IRCloggy #git 2022-01-24

Logs Search ←Prev date Next date→ Channels Documentation

Provider of IRC logs since 2005.
WARNING: As Freenode became unjoinable and lost all warnings in topics, we cannot log channels on Freenode anymore.

2022-01-24

xx left00:00
hseg left00:11
hseg joined00:12
pretty_dumm_guy left00:12
karstensrage joined00:16
karstensrage left00:17
karstensrage joined00:17
nickdiazswag209 joined00:17
nickdiazswag209 left00:23
dextercd left00:24
IguanaBob left00:24
thiago left00:25
thiago joined00:28
ethrl joined00:29
vakera_pingveno left00:29
xiongxin joined00:32
ethrl left00:34
nickdiaz1wag209 joined00:38
Soni joined00:40
nickdiaz1wag209 left00:43
XV8 left00:43
DoofusCanadensis joined00:45
goldfish left00:46
walterwhip left00:50
ghost43_ joined00:54
walterwhip joined00:54
furrymcgee left00:55
cbreak joined00:56
nickdiazswag209 joined00:56
jstein left00:57
AbleBacon joined00:58
rgrinberg joined00:58
kaiseisei joined01:00
nickdiazswag209 left01:02
rgrinberg left01:03
xiongxin left01:08
Soni does git tend to kill hooks if they take too long or something?01:10
gco left01:11
Murr left01:17
Murr joined01:17
irc_user left01:24
xiongxin joined01:24
kaiseisei left01:25
pretty_dumm_guy joined01:25
pretty_dumm_guy left01:25
kaiseisei joined01:26
pretty_dumm_guy joined01:27
vicfred joined01:27
xiongxin1 joined01:34
hseg left01:35
xiongxin left01:36
xiongxin1xiongxin01:36
xiongxin left01:39
WingTillDie left01:44
WingTillDie joined01:45
m0viefreak left01:47
XV8 joined01:51
WingTillDie left01:51
walterwhip left01:53
Soni nvm the thing's getting oom_killed :D01:54
vysn joined01:54
WingTillDie joined02:01
tyson2 left02:01
ano left02:05
ano joined02:07
tyson2 joined02:09
Guest38 joined02:10
GNUmoon left02:18
GNUmoon joined02:19
walterwhip joined02:21
ano left02:21
eXtr3m0 left02:24
ano joined02:25
rgrinberg joined02:27
ano left02:32
skapata left02:34
Yruama left02:34
ano joined02:35
skapata joined02:36
rgrinberg left02:37
yagamilito joined02:38
ano left02:38
yagamilito left02:39
ano joined02:40
vicfred_ joined02:41
vicfred left02:44
jazzy2 joined02:45
rgrinberg joined02:45
nickdiaz1wag209 joined02:59
Gustavo6046 left03:00
Gustavo6046 joined03:00
dvanloon left03:01
dvanloon joined03:01
nickdiaz1wag209 left03:05
saroy joined03:07
pretty_dumm_guy left03:09
ferdna joined03:12
FinnElija left03:16
finn_elija joined03:16
finn_elijaFinnElija03:16
lemonsnicks joined03:17
Murr left03:17
Murr joined03:17
yagamilito joined03:21
maryo joined03:25
pabogr left03:25
SteveR joined03:30
SteveR Hi there, i deleted a file from my master branch in github ui03:30
how do i revert that commit or undo my action03:30
Guest38 left03:31
Guest38 joined03:32
cdown_ joined03:34
irc_user joined03:36
SteveR or how can i revert a commit in git03:36
cdown left03:36
cdown_cdown03:37
avu SteveR: git revert03:37
SteveR git revert <somecommitid>03:37
avu SteveR: yes03:38
vakera_pingveno joined03:38
vysn left03:38
SteveR git status now says Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 1 commit.03:38
do i need to do a git push03:38
avu SteveR: yes. revert creates a new commit reverting the changes of the previous commit03:38
so you have to push that new commit like any other if you want the remote to have it03:39
SteveR i get this now kex_exchange_identification: write: Protocol wrong type for socket03:39
Please make sure you have the correct access rights03:39
and the repository exists.03:39
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.03:39
avu SteveR: have a look at `git remote show <the-remote-you-are-trying-to-push-to>` and see if there's something wrong there03:40
also make sure the right public key is on GH if you're using ssh03:40
