IRCloggy #git 2020-09-24

Provider of IRC logs since 2005.

WARNING: As Freenode became unjoinable and lost all warnings in topics, we cannot log channels on Freenode anymore.

	2020-09-24
	→ igemnace joined	00:02
	→ SwiftMatt joined	00:05
	← deltab left	00:09
	← tiin57 left	00:11
	→ tiin57 joined	00:14
	← kerframil left	00:14
	→ Xenguy joined	00:14
	← maxzor left	00:15
	→ cim209 joined	00:16
	→ init joined	00:17
	← EvanCarroll left	00:17
	→ deltab joined	00:19
	← arcatech left	00:21
	← init left	00:22
	→ cdown_ joined	00:26
	→ Thorn joined	00:27
	→ tilpner_ joined	00:27
	← zebrag left	00:27
	← cdown left	00:29
	cdown_ → cdown	00:29
	← tilpner left	00:30
	tilpner_ → tilpner	00:30
	→ zebrag joined	00:30
	← tafa2 left	00:34
	→ jsatk joined	00:40
	← yamashitatan left	00:41
	→ Muimi joined	00:41
	← impermanence left	00:41
	← tiin57 left	00:41
jsatk	Hello. I'm suddenly having a hell of a time pushing a new remote to git. When I'm on `master` I run `git checkout -b foo` and then `git push --set-upstream origin foo` but when I run `git branch -vv` it shows that `foo` is pointed at `master` still. And the aformentioned push fails because git thinks I'm trying to push on top of `master` which is a protected branch.	00:41
	Any ideas what weird settings or config could be causing this? I've been using git for a decade... this is... strange.	00:42
	← Aki-lucky left	00:43
	← Gurkenglas left	00:43
	→ alesan joined	00:44
alesan	hello	00:44
	← relipse left	00:45
	→ tiin57 joined	00:45
alesan	I am using git in a scenario that I think is pretty common these dys, I have a remote called "origin" that has a MASTER branc, I clone it on my local machine, I create a different branch, I push it bach with push origin <branchname>	00:45
nedbat	sounds pretty standard	00:46
alesan	what I am asking is: why do I need to specify a branchname? Cannot just take the current branch name, UNLESS I want to push to a different branch?	00:46
	(and what would be the semantics to push to a different branch I am not sure)	00:46
nedbat	alesan: a great question. i don't know the answer	00:46
jsatk	nedbat: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37770467/why-do-i-have-to-git-push-set-upstream-origin-branch	00:47
alesan	OK thanks anyway :)	00:47
jsatk	i am over here stumped trying to figure out why the hell `git checkout -b foo && git push -u origin foo` is still causing `foo` to track against `master`.	00:48
	→ Wetmelon joined	00:51
	← kupi left	00:52
jsatk	Okay it's either something about branch.autosetupmerge=true or rebase.autosquash=true.	00:57
	← Wetmelon left	01:00
	← Irish left	01:01
	← Xenguy left	01:02
	→ Xenguy joined	01:02
	← SwiftMatt left	01:02
	→ POQDavid joined	01:04
	← vngx left	01:04
	← Jookia left	01:06
	→ yonder joined	01:10
	→ arcatech joined	01:10
	← tiin57 left	01:11
	← Xenguy left	01:11
	→ Tk55 joined	01:12
	← stats4647 left	01:13
	→ stats4647 joined	01:13
	→ tiin57 joined	01:14
	→ acetakwas joined	01:18
	← stats4647 left	01:18
	← F0rTex left	01:19
	← gschanuel left	01:20
	→ F0rTex joined	01:20
	→ gschanuel joined	01:21
	→ Jookia joined	01:22
	→ mud joined	01:24
	← leprechau left	01:27
	→ javashin joined	01:28
	→ davispuhh joined	01:28
	← davispuh left	01:30
	→ Xenguy joined	01:33
	→ fstd_ joined	01:34
	← AnAverageHuman left	01:35
	→ leprechau joined	01:36
	← fstd left	01:38
	fstd_ → fstd	01:38
	← tiin57 left	01:41
	→ tiin57 joined	01:44
	← acetakwas left	01:48
	← POQDavid left	01:49
	→ acetakwas joined	01:49
	→ drbean joined	01:50
	→ POQDavid joined	01:50
	→ stats4647 joined	01:50
	← POQDavid left	01:50
	→ POQDavid joined	01:51
	→ binTrl joined	01:51
	← binTrl left	01:54
	← acetakwas left	01:55
	← POQDavid left	01:55
	← arcatech left	01:55
	→ POQDavid joined	01:56
	→ acetakwas joined	01:56
	→ javashin_ joined	02:05
	→ AnAverageHuman joined	02:06
	→ arcatech joined	02:07
	← javashin left	02:08
	→ init joined	02:09
	← dfee left	02:09
	← arcatech left	02:10
	← tiin57 left	02:11
	← POQDavid left	02:11
	← acetakwas left	02:11
	→ dfee joined	02:11
	→ POQDavid joined	02:12
	→ acetakwas joined	02:12
	→ arcatech joined	02:12
	← init left	02:14
	→ tiin57 joined	02:15
	← arcatech left	02:17
	→ SwiftMatt joined	02:19
	→ Goplat joined	02:22
	← s2013 left	02:23
	→ marslander joined	02:25
	→ init joined	02:25
	lagothrix → Guest42381	02:29
	← Guest42381 left	02:29
	→ lagothrix joined	02:29
	← init left	02:30
	→ arcatech joined	02:30
	← gast0n left	02:32
	→ gast0n joined	02:34
	← POQDavid left	02:37
	← yousef9 left	02:37
	→ POQDavid joined	02:37
	← gast0n left	02:38
	← acetakwas left	02:38
	→ acetakwas joined	02:40
	← tiin57 left	02:41
	→ tiin57 joined	02:44
	→ init joined	02:44
	→ Cabanoss- joined	02:49
	← init left	02:49
	← Cabanossi left	02:49
	Cabanoss- → Cabanossi	02:49
	← SwiftMatt left	02:53
	← Jookia left	02:57
	← chachasmooth left	02:57
	→ kent\n joined	02:58
	→ chachasmooth joined	02:59
	→ tgunr joined	03:01
	→ Jookia joined	03:04
	← stats4647 left	03:06
	← wagle left	03:09
	→ wagle joined	03:10
	← tiin57 left	03:11
	→ sudoforge joined	03:14
	← mowcat left	03:14
	→ tiin57 joined	03:15
	← marslander left	03:15
	→ init joined	03:20
	← cuppajoeman left	03:24
	← oatmealraisin left	03:25
	← init left	03:25
	← wagle left	03:29
	→ wagle joined	03:29
	← Xiti left	03:30
	→ Xiti joined	03:32
	← davispuhh left	03:33
	← tiin57 left	03:41
	→ tiin57 joined	03:45
	→ Guest20 joined	03:48
	← powerhouse left	03:53
	← javashin_ left	03:55
