadie left	00:41
	→ PyDon joined	00:42
str	... it's like a log	00:42
	BUT I can get rid of them, right?	00:42
	Or I can even create the new repo without them, right?	00:42
	→ mat001 joined	00:43
rafasc	see --replace-refs	00:46
str	rafasc, MAN! YOU ARE THE BEST!	00:48
	← mat001 left	00:48
str	Thank you a lot	00:48
	→ libertyprime joined	00:50
	→ jstimm joined	00:52
	→ dedowsdi joined	00:52
	← cdown left	00:54
	→ cdown joined	00:55
	← mescalinum left	00:56
	← str left	00:57
	← Brainium left	00:59
	← tiin57 left	00:59
	← omnireq_ left	01:00
	← _Warl0ck left	01:00
	→ mescalinum joined	01:00
	← dumb_moth left	01:00
	zanetti → Zanetti	01:01
	→ omnireq_ joined	01:01
	→ _Warl0ck joined	01:01
	Zanetti → zanetti	01:02
	→ tiin57 joined	01:03
	→ dumb_moth joined	01:03
	← zanetti left	01:03
	← zlogan left	01:04
	→ zanetti joined	01:05
	← cbreak left	01:07
	← jstimm left	01:07
	→ cbreak joined	01:08
	← NODE left	01:08
	→ NODE joined	01:10
	→ zlogan joined	01:12
	→ oriba joined	01:18
	← bitnoize left	01:19
	← cliluw left	01:24
	← is_null left	01:27
	← m0viefreak left	01:27
	← tiin57 left	01:30
	→ stenno joined	01:30
	→ roadie joined	01:30
	← ferdna left	01:32
	→ tiin57 joined	01:33
	← roadie left	01:35
	→ split_horizon joined	01:38
	→ tmz joined	01:39
	→ anderson joined	01:41
	→ bttf joined	01:41
	→ AppleGaming joined	01:41
	→ is_null joined	01:43
	→ Giant81 joined	01:49
	← foul_owl left	01:50
	→ foul_owl joined	01:52
	← PyDon left	01:56
	← g4570n left	01:58
	← rafasc left	01:59
	← tiin57 left	01:59
	← tafa2 left	02:00
	→ twb joined	02:02
twb	"git clone https://bitbucket.org/cowan/r7rs-wg1-infra/" ==> "remote: Mercurial (hg) is required to use this repository."	02:03
	Is it saying I can still use git, I just need some kind of hg thing like git-svn?	02:03
	Or is it saying "you have to use hg directly"	02:03
	→ tiin57 joined	02:03
	← stenno left	02:03
twb	There's a "mercurial-git" package to let hg talk to git servers, but I can't see a tool to let git talk to hg servers.	02:04
	Ah, git-remote-hg	02:05
	← kupi left	02:06
	← zanetti left	02:10
	→ zanetti joined	02:10
	← F0rTex left	02:10
	← Es0teric left	02:11
	→ F0rTex joined	02:11
	→ cpplearner joined	02:16
	← smichel17 left	02:27
	← tiin57 left	02:30
	← Sasazuka left	02:31
	→ tiin57 joined	02:33
	← oriba left	02:37
	← navidr left	02:50
	← is_null left	02:56
	← tiin57 left	02:59
	← Narrat left	03:00
	→ is_null joined	03:02
	→ tiin57 joined	03:03
	← thiago left	03:09
	→ caterfxo joined	03:09
	← lagothrix left	03:09
	→ lagothrix joined	03:09
	→ Es0teric joined	03:11
	← caterfxo left	03:18
	→ Beam_Inn joined	03:23
	← bvdw left	03:25
	→ bvdw joined	03:26
	← Beam_Inn left	03:28
	← EdFletcher left	03:29
	← tiin57 left	03:30
	→ EdFletcher joined	03:30
	→ FH_thecat joined	03:31
	← libertyprime left	03:32
	→ tiin57 joined	03:33
	→ rzanetti joined	03:34
	← zanetti left	03:34
	→ Goplat joined	03:37
	← inkbottle left	03:39
	← Es0teric left	03:42
	→ libertyprime joined	03:44
	→ zebrag joined	03:44
	→ Es0teric joined	03:45
	← omnireq_ left	03:46
	→ omnireq_ joined	03:49
	← Cabanossi left	03:50
	→ waveclaw joined	03:54
	→ yitz joined	03:56
	→ Cabanossi joined	03:57
	← tiin57 left	03:59
	→ tiin57 joined	04:03
	← AppleGaming left	04:04
	← libertyprime left	04:04
	← ojdo left	04:06
	→ libertyprime joined	04:06
	← _0xDEADBEEF left	04:08
	→ _0xDEADBEEF joined	04:08
	← FH_thecat left	04:13
	→ ojdo joined	04:13
	← Khisanth left	04:15
	← Wetmelon left	04:18
	← omnireq_ left	04:19
	← vicfred left	04:20
	→ omnireq joined	04:23
	→ Khisanth joined	04:29
	← tiin57 left	04:30
	→ tiin57 joined	04:32
	← rzanetti left	04:33
	← duderonomy left	04:33
	← maxwilliamson left	04:40
	→ caterfxo joined	04:40
	→ maxwilliamson joined	04:40
	→ cruxeternus joined	04:43
	← dedowsdi left	04:44
	→ nickodd joined	04:49
	← wildlander_ left	04:51
	→ vicfred joined	04:53
	→ Industrial joined	04:59
	← tiin57 left	04:59
	→ Phylock joined	05:00
	→ pks_ joined	05:02
	→ dedowsdi joined	05:03
	→ tiin57 joined	05:03
	← pks left	05:03
	pks_ → pks	05:03
	← clime left	05:06
	← caterfxo left	05:08
	← buckworst left	05:10
	→ xco joined	05:13
	→ caterfxo joined	05:22
	← dmc left	05:22
	→ DarthRadar joined	05:23
	← caterfxo left	05:23
	→ caterfxo joined	05:24
	← tiin57 left	05:29
	→ tiin57 joined	05:33
	→ sauvin joined	05:35
	← omnireq left	05:38
	→ omnireq joined	05:38
	→ g00s joined	05:40
	← Technodrome left	05:42
	← vicfred left	05:48
	← diverger left	05:51
	← causasui left	05:54
	→ diverger joined	05:55
	→ gschanuel joined	05:58
	← sidetrack left	05:58
	← tiin57 left	06:00
	→ tiin57 joined	06:03
	→ settermjd joined	06:05
	← Betal left	06:09
	→ Wetmelon joined	06:11
	→ markopasha joined	06:13
	← Industrial left	06:15
	→ nabil_ joined	06:16
	← nabil_ left	06:16
	→ nabil_ joined	06:17
	← Wetmelon left	06:17
	← nabil left	06:18
markopasha	So I've got two files in the project which I edit everytime after pull. I edit them due to my computer settings then I create a different branch and work on it. These file can get updated so I cant completely ignore them. What is the better way to deal with this	06:20