SteveR avu i did ssh -T [email@hidden.address]03:40
and then i did a git push03:40
it succeeded03:40
wolfdale joined03:42
sotired left03:43
hbautista joined03:43
dre left03:53
saroybytehackr03:53
bbju joined03:55
bbju left03:56
SteveR left04:00
kaiseisei left04:04
keypusher left04:11
sudoforge joined04:12
maryo left04:12
gco joined04:13
vinleodvdamewood04:14
llh left04:15
Ranhir joined04:15
RanhirRanhir|NotHere04:16
Ranhir|NotHereRanhir04:16
bin101 joined04:16
walterwhip left04:17
maryo joined04:23
jjakob left04:26
jjakob joined04:26
vicfred_ left04:29
euidzero joined04:38
cdown left04:39
maryo left04:43
mar77i left04:45
kaiseisei joined04:45
murii joined04:46
jazzy3 joined04:50
murii left04:51
jazzy2 left04:54
nyah left05:00
nickdiaz1wag209 joined05:00
vakera_pingveno left05:06
zebrag left05:11
hbautista left05:18
great_taste left05:25
jazzy3 left05:30
robbat2 sitaramc: is there something in the docs missing to disable a VREF after it was enabled by a wildcard?05:33
repo foo/..* - VREF/myvref = @all05:33
repo foo/test - VREF/myvref = nil05:33
wanting to disable the vref for the specific repo, but keep it on the regex set05:34
gco left05:34
madewokherd` joined05:38
madewokherd left05:40
andypandy joined05:40
Xaldafax left05:46
yagamilito left05:49
srinidhi left05:55
WingTillDie left05:56
sv0 joined05:56
DoofusCanadensis left05:59
bloody left05:59
Thanatermesis left06:00
tyson2 left06:01
subopt left06:10
mexen joined06:10
srinidhi joined06:13
GNUmoon2 joined06:14
mw_ left06:15
GNUmoon left06:18
zmt00 left06:24
thiago left06:25
Gustavo6046_ joined06:35
Gustavo6046_ left06:37
Gustavo6046_ joined06:37
Gustavo6046Guest558006:37
Guest5580 left06:37
Gustavo6046_Gustavo604606:37
murii joined06:41
Vonter joined06:43
maryo joined06:45
murii left06:46
gast0n left06:46
crashrep left06:49
rgrinberg left06:56
maryo87 joined06:58
maryo left06:59
carl- joined07:04
GNUmoon2 left07:06
mw_ joined07:07
mihael joined07:15
mihael left07:16
mihael joined07:16
mihael left07:17
mihael joined07:17
xx joined07:18
jazzy joined07:24
iomari891 joined07:28
bkircher joined07:30
Gustavo6046 left07:35
AnapodoPsalidaki joined07:35
skapata left07:40
spare joined07:41
Gustavo6046 joined07:44
zulutango joined07:44
geowiesnot joined07:46
coot joined07:52
coot left07:55
GNUmoon2 joined07:55
coot joined07:55
vdamewood left07:57
Vonter left07:57
bkircher left08:00
bkircher joined08:00
bkircher left08:00
luke-jr left08:01
pyeveryt_ left08:01
palasso joined08:02
ferdna left08:02
Vonter joined08:02
luke-jr joined08:03
unluckyshrubbery left08:04
bkircher joined08:06
rfuentess joined08:09
vdamewood joined08:11
aLeSD joined08:12
feriman joined08:17
walterwhip joined08:25
aLeSD left08:27
vimal joined08:31
kaiseisei left08:40
kaiseisei joined08:41
AnapodoPsalidi joined08:42
DibbTubberOne joined08:42
mihael left08:43
Guest38 left08:43
maryo87 left08:45
Sulky joined08:45
AnapodoPsalidaki left08:45
Sulky_ joined08:47
Sulky left08:49
aminvakil joined08:50
Sulky__ joined08:58
Sulky_ left09:00
Gaboradon joined09:00
Sulky joined09:01
carl- left09:02
Sulky__ left09:03
mannequin joined09:04
mar77i joined09:05
Ilyu joined09:05
carl- joined09:07
duxsco joined09:08
rsx joined09:08
jazzy left09:11
jazzy joined09:12
carl-- joined09:13
carl- left09:13
EvilDMP joined09:15
TheCatBehemoth joined09:19
iomari891 left09:21
vdamewood left09:22
feriman left09:24
Ilyu left09:26
treefrob left09:28
duxsco left09:30
keypusher joined09:33
fercell joined09:35
feriman joined09:35
EvilDMP left09:38
pretty_dumm_guy joined09:38
EvilDMP joined09:39
kernelspace hi, question: i have a kernel repo without history (gitshallow), that has been started from a linux-ti repo. Would like to find out from what commit it was started, knowing the original repo. IS there any trick ?09:40