	← AnAverageHuman left	04:02
	← acetakwas left	04:02
	← POQDavid left	04:02
	→ acetakwas joined	04:03
	→ POQDavid joined	04:04
	← n-st left	04:06
	← thomasross left	04:10
	← tiin57 left	04:11
	→ buckworst joined	04:11
	← Thominus left	04:12
	← buckworst left	04:13
	→ tiin57 joined	04:14
	→ mat001_ joined	04:15
	← mat001 left	04:17
	→ pikapika joined	04:17
	→ n-st joined	04:21
	← vicfred left	04:22
	→ vicfred joined	04:24
	→ a-l-e joined	04:26
	← dermoth left	04:28
	→ dermoth joined	04:30
	→ s2013 joined	04:36
	→ crose joined	04:36
	→ powerhouse joined	04:40
	← tiin57 left	04:41
	→ tiin57 joined	04:44
	← drbean left	04:48
	→ init joined	04:55
	→ wgrant joined	04:57
	← init left	05:02
	← meropyri left	05:03
	→ meropyri joined	05:03
	← zrhoffman left	05:09
	← tiin57 left	05:11
	→ matelot joined	05:14
	→ tiin57 joined	05:14
	← Abbott left	05:26
	→ Abbott joined	05:26
	→ mightyjens joined	05:30
	→ mirrorbird joined	05:30
	→ init joined	05:32
	→ SwiftMatt joined	05:33
	← sudoforge left	05:36
	← init left	05:38
	→ stats4647 joined	05:39
	← kent\n left	05:40
	← tiin57 left	05:41
	→ kent\n joined	05:41
	← stats4647 left	05:44
	→ tiin57 joined	05:44
	→ theoceaniscool joined	05:49
	← Xenguy left	05:52
	→ ekh joined	05:53
	→ Xenguy joined	05:54
	← geosmile left	05:55
	← jaziz left	05:56
	← SwiftMatt left	05:58
	← arcatech left	06:05
	→ macrover joined	06:06
	← mir100 left	06:07
	→ karab44 joined	06:11
	→ SwiftMatt joined	06:11
	← tiin57 left	06:11
	← thiago left	06:11
	→ rfuentess joined	06:13
	→ tiin57 joined	06:14
	→ mat001 joined	06:14
	← mirrorbird left	06:15
	→ fatalhalt joined	06:15
	← SwiftMatt left	06:16
	← mat001_ left	06:16
	→ stats4647 joined	06:19
	→ konrados joined	06:23
	← stats4647 left	06:24
	← VectorX left	06:26
	← karab44 left	06:31
	→ OnkelBlade joined	06:37
	← tiin57 left	06:41
	← Muimi left	06:44
	→ tiin57 joined	06:44
	← irc_user left	06:45
	← txtsd left	06:48
	→ tarkus joined	06:48
jsatk	I figured it out. It's `autosetupmerge = always` that I'd added to my gitconfig. I thought I understand what it did but clearly not...	06:50
	→ chele joined	06:50
osse	alesan: if you add -u to the first push from the new branch, you can then just use 'git push' with no args thereafter	06:52
	→ R2robot joined	06:55
	← causasui left	06:56
	→ KnoP joined	06:58
	→ VectorX joined	06:58
	← theoceaniscool left	07:00
	← unluckyshrubbery left	07:02
	← FH_thecat left	07:05
	→ FH_thecat joined	07:05
	← matelot left	07:05
	→ SerialSmile joined	07:06
	→ oxymoron93 joined	07:08
	← tiin57 left	07:11
	→ Muimi joined	07:11
	← hussam left	07:13
	→ Mattiaslndstrm joined	07:14
	→ tiin57 joined	07:15
	← justanotheruser left	07:16
	← Mattiaslndstrm left	07:18
	← crose left	07:21
	→ txtsd joined	07:22
	→ crose joined	07:22
	← Goplat left	07:28
	→ kegger joined	07:29
	→ nikivi joined	07:31
	→ PJBoy joined	07:31
	→ causasui joined	07:31
	← a-l-e left	07:32
	→ Exagone313 joined	07:34
	← Exagone313 left	07:34
	→ shtrb joined	07:34
	→ mirrorbird joined	07:34
	→ Exagone313 joined	07:34
shtrb	Is "Received disconnect from ip: 11: Bye Bye" message specific to a provider or general for git and can indicate some kind of user problem ?	07:35
	→ feriman joined	07:36
	← kjartan left	07:37
	→ nee joined	07:37
	← fatalhalt left	07:37
	← nee left	07:38
	→ kjartan joined	07:39
	← tiin57 left	07:41
	← vicfred left	07:43
	→ vicfred joined	07:43
	→ tiin57 joined	07:44
	← s2013 left	07:48
	→ a-l-e joined	07:49
selckin	google says, its ssh auth failure	07:49
shtrb	I doubt it as I got it mid clone (after getting over 200 mb)	07:51
	→ wrobinso1 joined	07:51
shtrb	Or is there several times an auth is being done during clone ?	07:52
	← wrobinson left	07:54
	→ benfelin joined	07:59
	→ wrksx_ joined	08:00
	← wrksx left	08:00
selckin	are you the user or provider	08:01
	← mightyjens left	08:05
	← FH_thecat left	08:05
shtrb	user	08:06
selckin	other ppl complaining on google, its either ppl trying to brute force login (doesn't apply here i would say), or maybe some incompatible ssh versions obscure bug, but i can't find references to the bye bye error message in openssh code	08:06
shtrb	that happend with github , I had disconnects in the past but not with "Bye Bye"message	08:06
	running the same command few seconds later seem to work just fine (which is odd ) .	08:07
	Could it be something related to the provider ?	08:08
	→ maxzor joined	08:08
selckin	on windows?	08:08
shtrb	yes	08:08
selckin	what does 'ssh -vT [email@hidden.address] say, give the error?	08:09
	→ stats4647 joined	08:09
	→ FH_thecat joined	08:09
shtrb	I do not get that error	08:10
	I have a passphrase if it have any implications	08:10
	← konrados left	08:11
	← tiin57 left	08:11
shtrb	and on win10 pro	08:11
selckin	then you need to update your ssh version probably	08:11
shtrb	thanks , will try	08:11
	→ tafa2 joined	08:11
	→ tiin57 joined	08:14
	← stats4647 left	08:16
	→ a-l-e--- joined	08:16
	← SerialSmile left	08:17
	→ zrhoffman joined	08:17
	← a-l-e left	08:19
	← chele left	08:19
	← yonder left	08:20
alesan	osse, it has to be the very first push with -u, or it can be at any time?	08:21
	→ clara97 joined	08:21
clara97	hi	08:21
osse	alesan: any time	08:21
	alesan: -u sets up tracking info	08:22
	after that git push alone will work	08:22
clara97	if I want to read commitment in 2days	08:22
	what should I do?	08:22
shtrb	selckin, I had found the issue , if I enter a correct passphrase after 90 seconds it fails	08:22