	← warthog9 left	06:21
	→ YuGiOhJCJ joined	06:22
twb	markopasha: split it into two files, one ignored, one edited?	06:24
	← gschanuel left	06:24
	← xco left	06:25
	→ gschanuel joined	06:26
markopasha	Would my changes be shown in history? Because one has couple of credentantials twb	06:28
twb	it sounds like you have file like ./config.php	06:29
	and it contains myhostname = "supercoolserver.com" and database_password = "swordfish"	06:29
	← kjartan left	06:29
	← tiin57 left	06:29
twb	So like split that into config.php with the default settings (version controlled), and config.local.php (not version controlled)	06:30
	→ kjartan joined	06:30
osse	markopasha: !config	06:30
gitinfo	markopasha: [!configfiles] It is recommended to store local configuration data in a file which is not tracked by git, but certain deployment scenarios(such as Heroku) may require otherwise. See https://gist.github.com/1423106 for some ideas	06:30
	→ warthog9 joined	06:31
markopasha	yea i have Gemfile and config/database.yml	06:31
	twb, osse gitinfo thank you	06:32
gitinfo	markopasha: you're welcome, but please note that I'm a bot. I'm not programmed to care.	06:32
markopasha	hahah:D	06:33
twb	Also if your database and app run on the same server, use socket auth and not f*cking passwords	06:33
	→ tiin57 joined	06:33
twb	passwords are the worst	06:33
markopasha	it is as environmental variables	06:34
	is that bad too	06:35
twb	that's just changing how you read the password	06:35
	but you're still using password-based authentication	06:35
markopasha	twb, yea true.	06:36
twb	With socket auth, the database just goes "hey kernel, what unix user connected to me? Oh, it was avahi-daemon? OK, then I'll use my GRANT rules for avahi-daemon"	06:36
	→ karab44 joined	06:36
	← Goplat left	06:37
	→ _leb joined	06:39
	→ pandakekok9 joined	06:39
	← cbreak left	06:40
	→ cbreak joined	06:41
	→ Forlorn_ joined	06:42
	← warthog9 left	06:43
	→ warthog9 joined	06:44
	→ xco joined	06:46
markopasha	:D i see	06:50
	← _leb left	06:50
	→ leb joined	06:52
	← leb left	06:52
	← omnireq left	06:53
	→ omnireq joined	06:54
	← foul_owl left	06:55
	→ mat001 joined	06:59
	← tiin57 left	06:59
	← mat001 left	06:59
	→ mat001 joined	07:00
	→ tiin57 joined	07:02
	→ dmc joined	07:04
	← dmc left	07:04
	→ foul_owl joined	07:09
	← ephemera_ left	07:17
	← NightStrike left	07:19
	← Phylock left	07:22
	← g00s left	07:22
	→ ephemera_ joined	07:23
	→ Noti joined	07:25
	→ noodle joined	07:26
	← tiin57 left	07:29
	→ stitched_unicorn joined	07:32
	→ tiin57 joined	07:33
	→ funkatronixxx joined	07:37
	→ oxymoron93 joined	07:46
	→ Jackneill joined	07:47
	→ g00s joined	07:48
	→ loganlee joined	07:55
	→ feriman joined	07:55
	→ fstd_ joined	07:55
loganlee	https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Branching-Rebasing hello on figure 47 it says, "If you run a git log when your history looks like this, you’ll see two commits that have the same author, date, and message, which will be confusing. " which two commits are those?	07:55
	→ Industrial joined	07:56
	← mat001 left	07:56
loganlee	is it C4' and C6?	07:57
osse	I would guess C4 and C4'	07:57
	← fstd left	07:59
	fstd_ → fstd	07:59
osse	this was an overly complicated explanation in my opinion'	07:59
	← tiin57 left	07:59
osse	but i am fairly confident it's C4 and C4'	08:00
	→ dviola joined	08:00
osse	because it is the guy who merged and pushed who is doing the rewriting so that C4 appears after C5 instead of parallel to it	08:01
	→ Naptra joined	08:01
	→ tiin57 joined	08:03
	← funkatronixxx left	08:04
	→ ilogger2 joined	08:06
	→ kent\n joined	08:06
	→ Nizumzen joined	08:06
	→ altendky joined	08:06
	→ mgsk joined	08:06
	→ Soni joined	08:06
	→ miklcct joined	08:06
	→ de-vri-es joined	08:06
	→ Tk55 joined	08:06
	→ T4cC0re joined	08:07
	→ ncdulo joined	08:07
	→ uebera\|\| joined	08:07
	→ dysfigured joined	08:07
	→ orgg joined	08:07
	→ kashike joined	08:07
	→ fructose joined	08:07
	→ nikivi joined	08:07
	→ hexnewbie joined	08:07
	→ NitrousPG joined	08:07
	→ FFY00 joined	08:07
	→ Habbie joined	08:07
	→ shabius joined	08:07
	→ TomyLobo joined	08:07
	→ POQDavid joined	08:08
	→ n-st joined	08:08
	→ iloop joined	08:08
	→ NODE joined	08:08
	→ Kamilion joined	08:08
	→ causasui joined	08:08
	→ Dirak joined	08:09
	→ net_wayfarer joined	08:09
loganlee	osse, i agree that it is C4 and C4'	08:09
	→ saidelike joined	08:10
	→ arooni joined	08:11
	→ dmc joined	08:15
	→ Celelibi joined	08:16
	→ HumanGeek joined	08:19
loganlee	when i was out of caffeine and i read a sentence it made no sense to me. then i just drank coffee mixed in cold milk, and now i read again and it makes sense now	08:22
cpplearner	I'm trying to rebase my forked 'develop' branch to the original 'devleop'	08:24
	branch, but thers' a conflict.	08:25
	So, I'm trying to add another branch, and pull updates there, and rebase mine to this branch.	08:25
	Does it sound good?	08:25
	Or, is there any better way?	08:25
osse	You will get conflicts either way	08:26
cpplearner	Oh, yeah. Sorry.	08:26
osse	unless you mean you want to rebase your branch on something other than develop	08:26
	say, master or stable or whatever	08:26
cpplearner	I want to first apply the original repo's updates, and rebase mine to this one, and fianlly make a PR.	08:28
	As you said, of course I should resolve the conflict.	08:28
	But, I'm not sure it's the desirable way.	08:28
	Maybe, another good solution?	08:28
osse	without knowing more specifics it's hard to say	08:29
	Why don't you think that's desirable?	08:29
cpplearner	Hmm, I might break something, so I want to be careful. ='(	08:30
osse	how can you break anything?	08:31
cpplearner	Uhh, I'm a total newbie, so I'm just saying. But, can I ask you one more quesiton?	08:33
	→ baako joined	08:33
cpplearner	Is it possible to pull som specific branch from the original repo to my local branch whose name is different from the former?	08:33
	→ tiin57 joined	08:33
	→ dedowsdi joined	08:34
	→ funkatronixxx joined	08:37
	→ wootehfoot joined	08:37
	← funkatronixxx left	08:39
osse	yes	08:39
	→ ryzokuken joined	08:40
	→ TomyWork joined	08:41
	→ mobidrop joined	08:43
osse	git pull origin branchname	08:43
cpplearner	osse: Thanks you! I got it working by git pull origin source-branch:destination-branch! =)	08:44
	→ chele joined	08:45
	→ clime joined	08:46
	→ Borkr joined	08:50
	→ makaveli7 joined	08:51
	← TomyLobo left	08:54
	→ shored joined	08:57
	← tiin57 left	09:00
	→ tiin57 joined	09:03
	← nikivi left	09:14
	→ nikivi joined	09:14
	→ sgn joined	09:18
	→ funkatronixxx joined	09:24
	→ bvdw joined	09:25
	→ fitzgerald1337 joined	09:29
	← tiin57 left	09:29
	← funkatronixxx left	09:31
	→ tiin57 joined	09:33
	→ bitnoize joined	09:38
	→ bdeshi joined	09:42
	→ funkatronixxx joined	09:45
	← funkatronixxx left	09:46
	→ maczor joined	09:48
maczor	Hi I've run into an issue when checking out a branch that contains a submodule with update=none while submodule.recurse is set to true that I was hoping to get some opinions on.	09:51
	When I do this I get a fatal error as git detects that there is no submodule repository present (due to the update=none) however because of the recurse=true it tries to checkout the referenced commit in this submodule.	09:52
	With GIT_TRACE=1 I get this output:	09:53
	19:20:18.129343 run-command.c:663 trace: run_command: cd	09:53
	no-update-submodule; unset GIT_PREFIX; GIT_DIR=.git git	09:53
	--super-prefix= no-update-submodule/ read-tree -u --reset	09:53
	4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904	09:53
	fatal: not a git repository: ../.git/modules/no-update-submodule	09:53
	fatal: could not reset submodule index	09:53
	It's possible to workaround this issue by deiniting the submodules before checking out the branch. However this is non-ideal	09:55
	→ dartmouthed joined	09:55
maczor	However this seems like a bug?	09:56
	→ Phylock joined	09:57
	→ scarcry joined	09:59
	← tiin57 left	09:59
	→ tiin57 joined	10:03
	← clime left	10:03
	→ clime joined	10:03
	→ funkatronixxx joined	10:03
	← funkatronixxx left	10:07
	→ funkatronixxx joined	10:11
	→ fassl joined	10:11
	→ libertyprime joined	10:17
	← funkatronixxx left	10:18
	← causasui left	10:19
	→ giorgian joined	10:22
	← Dirak left	10:23
	→ albel727 joined	10:23
	→ raven-au_ joined	10:28
osse	maczor: if there's a submodule don't you need to run submodule init regardless of whether update=none or not?	10:28
	← tiin57 left	10:29
maczor	osse: the full reproduction steps are:	10:31
	The reproduction steps are to:	10:31
	- Clone the repo	10:31
	- Checkout a branch containing submodules that are set with	10:31
	update=none (git checkout branch-name)	10:31
	- Update and init submodules (git submodule update --init)	10:31
	- Attempt to switch to a different branch (git checkout other-branch)	10:31
	Uploaded file: https://uploads.kiwiirc.com/files/1ef06a0d080695398ece32fdd5837ed3/pasted.txt	10:31
	If I do this when submodule.recurse is set to true, git tries to switch to a specific commit for that submodule despite it not being there and throws the fatal error.	10:33
giorgian	Hi. If I do `git stash -u` where there are only untracked files, git stash show gives no output, even with -v. Is this a bug?	10:33
	→ tiin57 joined	10:33
osse	maczor: and this only happens if update=none?	10:34
	sounds like it should happen always	10:34
maczor	osse: it only happens when update=none and submodules.recurse=true. There are no issues for submodules without update=none. I also tried without submodules.recurse=false and I don't see the fatal error	10:35
osse	I don't know enough about submodule config to be sure, but it sounds like a bug	10:36
	→ antoine joined	10:38
	← POQDavid left	10:46
	→ POQDavid joined	10:47
	→ DelPhyinf joined	10:47
	← makaveli7 left	10:48
	→ ghost43 joined	10:48
	→ makaveli7 joined	10:53
	← Habbie left	10:53
	→ Habbie joined	10:55
	→ PacKetSlayer joined	10:56