alesan	I'll try but	08:23
	I am absolutely surprised - why a push isn't done by default to a branch of the same exact name UNLESS a different one is specified? Is it a technical limitation of GIT?	08:24
	or is it a design choice	08:24
osse	that too is configurable	08:24
	man git-config, see push.default	08:25
gitinfo	the git-config manpage is available at https://gitirc.eu/git-config.html	08:25
	→ mat001_ joined	08:25
alesan	there must be something I fail to understand because I cannot think of a use case where one wouldn't want that to be the default	08:25
	ok thanks	08:25
	out of curiosity - who is the git developer? Still Mr. L. Torvalds or now is somebody else?	08:26
osse	alesan: it sounds like you want to change push.default to current	08:26
alesan	osse, maybe, I'll need to make sure on the documentation	08:26
	:D thanks	08:26
	→ Gurkenglas joined	08:26
osse	alesan: it's not a single guy.	08:26
	← mat001 left	08:27
ikke	Junio C. Hamano is the maintainer	08:27
osse	Torvalds wrote the initial implementation and became the maintainer. After a while a new guy took over as maintainer.	08:27
	alesan: actually, next time just run 'git push' without any args. either it does what you want immediately or it will tell you want to do	08:28
	→ unluckyshrubbery joined	08:30
clara97	hello what should I do to read log in 2daysv	08:32
	?	08:32
osse	what do you mean?	08:32
	← bvdw left	08:33
clara97	I just want to read commits in 2 days	08:33
	→ bvdw joined	08:33
osse	then run 'git log' in 2 days	08:33
clara97	git log would return all log?	08:34
Jookia	clara97: do you over the past two days or do you mean you will be reading two commits on friday	08:34
clara97	the past 2 days	08:35
osse	git log --since='2 days ago'	08:39
	→ calcul0n joined	08:40
	← tiin57 left	08:41
clara97	thanks	08:41
Jookia	osse: is that the same as 'git log ..@{2 days ago}' and is that all the commits within 2 days, so inclusive, or does it miss one?	08:42
	→ cosimone joined	08:44
	← kegger left	08:44
	→ tiin57 joined	08:44
osse	Jookia: it's not the same	08:45
	as for whehter it's inclusive, I'm not sure	08:46
	→ mozgalom joined	08:48
	← meropyri left	08:48
	→ meropyri joined	08:49
	← downunder left	08:52
	← OnkelBlade left	08:53
	→ nelgin joined	08:53
nelgin	Hi all, this may be a stupid question but I don't use git much, only as an end user. When using git pull I find some filenames are truncted by prefixing with ... - Is there any way to force the whole path to be printed regardless of the number of columns? I use the result of the git pull to do certain things with certain files, but I need the full path. Thanks.	08:54
pa	hi, why git reset HEAD^ somefile produces both a staged and an unstaged change for that file?	08:57
nkuttler	nelgin: hm, i'd probably ask for an explicit list of files, not use a tool that does something else and dumps random info	08:58
	nelgin: like git fetch && git diff --name-only <remote>	08:58
	← cd left	08:58
nelgin	Well, it wouldn't be random to me if it had the full path.	08:58
osse	nelgin: you can configure the width of a diffstat. maybe pull respects those settings	08:59
	try git config diff.statGraphWidth 999999	08:59
	→ downunder joined	08:59
osse	no that's the graph part, bleh	09:00
	→ init joined	09:01
osse	try git config diff.statGraphWidth 80,99999	09:01
nelgin	OK, I set that. I'll see wht happens next time I do a pull.	09:02
osse	the comma version doesn't work	09:02
	you can test it by doing git reset --hard @~5 and pulling again	09:02
	← DerHorst left	09:03
nelgin	fatal: bad numeric config value '80,99999' for 'diff.statgraphwidth': invalid unit	09:03
	Ah my bad.	09:03
	Hang on	09:04
	Oh nope. I thought it was case issue but I entered as you gave me.	09:04
osse	the comma thing was a guess	09:05
	→ OnkelBlade joined	09:05
	← init left	09:06
nelgin	It only checked out 5 items when I did a git pull and none of them over 80 chars. Oh well.	09:06
osse	after a pull git prints out something like "Updating 01146e6757..2460146bdb"	09:07
	you can then do git diff --stat=999 01146e6757..2460146bdb	09:07
nelgin	Yup, shows me the same thing pretty much.	09:08
	← txtsd left	09:08
pa	nvm, gotcha	09:08
nelgin	I think it might be because the author added a new tag.	09:09
	Looks like these are just updates since the it changed.	09:09
	← tiin57 left	09:11
	→ imp joined	09:12
	→ chele joined	09:12
	← hineios left	09:12
nelgin	No, that didn't work, still get truncated files.	09:12
osse	what did not	09:12
nelgin	Using the width thing	09:13
osse	it diff --stat=999 ?	09:13
	the config won't work	09:13
nelgin	Ah yes, let me try that	09:13
	→ tiin57 joined	09:14
	→ karab44 joined	09:14
nelgin	Ah yes, that looks better.	09:14
	→ txtsd joined	09:15
	→ jaziz joined	09:17
alesan	osse, OK thanks	09:19
	→ Lucas_Gray joined	09:20
	← OnkelBlade left	09:22
	← cosimone left	09:22
	→ OnkelBlade joined	09:24
	→ wolfshappen joined	09:24
	← tonyj left	09:26
	→ cosimone joined	09:27
	→ clime joined	09:33
	→ dionysus69 joined	09:35
	→ T_UNIX joined	09:39
	← Betal left	09:40
	← tiin57 left	09:41
	→ tiin57 joined	09:44
	→ NeoCron joined	09:47
	← karab44 left	09:49
	← RandomGuy90 left	09:50
	→ RandomGuy90 joined	09:51
	← macrover left	09:52
	→ hussam joined	09:54
	← Shentino left	09:54
	← Lucas_Gray left	09:56
	← alesan left	09:59
	→ Shentino joined	10:00
	→ tonyj joined	10:03
	← maxzor left	10:03
	← crose left	10:09