	← NODE left	10:56
	← fitzgerald1337 left	10:58
maczor	Thanks osse. Me too.	10:59
	→ NODE joined	10:59
	← tiin57 left	10:59
	→ staafl_r19 joined	11:02
	→ tiin57 joined	11:03
	← ghost43 left	11:04
	→ Brainium joined	11:04
	← baako left	11:04
	→ Hello71 joined	11:05
	→ opal joined	11:06
	→ andreas31 joined	11:07
	→ chiastre joined	11:07
	→ xelxebar joined	11:07
	→ gxt joined	11:08
	→ tryte joined	11:10
	← maczor left	11:10
	← POQDavid left	11:17
	→ POQDavid joined	11:17
	→ iNs joined	11:20
	→ ghost43 joined	11:20
	→ justanotheruser joined	11:23
	← nikivi left	11:23
	→ nikivi joined	11:23
	← ghost43 left	11:25
	← bitnoize left	11:26
	→ ghost43 joined	11:26
	→ bitnoize joined	11:27
	← giorgian left	11:28
	← tiin57 left	11:29
	→ funkatronixxx joined	11:31
	→ thiago joined	11:32
	→ tiin57 joined	11:33
	→ def_jam joined	11:35
	→ eblip joined	11:35
	← funkatronixxx left	11:36
	→ stenno joined	11:38
	→ mescalinum joined	11:38
	← dedowsdi left	11:38
	→ rosco_y joined	11:40
	→ dedowsdi joined	11:41
rosco_y	I'm currently in my master, and have made a number of changes and realize that the changes would have fit nicely in a new branch. Is it safe for me to create a new branch at this time, and check my changes into the new branch?	11:41
pandem	yes	11:42
	← libertyprime left	11:42
jast	I do that all the time	11:42
rosco_y	thank you pandem :)	11:42
jast	though I often forget to create and switch to the new branch before committing, so then I have the extra step of cleaning up master	11:43
	← chiastre left	11:44
	→ chiastre joined	11:44
	→ _0xDEADBEEF joined	11:45
	← wootehfoot left	11:45
	← iNs left	11:45
	→ Kaivo joined	11:45
	→ iNs joined	11:46
scorphus	@rosco_y and @jast, I have a handy git command for exactly that: https://github.com/scorphus/scorphiles/blob/master/bin/rtomayko/git-cut-branch	11:49
jast	cool... I think it can be simplified a lot, though :)	11:50
	→ nabil__ joined	11:51
jast	the bare essentials of it is this: git branch <new name>; git reset --hard '@{u}'; git checkout <new name>	11:51
	(as always, --hard is a potentially destructive operation, so don't use this unless you know what you're doing :))	11:52
	→ hyperair joined	11:52
	← nikivi left	11:56
	→ nikivi joined	11:56
jast	a safer alternative that avoids destroying uncommitted changes: old=$(git symbolic-ref --short HEAD); git checkout -b $new; git push -f . $old@{u}:$old	11:57
	add some error handling and sanity checks and you end up with a ~15 line script	11:57
	→ Technodrome joined	11:58
	→ buckworst joined	11:59
	← tiin57 left	11:59
jast	for a friendlier reflog entry on the source branch: old="$(git symbolic-ref HEAD)"; git checkout -b "$new"; git update-ref -m "cut branch $new" "$old" "${old#refs/heads/}@{u}"	12:01
	← ghost43 left	12:02
	→ tiin57 joined	12:03
	→ ghost43 joined	12:03
	← dedowsdi left	12:03
	← POQDavid left	12:04
	→ POQDavid joined	12:04
	→ aw1 joined	12:05
jast	some more hints:	12:05
	to unambiguously abbreviate an object ID: git rev-parse --abrev-ref <sha1>	12:06
	→ CodeSlingerPaul joined	12:06
jast	to strip the refs prefix from a shell variable: current="${ref#refs/heads/}" (avoids an echo/sed pipe)	12:07
	← thiago left	12:09
	→ Lucas_Gray joined	12:09
	← mescalinum left	12:09
	→ mowcat joined	12:11
jast	to look up a branch's upstream: git for-each-ref --format='%(upstream)' refs/heads/foo	12:11
	→ mescalinum joined	12:12
jast	that's all I can think of for now	12:12
	→ ChrisLane joined	12:14
	→ thiago joined	12:21
	← ghost43 left	12:22
	← nikivi left	12:22
	→ ghost43 joined	12:22
	→ nikivi joined	12:22
	→ snakeice joined	12:22
	← NODE left	12:23
	← ChrisLane left	12:24
	→ NODE joined	12:25
	→ ChrisLane joined	12:25
	← Lucas_Gray left	12:26
	← NODE left	12:26
	→ NODE joined	12:28
	→ Maxattax joined	12:29
	→ graingert joined	12:29
	← tiin57 left	12:29
	← NODE left	12:29
graingert	how does $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/ignore work on windows? https://git-scm.com/docs/gitignore	12:30
	→ NODE joined	12:31
jast	from the manpage: If $XDG_CONFIG_HOME is either not set or empty, $HOME/.config/git/ignore is used instead.	12:32
	→ tiin57 joined	12:32
graingert	jast: does windows have $HOME?	12:33
osse	graingert: echo $HOME in Git Bash	12:34
	→ Betal joined	12:34
	← buckworst left	12:34
jast	seems to use Windows's $USERPROFILE	12:34
graingert	you mean %USERPROFILE%	12:35
jast	that's just syntax differences depending on which shell you use	12:35
graingert	so if I put ignore lines in here they will be ignored globally? %USERPROFILE%\.config\git\ignore	12:36
jast	well, it seems likely :)	12:36
	→ AppleGaming joined	12:37
osse	ttps://github.com/git/git/blob/2f268890c2cd2f115424936bbee27f8269080e5e/compat/mingw.c#L2524-L2546	12:39
	goddammit	12:39
	https://github.com/git/git/blob/2f268890c2cd2f115424936bbee27f8269080e5e/compat/mingw.c#L2524-L2546	12:39
	I wonder why this code is in git itself and not the git-for-windows repo	12:39
jast	hysterical raisins I bet :)	12:42