	← tiin57 left	10:11
	→ sudoforge joined	10:12
	← tafa2 left	10:13
	→ tiin57 joined	10:14
	← sudoforge left	10:20
	→ walidvb joined	10:21
walidvb	hey all! After years of dev, i'm finally collaborating with someone!	10:22
	I'm wondering how to handle the flow, specifically around pull requests. When I review it, should i rebase it on master?	10:23
	if i do so, i'll need to push -f to github before merging the branch(or do it locally)	10:23
	→ vngx joined	10:23
walidvb	should the author of the PR do this himself? in which case, it sounds like an endless loop if master is committed to frequently 🤔	10:23
	and if i merge master, i'm adding an unnecessary commit	10:24
	Dreadnaught → Kulrak	10:28
	→ init joined	10:28
	→ va5c0 joined	10:28
	← OnkelBlade left	10:30
	← va5c0 left	10:31
	→ va5c0 joined	10:33
Jookia	walidvb: congrats! are you the project maintainer?	10:33
walidvb	i am :)	10:33
	← va5c0 left	10:34
	→ va5c0 joined	10:34
Jookia	generally the easiest and least complicated way is to merge PRs in to your main branch. rebases are more for the PR makers to do if needed	10:34
walidvb	although it's a private repo	10:35
	← va5c0 left	10:35
Jookia	rebases are good for patch sets, merges are good when you have git repos	10:36
walidvb	but then, when i check the work of that PR, it's not on par, no?	10:36
Jookia	what do you mean not on par? do you mean the work is bad, or it's not based on the latest code?	10:38
	merging will bring in all the changes in the PR on to the latest code	10:38
walidvb	i mean not based	10:39
	but i will bring code to master that hasn't been tested with master	10:39
	so either way it feels like master should be on the branch i'm checking (it could even be that merging the PR brings a regression)	10:40
Jookia	well, master is a moving target	10:40
	and a lot of changes don't affect other code	10:40
walidvb	in terms of conflicts, it sounds to me that i would want to merge master to the PR before testing and merging it	10:40
Jookia	the master branch is generally considered a development branch, where things may be broken	10:41
	← tiin57 left	10:41
walidvb	in terms of history, i'd rebase, but that breaks the ability to merge etc	10:41
Jookia	rebasing PRs shouldn't break ability to merge	10:42
	← txtsd left	10:42
	→ fossegrim joined	10:43
	→ Muimi_ joined	10:43
Jookia	never rebase a branch people are using (like master)	10:43
walidvb	that's what i meant	10:43
Jookia	your concerns are very real, but usually this is solved without git, but by CI	10:44
	where the bot will grab the branch, merge it, then test to see if it works	10:44
walidvb	fair	10:44
	→ tiin57 joined	10:44
	← init left	10:45
osse	but master might move ahead while the CI is working.... It will never be perfect	10:45
	→ txtsd joined	10:46
	← Trieste left	10:46
	← Muimi left	10:46
	Muimi_ → Muimi	10:46
walidvb	i'm not sure i agree with the statement that master is considered dev	10:46
	→ stats4647 joined	10:46
	→ sQVe joined	10:46
Jookia	walidvb: well, you can create a develop/stable/etc branch. master is kind of a vague term	10:47
walidvb	fir	10:47
	fair*	10:47
	and true, the CI would not deploy if the test fails	10:47
Jookia	generally projects have layers of branches depending on how tested a feature is	10:48
	← a-l-e--- left	10:48
Jookia	which the top layer being tagged release that gets shipped to users	10:48
	and the bottom being a feature in development	10:48
	→ Trieste joined	10:48
osse	One goal of the Git git repo is that master is at any point better than the latest release :p	10:50
	→ Muimi_ joined	10:50
walidvb	brb sry	10:51
	← stats4647 left	10:51
	← DiffieHellman left	10:52
	← Muimi left	10:52
	Muimi_ → Muimi	10:53
	→ DiffieHellman joined	10:53
	← DiffieHellman left	10:56
walidvb	we're 2 ppl, i'm trying to keep it to a minimum	10:56
osse	If this is new to you then I wouldn't overthink it	10:57
	if the PR looks good, merge it	10:57
walidvb	used to use git-flow, but was.a bit tricky to push rc to my team, especially because one feature could prevent another to make it to prod	10:58
	← Fusl left	10:58
walidvb	so switched to feature br only, which seems more convenient	10:58
Jookia	walidvb: this is just a classic concurrency issue :D	10:58
walidvb	also, at first i had little to no automated testing on my frontend, so it was quite risky to push without manual testing	10:59
	→ Fusl joined	10:59
walidvb	that's changed now though, so indeed i'm more confident in the changes brought in	10:59
Jookia	my small team working is 'have your own branch with what you're working on so we can check out and try it', cherry-pick stuff you like from the branch, then make them PRs for review that get merged to unstable	10:59
	→ haymawk joined	11:00
walidvb	Jookia: thx	11:00
	osse: that sounds reasonable, too :)	11:00
	← clara97 left	11:00
walidvb	still need to set up my cli. setup is a bit complex, as it's a rails rspec running against an expo frontnd (which is currently not served by rails, but standalone – hosted on firebase for ease)	11:02
	→ jomo_ joined	11:02
walidvb	i'm thinking a githubaction that pushes my front to test.reveel.id, and Capybara that loads that url(which in turns hits my localhost:7357 test api)	11:03
	but i had some issues, and had to move on. will take another look at some point soon i hope!	11:04
	bit of a bummer not to see the test state in the PR (for me, i run my tests before submitting a PR )	11:04