_ikke_	yum	12:43
jast	Welcome to #git, home of the best breakfast foods	12:46
	→ Lucas_Gray joined	12:46
	← _0xDEADBEEF left	12:48
	← andreas31 left	12:50
	→ libertyprime joined	12:52
	→ andreas31 joined	12:53
	→ blowry joined	12:54
	→ jayr joined	12:57
	→ maxwilliamson joined	12:57
	← tiin57 left	12:59
	→ mauz555 joined	13:01
	← mauz555 left	13:01
	→ mauz555 joined	13:02
	→ tiin57 joined	13:03
	→ crose joined	13:04
	→ wootehfoot joined	13:05
	← mescalinum left	13:08
	→ mescalinum joined	13:08
	← mauz555 left	13:09
	→ mauz555 joined	13:10
	→ cdown_ joined	13:10
	→ cyberpear joined	13:12
	cdown_ → cdown	13:13
	→ silverwhitefish joined	13:14
	← POQDavid left	13:25
	→ POQDavid joined	13:25
	→ irrgit joined	13:26
	← gxt left	13:26
	→ gxt joined	13:27
	← tiin57 left	13:30
	← POQDavid left	13:31
	→ POQDavid joined	13:32
	→ mat001 joined	13:32
	→ oriba joined	13:32
	→ tiin57 joined	13:33
	← POQDavid left	13:40
	→ POQDavid joined	13:41
	→ lucasb joined	13:42
	→ _0xDEADBEEF joined	13:43
	→ duderonomy joined	13:44
	← libertyprime left	13:46
	→ g4570n joined	13:47
	← nikivi left	13:49
	→ nikivi joined	13:49
	← bvdw left	13:50
	→ bvdw joined	13:51
	→ Fernando-Basso[m joined	13:53
Fernando-Basso[m	In an Ubuntu system, ‘git diff -R’ display whitespace changes. On another computer running Arch Linux, ‘git diff -W’ (not ‘-R’) displays whitespace changes. Reading the help, I couldn't see any thing that would hint that either ‘-R’ or ‘-W’ would display whitespace changes.	13:53
_ikke_	diff -R is reverse diff	13:55
Fernando-Basso[m	-R: Swap two inputs; that is, show differences from index or on-disk file to tree contents.	13:55
	-W, --function-context: Show whole surrounding functions of changes.	13:55
	From git diff --help	13:55
	“Show whole surrounding functions of changes.” <-- what does that mean?	13:56
	→ Wetmelon joined	13:56
	← thiago left	13:56
_ikke_	It means that it tries to show the complete function, not just 3 lines before and after	13:56
Fernando-Basso[m	yeah, but what does it have to do with visually displaying whitespace changes? What does “function” mean here?	13:57
	← mowcat left	13:57
_ikke_	it should not	13:57
	(have an influence)	13:58
	→ pupsikov joined	13:59
	← tiin57 left	13:59
	→ tiin57 joined	14:03
	→ thiago joined	14:04
	← POQDavid left	14:11
	→ POQDavid joined	14:12
	← Lucas_Gray left	14:13
	→ scde joined	14:17
	→ Guy1524 joined	14:18
	← chele left	14:21
	→ nickodd joined	14:24
	→ nabil_ joined	14:27
	→ akem_ joined	14:27
	→ katie_- joined	14:29
	→ chele joined	14:29
	→ Aaeriele joined	14:29
	← tiin57 left	14:29
	→ mooasaurus joined	14:29
	→ diverger joined	14:30
	← nabil__ left	14:30
	← Guy1524 left	14:30
	→ doug16k joined	14:30
	→ cjohnson joined	14:30
	→ berndj joined	14:30
	→ luis joined	14:31
	→ th_ joined	14:31
	→ timewalker joined	14:31
	→ jetchisel joined	14:31
	→ sjohnson joined	14:32
	← mat001 left	14:32
	→ mat001_ joined	14:32
	→ sbeyer joined	14:32
	→ fitzgerald1337 joined	14:33
	→ tiin57 joined	14:33
	→ fahadash joined	14:33
	→ Dougie187 joined	14:33
	→ ExeciN joined	14:34
	← _0xDEADBEEF left	14:37
	→ cfoch joined	14:39
	→ ojdo joined	14:40
jayr	Fernando-Basso[m: are the git-configs different on the two systems?	14:40
	→ rustyshackleford joined	14:40
	→ Kobaz joined	14:43
Kobaz	is there a way to have fully automatic remote tracking branches, like subversion nested repos sort of thing	14:43
	ie: when you git clone, the whole thing comes down	14:43
osse	when you clone the whole thing does come down	14:44
	all the things you see when you run git branch -r are in fact local	14:44
	however, updating them aftewards isn't automatic. git fetch does that.	14:45
Kobaz	it's not a branch in the same repo, it's another repo	14:45
	like nested repos	14:45
	that's what i meant actually	14:45
	i kind of set it up a while ago but i don't think it's quite right	14:46
	it involved a lot of messy merging	14:46
	ah submodules	14:46
	→ rhinojunior joined	14:46
	→ ribasushi joined	14:46
Kobaz	and subtree merging	14:47
	so here's the situation... i want to split code from updates... so we have an update/deploy system that tracks changes pushed to each customer, and i don't think that belongs in the main repo	14:48
	so someone could choose to check out only the code, and not the built-updates based on the code	14:48
	because i have 500 megs of deployment files right now and there's only a few dozen releases tracked right now	14:49
	← jayr left	14:50
Kobaz	oooooh, i have a better idea... put the deployment on nfs and don't git that. Everyone would use the same deployment mount so we keep versioning in sync	14:50
	deployment is heavily human-coordinated so there's no locking issues or that sort of thing	14:51
	osse: thanks, you're a genius!	14:51
	← makaveli7 left	14:52
	← nikivi left	14:52
	→ nikivi joined	14:52
	→ sidetrack joined	14:55
osse	i find that hard to believe	14:55
	← NODE left	14:56
	→ libertyprime joined	14:58
	→ NODE joined	14:58
	← tiin57 left	14:59
	← sidetrack left	14:59
	→ tiin57 joined	15:03
	← thiago left	15:04
	→ thiago joined	15:04
	→ dhollinger joined	15:07
	← mat001_ left	15:09
	→ yonder joined	15:09
	→ xcm joined	15:10
	→ mat001 joined	15:11
	← nikivi left	15:11
	→ nikivi joined	15:12
	→ R2robot joined	15:17
	← libertyprime left	15:20
	→ paul424 joined	15:20
	→ roadie joined	15:22
	→ libertyprime joined	15:26
	← scde left	15:26
	→ makaveli7 joined	15:27
	→ mowcat joined	15:27
	← tiin57 left	15:29
	← POQDavid left	15:32
	→ POQDavid joined	15:33
	→ tiin57 joined	15:33
	→ vdl joined	15:35
	→ nuala joined	15:36
	→ causasui joined	15:38
Kobaz	osse: hah, i solve half my problems just talking through them to my dog	15:39
	← justanotheruser left	15:39
osse	dog, eh	15:40
Kobaz	he helps me code	15:40
osse	i guess it's like a rubber dock, except it's got four legs, no wings, and is made of flesh	15:40
	*duck	15:40
	← POQDavid left	15:44
	→ POQDavid joined	15:44
	← hexnewbie left	15:46
	→ hexnewbie joined	15:46
	← nikivi left	15:49
	→ nikivi joined	15:49
	← mowcat left	15:50
parsnip	was the solution a frisbee?	15:54
	← mescalinum left	15:55
	→ justanotheruser joined	15:55
	← ghost43 left	15:55
	← thiago left	15:55
	→ ghost43 joined	15:55
	→ thiago joined	15:56
Kobaz	yes	15:57
	→ NightStrike joined	15:57
	← xcm left	15:59
	← tiin57 left	15:59
	→ xcm joined	16:00
	→ tiin57 joined	16:03
	← mobidrop left	16:07
	→ syr joined	16:10
	← opal left	16:12
	← nuala left	16:12
	← ghost43 left	16:15
	→ ghost43 joined	16:16
	← HumanGeek left	16:19
	→ HumanGeek joined	16:20
	← chele left	16:28
	← tiin57 left	16:29
	→ feriman joined	16:32
	→ tiin57 joined	16:33
	→ multiproc joined	16:36
	→ tonyj joined	16:37
	← thiago left	16:38
	→ eb0t joined	16:40
	← eblip left	16:40
	→ eb0t_ joined	16:41
	← def_jam left	16:41
	→ cek joined	16:46
	→ thiago joined	16:49
	→ troulouliou_div2 joined	16:54
	→ faceface_ joined	16:59
	← tiin57 left	16:59
faceface_	this may be dumb, but my server is running on git controlled files, I want to ff a different branch, and then rebase my current branch on top of that	17:00
	git branch # REL1_33 / * REL1_33-gero	17:00
	← troulouliou_div2 left	17:01
faceface_	I want to ff REL1_33 because it's behind origin, then rebase REL1_33-gero on REL1_33 without switching to REL1_33... impossible?	17:01
	→ tiin57 joined	17:03
	→ axisys joined	17:08
	← cdown left	17:08
	→ g00s joined	17:09
	← andreas31 left	17:10
	→ caterfxo joined	17:11
	→ mingdao joined	17:14
	→ troulouliou_div2 joined	17:14
	→ andreas31 joined	17:15
	→ pinkisntwell joined	17:16
pinkisntwell	Sometimes when doing merges on yaml files I get conflicts even though what happened is someone added a bunch of lines, I added another bunch of lines but those two sets of lines have common subsets. Git thinks that those common subsets means they are somehow related, even though they are not.	17:17
	How do I get git to just put one bunch above the other and move on?	17:17
	→ tango_ joined	17:19
	← libertyprime left	17:21
	→ karoshi joined	17:23
	→ karab44 joined	17:23
	→ scde joined	17:25
	← karab44 left	17:25
	→ rafasc joined	17:27
	← tiin57 left	17:29
	→ tiin57 joined	17:33
	← thiago left	17:34
	→ thiago joined	17:35
celphi	How do i remove all unmerged files	17:36
	← oriba left	17:42
	→ fflam joined	17:42
	← nikivi left	17:45
	→ nikivi joined	17:45
	→ omnireq joined	17:48
	← thiago left	17:48
	→ thiago joined	17:49
Fernando-Basso[m	jayr: Besides different git versions on ubuntu and arch linux, nothing else was explicitly changed than the defaults, which I can't check right now.	17:50
	← mauz555 left	17:51
	← nikivi left	17:58
	→ nikivi joined	17:59
	← tiin57 left	17:59
	→ Jackneill joined	18:01
	← nikivi left	18:02
	→ tiin57 joined	18:02
	→ nikivi joined	18:02
	→ mescalinum joined	18:03
	→ meejah joined	18:04
	← nickodd left	18:07
	← nikivi left	18:08
	→ nikivi joined	18:08
	→ Giant81 joined	18:08
	→ diogenese joined	18:09
	← TomyWork left	18:09
	← omnireq left	18:10
	→ omnireq_ joined	18:10
	→ funkatronixxx joined	18:10
	→ xco joined	18:11
	← troulouliou_div2 left	18:11
meejah	celphi: what was your git question from #python?	18:12
	← tango_ left	18:14
	→ tango_ joined	18:15
	→ vicfred joined	18:16
	→ Jck_true joined	18:16
	← multiproc left	18:17
	← nikivi left	18:23
	→ nikivi joined	18:24
	→ m0viefreak joined	18:24
	← scde left	18:27
	← tiin57 left	18:29
	← omnireq_ left	18:31
	→ omnireq_ joined	18:31
	→ tiin57 joined	18:33
	→ shush joined	18:42
shush	Hello, so I fucked up on something. I created a copy of a remote branch locally, merged (with fast-forward), then pushed.	18:43
	I need to to undo that	18:43
	→ jfindlay joined	18:43
jfindlay	another developer has a branch with a submodule update, but that submodule update is not part of any commit on that branch. It seems to be treated in a floating unstaged state attached to the branch head. He pushed the branch to the remote and I fetched it from the remote and see the same behavior	18:46
	← silverwhitefish left	18:46