	← opal left	11:09
	→ opal joined	11:10
	→ crose joined	11:10
	← tiin57 left	11:11
	→ calcul0n_ joined	11:13
	← calcul0n left	11:13
	← ch left	11:15
	→ tiin57 joined	11:15
	← mat001_ left	11:15
	→ mat001 joined	11:15
	→ init joined	11:19
	← init left	11:24
	→ kdlv joined	11:25
	← tarkus left	11:27
	→ OnkelBlade joined	11:30
	→ TomyWork joined	11:36
	→ DiffieHellman joined	11:36
	→ tafa2 joined	11:40
	→ cdown_ joined	11:40
	← tiin57 left	11:41
	← cdown left	11:42
	cdown_ → cdown	11:43
	→ Mattiaslndstrm joined	11:43
	→ tiin57 joined	11:44
	← tafa2 left	11:46
	← shabius left	11:50
	→ Muimi_ joined	11:51
	← Muimi left	11:53
	Muimi_ → Muimi	11:53
	← nikivi left	11:54
	→ vdamewood joined	11:54
	→ nikivi joined	11:54
	→ maxzor joined	11:55
	← g00s left	11:56
	← nikivi left	11:57
	← acetakwas left	11:57
	← mirrorbird left	11:57
	→ nikivi joined	11:57
	→ acetakwas joined	11:57
	→ stats4647 joined	11:59
	→ shabius joined	12:00
	→ Muimi_ joined	12:02
	← Muimi left	12:03
	Muimi_ → Muimi	12:03
	← stats4647 left	12:04
	→ canadev joined	12:07
	← jaziz left	12:09
	← tiin57 left	12:11
	← Guest20 left	12:12
	→ tiin57 joined	12:14
	→ denel joined	12:15
	← Trieste left	12:17
	→ Trieste joined	12:21
	← feriman left	12:21
	→ CodeSlingerPaul joined	12:32
	→ macrover joined	12:38
	← tiin57 left	12:41
	← benfelin left	12:41
	→ mirrorbird joined	12:43
	→ tiin57 joined	12:44
	← Jookia left	12:47
	← ekh left	12:48
	→ Jookia joined	12:48
	← fling left	12:54
	← Xenguy left	12:55
	→ fling joined	12:56
	→ Maxattax joined	12:56
	→ dohzer joined	13:00
	→ Anticom joined	13:00
	→ stats4647 joined	13:04
	→ a-l-e joined	13:06
	← stats4647 left	13:09
	← tiin57 left	13:11
	→ tiin57 joined	13:14
	← mirrorbird left	13:17
	→ Guest20 joined	13:18
walidvb	one other thing i'm not too sure how to handle, is the fact that i smtimes do work on a branch, PR it, and then switch to another feature, that potentially requires some changes from that previous branch(but don't necessarily rely on the feature itself. eg. a bugfix/refactor). I'm guessing the best answer is to either switch to master, bugfix, and commit, or to be careful to commit only the bugfix and cherry-pick it?	13:19
	← Gurkenglas left	13:19
	← howdoi left	13:20
	← POQDavid left	13:20
	→ init joined	13:20
	← pikapika left	13:21
	→ pikapika joined	13:21
	→ POQDavid joined	13:21
	← init left	13:25
	→ benfelin joined	13:27
	→ gast0n joined	13:29
	← denel left	13:32
	→ denel joined	13:33
	→ clara97 joined	13:36
	← Guest20 left	13:36
cdunklau	walidvb: cherry picking is a slippery slope	13:37
Jookia	walidvb: yeah that's why i have a general branch then focus on making PRs once the work is done	13:38
walidvb	but the PR takes some time to be merged, right? what if you want to jump right in the next feature, but therefore can't take advantage of some new code that your wrote(a new module, some perf optim, a bugfix)?	13:39
cdunklau	walidvb: then you're screwed	13:40
Jookia	that's ideally why you have a personal integration branch	13:41
cdunklau	walidvb: or you branch from the PR	13:41
	← tiin57 left	13:41
leah2	i noticed a weird thing, maybe someone can explain. i use pull.ff=only and sometimes "git pull" says "fatal: Not possible to fast-forward, aborting." When I then run "git pull --rebase" it says "Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/master."	13:41
	but the commit hash is exactly the remote hash, so what did it rebase, and why didnt ff work?	13:41
cdunklau	leah2: what's reflog say	13:42
leah2	cbb02bde (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) HEAD@{0}: pull --rebase (finish): returning to refs/heads/master	13:44
	→ tiin57 joined	13:44
leah2	cbb02bde (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) HEAD@{1}: pull --rebase (start): checkout cbb02bdec98f37e3f7f9863dab7f88ec3471714d	13:44
	so it didnt do anything, right?	13:44
cdunklau	leah2: huh	13:45
leah2	hmm, maybe it did	13:45
	my previous HEAD was actually a patch i merged	13:45
	s maybe this was legit :p	13:46
	→ Xiti` joined	13:46
Jookia	maybe the rebase was a no-op if your HEAD was identical to the origin's HEAD but diferent hashes	13:46
	→ init joined	13:47
	← Xiti left	13:47
cdunklau	leah2: what's rev-parse say for master and origin/master	13:48
	→ mirrorbird joined	13:48
	← bamdad left	13:48
	→ bamdad joined	13:49
	← bamdad left	13:49
	→ bamdad joined	13:49
leah2	well after the rebase they are the same ofc?	13:50
	→ Aki-lucky joined	13:51
	← Aki-lucky left	13:51
	→ Aki-lucky joined	13:52
	→ ch joined	13:52
	→ irc_user joined	13:57
	← Kaivo left	13:58
	← nikivi left	13:58
	→ nikivi joined	13:59
	← POQDavid left	13:59
	→ POQDavid joined	13:59
	← nikivi left	14:00
	→ nikivi joined	14:00
	← Xiti` left	14:00
	→ Kaivo joined	14:00
	← foul_owl left	14:01
	→ Muimi_ joined	14:01
	→ foul_owl joined	14:02
	← Muimi left	14:05
	Muimi_ → Muimi	14:05
	→ rafasc joined	14:07
	→ howdoi joined	14:10
	← tiin57 left	14:11
	← Mattiaslndstrm left	14:11
	← sgn left	14:14
	→ tiin57 joined	14:14
	→ malmalmal joined	14:19
	→ [twisti] joined	14:21
[twisti]	can i configure the diff used by git add -p ? or in any way have to tell me what whitespace changes its asking me to stage or not ?	14:21
	→ oatmealraisin joined	14:22
	← reprazent left	14:29
walidvb	cdunklau: yeah... i'll see when/how that comes up. thanks!	14:30
	→ Xiti joined	14:30
Jookia	leah2: rebasing should apply your cahnges on top so the only thing i can think of is that for some reason rebasing was a no-op, leaving just the origin/master instead of adding a commit on top	14:31
	→ binarymutt joined	14:31
	→ stats4647 joined	14:31
leah2	yes, it was	14:32
rafasc	[twisti]: not really, but there's a contrib script: https://github.com/git/git/tree/master/contrib/git-jump	14:32
	[twisti]: that allows you to jump to places where there are whitespace errors with: git jump ws	14:33
	Or you could run diff --check; and over it manually.	14:33
	→ reprazent joined	14:36
	← tiin57 left	14:41
	← Fusl left	14:43
	→ Lucas_Gray joined	14:44
	→ Fusl joined	14:44
	→ tiin57 joined	14:44
	← stats4647 left	14:45
	→ stats4647 joined	14:46
	→ thiago joined	14:46
	→ relipse joined	14:48
	→ s2013 joined	14:49
	← sQVe left	14:52
	← sweatsuit left	14:54
	← mozgalom left	14:54
	→ sweatsuit joined	14:57
	→ sgn joined	14:59
	→ cdown_ joined	15:07
	← cdown left	15:10
	cdown_ → cdown	15:10
	← tiin57 left	15:11
	← Lucas_Gray left	15:11
	→ Lucas_Gray joined	15:12
	→ tiin57 joined	15:14
	→ theoceaniscool joined	15:16
	→ tarkus joined	15:20
	→ AnAverageHuman joined	15:24
	→ mowcat joined	15:26
	← oxymoron93 left	15:26
	← mowcat left	15:27
	← kdlv left	15:27
	→ Papillon joined	15:28
	→ mir100 joined	15:30
	→ jmejias joined	15:30
	→ timvisher joined	15:31
timvisher	Is there a better way to check that a branch contains a commit from a script than `git branch <branch> --contains <sha>`? I'm seeing a warning that my terminal isn't fully functional when running from automation and I'm thinking that I'm smelling non-porcelain.	15:32
	← KnoP left	15:33
timvisher	I can always `>/dev/null 2>&1` obviously but I usually don't have to when using the right tool.	15:33
ikke	timvisher: git merge-base --is-ancestor	15:33
	You are probably getting that message from the pager, although, that should not be invoked in non-interactive usage	15:34
	← malmalmal left	15:35
	← chele left	15:36
	← maxzor left	15:36
	← rfuentess left	15:40
	← tiin57 left	15:41
timvisher	ikke: Thank you! Just so I'm clear if I'm reading the docs correctly it would be `git merge-base --is-ancestor <sha> <branch>` which would test that <sha> is an ancestor (or not) of <branch>. Rather than where I started which was `…or <branch> <sha>` which would assert that <branch> is an ancestor of <sha>.	15:42
	In my testing that looks correct.	15:42
	→ tiin57 joined	15:44
	← clara97 left	15:45
	→ masber2 joined	15:46
masber2	hi, I made the mistake of making changes in a branch different than master which should have been make into a different branch. Is there a way I can change my current branch to master, pull and then move to changes to this new branch?	15:48
Jookia	masber2: so you have 3 branches: A, B, and master, and you accidentally committed to A instead of B? and now you want to update master then bring changes from master in to A or B?	15:50
	← timvisher left	15:50
	→ timvisher joined	15:52
	← walidvb left	15:53
timvisher	ikke: Sorry I got kicked off if you said anything. If you did would you mind resending it? Otherwise sorry for the noise. :)	15:54
ikke	Didn't reply yet	15:54
	← pa left	15:55
timvisher	No worries.	15:55
ikke	But what you said appears correct	15:56
timvisher	Thanks. :)	15:56
	→ pa joined	15:58
	← tgunr left	16:02
	← noonien left	16:02
masber2	Jookia, I have 2 branches masber and A, I made changes in A but those changes should go to a new branch B from master. I am still in A with the changes and I have not commited yet	16:03
	hope that clarifies...	16:04
Jookia	masber2: Ah. They're not comitted yet? Stash, check out master, branch from it, then stash pop	16:04
	→ Betal joined	16:04
masber2	thanks!	16:05
	← shtrb left	16:06
	→ scoobertron joined	16:07
	→ arcatech joined	16:07
	← tarkus left	16:09
	→ Wetmelon joined	16:09
	← timvisher left	16:09
	← AnAverageHuman left	16:10
	← tiin57 left	16:11
	← Muimi left	16:13
	→ mat001_ joined	16:13
	← Lucas_Gray left	16:14
	→ tiin57 joined	16:14
	← mat001 left	16:16
	→ sudoforge joined	16:17
	← squirrel left	16:18
	→ justanotheruser joined	16:20
	← Papillon left	16:20
	→ squirrel joined	16:20
	→ prominentpotato joined	16:20
	← prominentpotato left	16:21
	→ yamashitatan joined	16:21
	← dohzer left	16:25
	← tiin57 left	16:41
	← pikapika left	16:41
	← acetakwas left	16:41
	→ cdown_ joined	16:41
	→ pikapika joined	16:41
	← pikapika left	16:42
	→ pikapika joined	16:42
	→ acetakwas joined	16:43
	← cdown left	16:44
	cdown_ → cdown	16:44
	→ tiin57 joined	16:44
	← scoobertron left	16:45
	→ Lucas_Gray joined	16:46
dermoth	Is there a way to have current screen go up in the scrollback buffer when we either clear the terminal or	16:48
	→ raymond joined	16:48
	→ aliss joined	16:48
dermoth	... or start an app using a screen (vim, less, etc...)	16:49
	→ thomasross joined	16:50
	← arcatech left	16:50
	← opal left	16:51
Jookia	dermoth: did you try the scroll wheel	16:51
dermoth	actually, it works here...not at work	16:52
	maybe diff version, or something different in the libraries (Debian vs RHEL7)	16:52
	→ mat001 joined	16:53
	← mat001_ left	16:54
	← Lucas_Gray left	16:56
dermoth	Ha nm, I had "URxvt.SecondaryScreen" instead of "URxvt.secondaryScreen" - and I thought that was case-insensitive anyway....	16:59
	clear still erases the screen but that is less of an issue, the secondary screen was really annoying though (I set it to false)	17:00
	← mir100 left	17:00
	→ arcatech joined	17:01