jfindlay	checking out the branch results in an unstaged change to the submodule hash	18:46
	if I `git submodule update --init`, the submodule update is gone, but git thinks there is no difference between the local and remote copies of the branch	18:47
	→ silverwhitefish joined	18:47
	→ cliluw joined	18:49
	← cliluw left	18:49
	→ cliluw joined	18:49
EdFletcher	shush: you can do that with `reset`, but since you've pushed already you must force-push the `reset`ed remote branch now	18:51
shush	How do I know which commit the previous one is?	18:51
	← omnireq_ left	18:52
	→ omnireq_ joined	18:52
	← mescalinum left	18:52
osse	git reflog branchname	18:53
	or git reflog origin/branchname since that's the thing you need to push --forcev	18:53
	← paul424 left	18:55
jfindlay	so the question is, where is the submodule update being stored if not in a commit?	18:55
osse	jfindlay: nowhere. it's stored in commits	18:56
jfindlay	it is not in any commit	18:56
	← cliluw left	18:56
osse	jfindlay: when you checkout a different branch submodules aren't automatically updated	18:56
jfindlay	it appears only as an unstaged change when you checkout the branch	18:56
osse	exactly	18:56
	because the submodule is still in its old state (before the checkout)	18:57
	→ paul424 joined	18:57
osse	so you need to run git submodule update after checkout	18:57
	→ cliluw joined	18:59
jfindlay	so the submodule is holding onto the state from the last time it was updated, and the only time there is a discrepancy is because you switch between branches with different submodule states?	18:59
	← tiin57 left	18:59
jfindlay	assuming you don't have some kind of hook to auto update submodules on branch change	18:59
osse	there can also be a discrepancy if you go in there and make changes yourself	18:59
jfindlay	right	18:59
osse	but yes, that's right	19:00
	there is the possibility of a post-checkout hook in which you can run 'git submodule update'	19:00
	i'm not sure why that's not just the default	19:00
jfindlay	so how do I update the remote branch? It is in pull request and shows the submodule hash change	19:01
osse	push, I guess?	19:01
	→ tiin57 joined	19:03
	← paul424 left	19:03
	← duderonomy left	19:04
jfindlay	if I checkout the branch locally and then `git submodule update ; git push origin the_branch`, I get `Everything up-to-date`	19:04
osse	then the remote branch is up to date	19:04
	→ mescalinum joined	19:04
osse	you have to clarify what you want	19:04
	→ duderonomy joined	19:05
	→ Dirak joined	19:12
jfindlay	so the branch is in pull request on the remote. The submodule change appears in the pull request for a different reason: the branch and the target branch have different submodule hashes	19:12
	thanks for the help	19:13
	→ aw1_ joined	19:13
osse	ne nada	19:13
	sounds like things are as they should be	19:14
jfindlay	yes	19:14
	→ Apple joined	19:14
	← aw1 left	19:14
	→ Narrat joined	19:15
	Apple → Guest38430	19:15
	← AppleGaming left	19:16
	→ Noti joined	19:19
	→ multiproc joined	19:20
	← funkatronixxx left	19:21
	→ xSke joined	19:25
	← aw1_ left	19:25
	← tiin57 left	19:29
	→ funkatronixxx joined	19:30
	→ Codaraxis joined	19:33
	→ tiin57 joined	19:33
	→ sidetrack joined	19:33
	→ qgTG joined	19:33
	→ g00s_ joined	19:36
	← g00s left	19:39
	← shush left	19:43
	→ manj-gnome joined	19:49
	← bvdw left	19:50
	→ bvdw joined	19:51
	→ smichel17 joined	19:52
	← fahadash left	19:53
	→ troulouliou_dev joined	19:54
	→ dre_ joined	19:55
	→ chandoo joined	19:57
	→ midnight joined	19:59
	← tiin57 left	19:59
	→ tiin57 joined	20:03
	← Borkr left	20:07
	← cliluw left	20:10
	→ cliluw joined	20:10
	→ cdown joined	20:11
	← multiproc left	20:12
	→ Sasazuka joined	20:13
	← cdown left	20:18
	→ shush joined	20:19
	← shush left	20:19
	→ shush joined	20:19
shush	osse: I did the reflog command, and I see something like this:...	20:20
	aebdff80c accolades-redesign-components@{1}: branch: Created from HEAD	20:21
	Is that hash (aebdff80c) the commit?	20:21
osse	yes	20:21
shush	So I just run `git reset --hard accolades-redesign-components@{1}` and that should move it back for me?	20:22
	Then I do push --force	20:22
	← caterfxo left	20:22
osse	eys	20:23
	← makaveli7 left	20:24
	→ scde joined	20:24
	← manj-gnome left	20:24
	→ mauz555 joined	20:25
	← jetchisel left	20:25
	← mescalinum left	20:25
	→ jetchisel joined	20:26
	← Maxattax left	20:28
	← silverwhitefish left	20:28
	← tiin57 left	20:29
	→ inkbottle joined	20:30
	→ tiin57 joined	20:33
	→ caterfxo joined	20:33
	→ Tawonga joined	20:37
	← Noti left	20:37
	→ jim joined	20:39
	→ silverwhitefish joined	20:40
	→ Ploppz joined	20:52
shush	What does @{1} mean?	20:53
	g00s_ → g00s	20:53
_ikke_	2nd reflog entry of HEAD	20:54
j416	shush: the knowledge you seek is buried somewhere deep at man gitrevisions	20:54
gitinfo	shush: the gitrevisions manpage is available at https://gitirc.eu/gitrevisions.html	20:54
j416	in fact not so deep.	20:55
	← scde left	20:56