	→ BackupBackupNick joined	17:01
dermoth	I have another odd problem but having a hard time isolating it.... sometimes using ipmiconsole long lines end up in netherland, they're truncated on edge with only the last char of them (resizing doesn't help). Reset fixes it but it also clears scroll, whhich is a bit annoying. I tried tset too but it doesn't fixes it	17:03
	← Aki-lucky left	17:03
	← canadev left	17:04
	← arcatech left	17:05
	→ arcatech joined	17:08
	← cosimone left	17:09
	← tiin57 left	17:11
	← PJBoy left	17:13
	→ Human_G33k joined	17:14
	→ tiin57 joined	17:14
	→ impermanence joined	17:15
	← HumanGeek left	17:17
	← masber2 left	17:18
	← cdown left	17:19
	→ leeN joined	17:20
	→ sunova joined	17:27
	→ cosimone joined	17:31
	← binarymutt left	17:31
	→ feriman joined	17:32
	← tiin57 left	17:41
	→ tiin57 joined	17:44
	← aliss left	17:50
	← TomyWork left	17:56
	← macrover left	17:58
	→ macrover joined	18:05
	→ snatcher joined	18:05
snatcher	is there a sort of unique id for master? at least need unique id for master on github, saw some unique id (checksum?) for some releases on gihub	18:05
	← macrover left	18:07
	→ cd joined	18:07
	→ zumba_addict joined	18:08
	← T_UNIX left	18:08
	← Jookia left	18:09
	→ Jookia joined	18:10
	← tiin57 left	18:11
	→ opal joined	18:11
	← Lunatrius left	18:14
	→ mat001_ joined	18:14
	→ tiin57 joined	18:14
	→ Lunatrius joined	18:15
nedbat	snatcher: unique id in what sense? "master" is a unique id	18:15
snatcher	nedbat: in sens of repository/branch content	18:16
	← mat001 left	18:16
	→ cuppajoeman joined	18:16
	→ jstein joined	18:17
nedbat	snatcher: do you want an id that always means "current master"? and where do you want to use this id? for what?	18:17
	snatcher: can you say more about the problem you are solving?	18:18
j416	snatcher: are you referring to a commit hash?	18:18
	→ davispuh joined	18:18
	→ alesan joined	18:18
	← Anticom left	18:20
snatcher	need to build binary pkg from master branch with version identifier represented state of branch	18:22
osse	snatcher: git rev-parse master	18:23
	← bocaneri left	18:23
osse	if you want to build something and you know the hash: git checkout hash'	18:24
	→ cahoots joined	18:29
cahoots	hi, i'd like to use "--shallow-since=" to just clone with that commit. like i can do "--shallow-since='1 day'", but that might include more commits than just the very most recent one. any ideas?	18:30
	← nelgin left	18:31
	← opal left	18:32
j416	cahoots: --depth	18:33
cahoots	j416, for various complicated reasons, i can only use shallow-since	18:34
	→ Mattiaslndstrm joined	18:36
j416	then go through the necessary hoops to arrive at a date	18:36
	← corelax left	18:36
	→ opal joined	18:37
	← tiin57 left	18:41
	← BackupBackupNick left	18:42
	← Betal left	18:43
	← a-l-e left	18:44
	← pikapika left	18:44
	← nikivi left	18:44
	← acetakwas left	18:44
	→ tiin57 joined	18:45
	→ acetakwas joined	18:45
	→ pikapika joined	18:45
	→ nikivi joined	18:45
	← nikivi left	18:46
	→ nikivi joined	18:46
shailangsa	does anybody know the command to git clone https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/misc/+/refs/tags/android-7.1.2_r29/linux-x86/flex/ , im running this command https://pastebin.com/8xHgjvf4 why isnt it cloning it?	18:47
stats4647	shailangsa: doesn't look like the repo exists?	18:51
	← Mattiaslndstrm left	18:51
j416	shailangsa: git clone https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/misc	18:52
	shailangsa: your attempt fails because you're trying to clone something that isn't a repo	18:52
shailangsa	do i need to clone the whole repo if i just want this tree https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/misc/+/refs/tags/android-7.1.2_r29/linux-x86/flex/ ?	18:53
	← feriman left	18:53
	→ feriman joined	18:56
j416	shailangsa: if the remote supports it, you can use git-archive	18:59
	shailangsa: there is also a handy link to download that, on the site you linked to.	19:00
	that remote does not appear to support archive.	19:01
	→ PJBoy joined	19:01
	ch1astre → chiastre	19:04
	→ macrover joined	19:06
	← zumba_addict left	19:06
shailangsa	im tried to git clone the mentioned repo with the branch https://pastebin.com/Lqq4kwcL but it clones the whole repo again (2GB) instead of just the android-7.1.2_r29 branch , why is that?	19:07
	← pikapika left	19:07
	→ ekh joined	19:07
	← acetakwas left	19:08
	→ pikapika joined	19:08
	→ acetakwas joined	19:08
	← nikivi left	19:08
	→ nikivi joined	19:09
	← pikapika left	19:09
cdunklau	shailangsa: because it's a clone	19:10
	→ pikapika joined	19:10
j416	shailangsa: I don't think -b limits what gets cloned; you'll get a full clone still.	19:10
cdunklau	shailangsa: -b just changes what branch gets checked out	19:10
	you probably want --single-branch	19:10
	← tiin57 left	19:11
cdunklau	shailangsa: or probably even `--depth 1`	19:11
	→ corelax joined	19:11
j416	shailangsa: what are you trying to achieve?	19:11
cdunklau	shailangsa: note that this won't help you if you want to actually work on the code	19:11
	→ Narrat joined	19:12
cdunklau	a shallow clone is for all intents and purposes read-only	19:12
	at least, not-useful-for-contributing-upstream	19:12
j416	shailangsa: curl -O https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/misc/+archive/refs/tags/android-7.1.2_r29/linux-x86/flex.tar.gz	19:12
	→ tiin57 joined	19:15
	→ mat001 joined	19:23
	← macrover left	19:25
	→ zumba_addict joined	19:26
	← snatcher left	19:26
	← mat001_ left	19:27
	→ Darcidride joined	19:28
	← PJBoy left	19:40
	← tiin57 left	19:41
	← yamashitatan left	19:41
	→ nurdie joined	19:44
	→ tiin57 joined	19:44
	← mud left	19:45
	← irc_user left	19:46
	→ bamdad_ joined	19:47
	← bamdad left	19:47
	← theoceaniscool left	19:48
	← pikapika left	19:50
	← acetakwas left	19:50
	→ pikapika joined	19:51
	→ acetakwas joined	19:52
	← jmejias left	19:54
cahoots	j416, got it, ty	19:55
	→ cdown joined	19:56
shailangsa	how did you find the https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/misc/+archive/refs/tags/android-7.1.2_r29/linux-x86/flex.tar.gz link?	19:57
	→ irc_user joined	19:57
cahoots	j416, another q, forgetting the --shallow-since restriction, how can i shallow-clone to a specific commit (as opposed to a branch or tag)? i've run `git config --global uploadpack.allowReachableSHA1InWant true` but still not sure what to do	19:58
j416	shailangsa: with my eyes	19:59
	→ Noldorin joined	19:59
	→ inkbottle joined	20:00
	→ matelot joined	20:00
	← zebrag left	20:00
	← Maxattax left	20:02
	← zumba_addict left	20:03
dermoth	Jookia, wait, I was in #git all along? sorry for the spam!	20:04
	it was meant got the urxvt channel :/	20:04
j416	dermoth: :D	20:05
	we try our best.	20:06
	← ekh left	20:10
	→ Betal joined	20:10
	← tiin57 left	20:12
	→ tiin57 joined	20:16
	→ Lucas_Gray joined	20:24
	← sunova left	20:26
	← alesan left	20:27
	← F0rTex left	20:27
	← cahoots left	20:28
	→ zumba_addict joined	20:29
	→ m0viefreak joined	20:30
	→ mir100 joined	20:33
	← mirrorbird left	20:36
	→ mirrorbird joined	20:36
	← cosimone left	20:39
	← gxt left	20:39
	← stormsz left	20:40
	→ cosimone joined	20:41
	→ smitop joined	20:43
	→ gxt joined	20:46
	→ Cb-Mc joined	20:47
	← crose left	20:47
	→ crose joined	20:49
	← arcatech left	20:49
	← zumba_addict left	20:49
	← Technodrome left	20:51
	← Cb-Mc left	20:53
	← crose left	20:53
	← jim left	20:54
	← feriman left	20:55
	→ tafa2 joined	20:56
	→ zumba_addict joined	20:57
	← zumba_addict left	21:03
	→ jim joined	21:05
	← dupondje left	21:06
	← gpanders left	21:12
	→ alesan joined	21:13
	→ jaziz joined	21:14
	← tiin57 left	21:15
	→ arcatech joined	21:15
	← ninjin_ left	21:17
	→ mud joined	21:17
	→ ninjin_ joined	21:17
	→ g00s joined	21:17
	→ F0rTex joined	21:18
	← jim left	21:21
	→ virmaha joined	21:24
	→ jim joined	21:32
	← cdown left	21:34
	← Kaivo left	21:34
	→ Kaivo joined	21:37
	← Darcidride left	21:39
	← imp left	21:42
	→ dupondje joined	21:44
	← alesan left	21:45
	→ alesan joined	21:45
	→ mat001_ joined	21:53
	← Narrat left	21:56
	→ zumba_addict joined	21:57
	← rafasc left	21:57
	← mat001 left	21:57
	← tpaper left	21:59
	← nikivi left	21:59
	→ tpaper joined	22:00
	→ nikivi joined	22:00
	→ Mattiaslndstrm joined	22:00
	← zumba_addict left	22:01
	← Mattiaslndstrm left	22:03
	← CodeSlingerPaul left	22:03
	← POQDavid left	22:03
	← pikapika left	22:04
	→ POQDavid joined	22:04
	← acetakwas left	22:04
	→ pikapika joined	22:05
	← mud left	22:05
	← jstein left	22:05
	→ acetakwas joined	22:05
	← dionysus69 left	22:06
	→ sdwrage joined	22:07
	← m0viefreak left	22:08
	← nikivi left	22:09
	← acetakwas left	22:09
	← pikapika left	22:09
	→ nikivi joined	22:10
	→ pikapika joined	22:10
	→ acetakwas joined	22:11
	← pikapika left	22:12
	← acetakwas left	22:12
	← nikivi left	22:12
	→ pikapika joined	22:13
	→ acetakwas joined	22:13
	→ nikivi joined	22:13
	→ Muimi joined	22:16
	← Muimi left	22:16
	← calcul0n_ left	22:16
	← irc_user left	22:16
	← alesan left	22:17
	→ zumba_addict joined	22:17
	→ ash_worksi joined	22:18
ash_worksi	I started a new project that looks a lot like an old project; I just want to commit it to the same repo; is there a way I can just get the .git folder for that repo and then just have it remove/add everything and call version2 ?	22:20
	it*	22:20
	or is that a bad idea?	22:20
	← zumba_addict left	22:22
	→ austin987 joined	22:25
	gitinfo set mode: +v	22:26
	← virmaha left	22:27
	→ meLon joined	22:28
austin987	hi there; I'm on git-2.28.0; is there a way to use the -U feature of git diff (lines of unified diff to show) with git commit -p (partial commit)? I.e., I want to run `git commit -p`, but I need more diff context lines to see what I'm doing	22:30
	git commit doesn't accept -U, and I don't see anything similar in the help	22:30
	→ yonder joined	22:31
	← leeN left	22:32
	→ mat001 joined	22:32
	← sdwrage left	22:33
	→ mowcat joined	22:34
	← mat001_ left	22:36
	→ zumba_addict joined	22:38
	→ mckendricks joined	22:40
	← zumba_addict left	22:43
	→ budonyc joined	22:52
	→ zumba_addict joined	22:54
	← justanotheruser left	22:55
	→ justanotheruser joined	22:55
	← zumba_addict left	22:59
	→ Xenguy joined	23:03
	← cosimone left	23:04
	← vdamewood left	23:06
	→ Beta joined	23:12
	← Betal left	23:12
	→ cosimone joined	23:17
	← gast0n left	23:22
	→ maxzor joined	23:23
	← opal left	23:24
mackerman	ash_worksi: If you are going to re-add everything, don't bother deleting. Edit the changelog and metadata to call it version 2, and git tag it as such.	23:34
	← matelot left	23:36
	→ opal joined	23:37
	→ alesan joined	23:38
	← vngx left	23:42
	→ AnAverageHuman joined	23:45
	← mckendricks left	23:45
	← acetakwas left	23:46
	→ acetakwas joined	23:47
	← ash_worksi left	23:47
	← nikivi left	23:47
	→ nikivi joined	23:48
	← AnAverageHuman left	23:53

Logs Search ←Prev date Next date→

Channels Documentation