j416	shush: to phrase it like the docs do, the nth prior value of HEAD, in this case 1 prior, so what HEAD was before what it is now	20:56
shush	So not _one commit_ behind, but rather _one ref log_ behind?	20:57
j416	yes	20:57
	→ tafa2 joined	20:58
	→ kleisli__ joined	20:59
j416	trying this out it looks very much like I'm wrong though.	20:59
	← tiin57 left	20:59
j416	@{1} means currentbranch@{1}, not HEAD@{1}.	21:00
	_ikke_: ^	21:00
	so, if you were on master, @{1} would be where master pointed to before what it points to now	21:01
	whereas if HEAD is detached (not on any branch), @{1} would I think mean HEAD@{1}.	21:01
	← caterfxo left	21:02
j416	shush: ^	21:02
osse	I'm 83% sure you're wrong	21:02
_ikke_	I'm 97.3% sure	21:02
j416	from the man page:	21:02
	> You can use the @ construct with an empty ref part to get at a reflog entry of the current branch. For example, if you are on branch blabla then @{1} means the same as blabla@{1}.	21:02
nedbat	shush: i interpreted shush's question as, "what does the suffix @{1} mean?"	21:02
	→ tiin57 joined	21:03
	→ caterfxo joined	21:03
shush	102% unsure of 42% of this	21:04
j416	I'd be happy to learn if I got this wrong; please do enlighten.	21:04
	also, what nedbat says is relevent. Since shush has the ref prefix, it's what accolades-redesign-components was one reflog entry prior.	21:05
	just to get that clear.	21:05
osse	Looks like you're right	21:05
j416	\^^/	21:06
	at least 17% right, I would like to think.	21:06
osse	How have I not noticed.	21:06
	← chandoo left	21:06
j416	I was also quite sure it was HEAD, until today.	21:07
	but not 100%	21:07
osse	Maybe it changed ten minutes ago	21:07
shush	I would hope you guys would use fractions for your confidence estimates 1/37th of the time	21:07
j416	I think so	21:07
	fractions are fake	21:07
shush	They're only fake by a factor of 0.134	21:08
	→ chandoo joined	21:10
	→ warthog9 joined	21:11
	← pupsikov left	21:14
	← chandoo left	21:22
	← cek left	21:26
	→ andrybak joined	21:26
	← tiin57 left	21:29
	→ multiproc joined	21:29
	→ tiin57 joined	21:33
	→ chandoo joined	21:36
	→ sunrunner20 joined	21:37
	→ fitzgerald1337_ joined	21:38
	→ zulutango joined	21:38
	← Dougie187 left	21:38
	← tafa2 left	21:39
	← shored left	21:39
	← fitzgerald1337 left	21:40
	→ shored joined	21:40
	→ irc_user joined	21:48
	→ tafa2 joined	21:48
	← silverwhitefish left	21:51
	← tiin57 left	21:59
	← tafa2 left	22:00
	→ tafa2 joined	22:01
	→ tiin57 joined	22:03
	← dre_ left	22:04
	← Ploppz left	22:07
	← Jackneill left	22:07
	← albel727 left	22:10
	← dmc left	22:11
	→ ferdna joined	22:11
	→ kantlivelong joined	22:13
	← CodeSlingerPaul left	22:13
	← caterfxo left	22:13
	← POQDavid left	22:14
	← nikivi left	22:14
	→ pikapika joined	22:15
	→ devster joined	22:15
	← funkatronixxx left	22:16
	→ POQDavid joined	22:16
	→ nikivi joined	22:16
rafasc	HEAD@{n} should be equivalent to @{-n}	22:16
	er, maybe not.	22:16
	→ caterfxo joined	22:17
j416	I think that's checkouts	22:17
	i.e. not counting resets or such	22:17
	could be wrong	22:17
	← pikapika left	22:17
j416	hm wait, isn't "-" short for @{-1} or something	22:17
	← meejah left	22:17
j416	I use - all the time but I forget what it's short for	22:17
rafasc	I think you're right, only for checkouts.	22:17
	→ orbitex joined	22:18
j416	oh, yeah, - for checkouts of course (I was thinking, it works for detached HEAD, so it must be also for resets, but obviously I'm too tired to even be typing this)	22:18
	→ pikapika joined	22:19
	← tafa2 left	22:22
	← stenno left	22:22
	→ magic_ninja_work joined	22:22
	← snakeice left	22:23
	fitzgerald1337_ → fitzgerald1337	22:25
	← DelPhyinf left	22:25
	← multiproc left	22:26
	← wootehfoot left	22:29
	→ multiproc joined	22:29
	← tiin57 left	22:29
	← mauz555 left	22:30
	→ mauz555 joined	22:30
	→ tiin57 joined	22:33
	→ tafa2 joined	22:34
	← mauz555 left	22:35
	← feriman left	22:35
	→ cbreak joined	22:40
	← chandoo left	22:41
	← tafa2 left	22:41
	← shush left	22:44
	→ shush joined	22:44
	→ vdamewood joined	22:45
	← shush left	22:49
	← ephemer0l_ left	22:49
	→ shush joined	22:50
	→ ephemer0l joined	22:51
	→ butterthebuddha joined	22:55
	→ mauz555 joined	22:56
	← tiin57 left	22:59
	← mauz555 left	23:01
	← lucasb left	23:02
	→ tiin57 joined	23:02
	→ scde joined	23:05
	← Dirak left	23:09
	← omnireq_ left	23:09
	→ jstein joined	23:10
	→ Dirak joined	23:13
	→ omnireq joined	23:13
	← multiproc left	23:15
	→ dmc joined	23:22
	← omnireq left	23:23
	← sbeyer left	23:23
	← cliluw left	23:27
	→ cliluw joined	23:28
	← justanotheruser left	23:28
	← tiin57 left	23:29
	→ tiin57 joined	23:33
	→ CryptoDavid joined	23:40
	→ justanotheruser joined	23:45
	→ prak2 joined	23:45
	→ oriba joined	23:46
	← fitzgerald1337 left	23:47
	← Phylock left	23:48
	→ omnireq joined	23:48
	← Guest38430 left	23:53
	→ buckworst joined	23:54
	← andrybak left	23:55
	→ mescalinum joined	23:55
	← scde left	23:56
	→ omnireq_ joined	23:57
	← NightStrike left	23:57
	← omnireq left	23:57
	← tiin57 left	23:59

Logs Search ←Prev date Next date→

Channels Documentation