kenanmarasli joined09:41
treefrob joined09:41
maryo87 joined09:41
furrymcgee joined09:42
iomari891 joined09:43
walterwhip left09:46
none1365 joined09:49
sv0 left09:49
polyphem_ joined09:49
none1365 github desktop or sourcetree?09:49
osse kernelspace: if it's shallow I think the commit you're looking for is just the first one of your repo09:50
polyphem left09:51
none1365 left09:51
unluckyshrubbery joined09:52
MajorBiscuit joined09:56
AbleBacon left10:00
eXtr3m0 joined10:02
Akiva left10:05
___nick___ joined10:06
Yruama joined10:08
coot left10:08
Gustavo6046 left10:11
Gustavo6046 joined10:11
drogas joined10:15
EvilDMP left10:20
wolfdale left10:22
wolfdale joined10:23
Gustavo6046 left10:29
Gustavo6046 joined10:29
Gurkenglas joined10:29
Vonter left10:32
Vonter joined10:36
fling joined10:40
FH_thecat joined10:42
maryo87 left10:43
Lord_of_Life left10:46
Lord_of_Life joined10:48
tehenderz left10:51
tehenderz joined10:52
XV9 joined10:55
XV8 left10:58
Gustavo6046_ joined11:00
EvilDMP joined11:00
Gustavo6046 left11:00
Gustavo6046_Gustavo604611:00
Gustavo6046 left11:02
coot joined11:02
hololeap left11:03
geowiesnot left11:06
srinidhi left11:09
furrymcgee left11:13
FH_thecat left11:14
Sulky left11:25
Sulky joined11:25
spare left11:25
spare joined11:26
srinidhi joined11:26
perrierjouet left11:28
maryo87 joined11:31
sudoforge left11:34
kenanmarasli left11:34
maryo_87 joined11:36
Gurkenglas left11:38
drogas left11:39
maryo87 left11:39
HumanG33k left11:39
walterwhip joined11:39
vishal left11:41
vishal joined11:42
geowiesnot joined12:02
walterwhip left12:04
walterwhip joined12:04
murii joined12:05
feriman left12:10
perrierjouet joined12:13
walterwhip left12:14
node1 joined12:16
XV9 left12:18
lunix00 joined12:19
unluckyshrubbery left12:19
XV8 joined12:20
unluckyshrubbery joined12:20
tyson2 joined12:20
kernelspace osse: eeh, no. :( some few commits has been added on original stuff so hash is not meaningful12:24
nedbat It seems that with "git branch" I can specify --merged multiple times, and it finds me branches merged into any of the commits, not branches merged into all the commits. But the help doesn't make this clear. Have I understood it correctly?12:24
node1 left12:26
Guest9086 joined12:31
cdown joined12:36
rsx left12:36
osse nedbat: I had to dig in the code, but I am about 87% certain that it checks for merged into ALL commits, not *any* commit.12:43
I like how I changed emphasis from using uppercase to using asterisks mid-sentence.12:44
tulpa_ joined12:44
irc_user left12:44
lunix00 left12:46
rsx joined12:49
lunix00 joined12:50
chenqisu1 left12:52
lunix00 left12:54
nedbat osse: hmm, i'll have to do a more careful check12:59
jinsun the notes section here seems to say otherwise https://git-scm.com/docs/git-branch13:01
When combining multiple --merged and --no-merged filters, only references that are reachable from at least one of the --merged commits and from none of the --no-merged commits are shown.13:01
bkhl_ joined13:03
bkhl_bkhl13:05
kaiseisei left13:12
crabbedhaloablut left13:12
crabbedhaloablut joined13:12
dsrt^ left13:13
dzho left13:20
dzho joined13:20
kernelspace is it ok gitk as basic/light graphic tool ? or there is something better ?13:22
aindilis joined13:28
moti86 joined13:32
moti86 left13:33
vdamewood joined13:37
Ilyu joined13:38
dminuoso You must decide for yourself.13:47
maxzor_ joined13:47
dminuoso In my long experience I found that most git interfaces are extremely lacking or just too much in the way13:47
Except magit.13:48
(magit is so good at this in fact, it made me switch from vim to emacs)13:49
Walex2 dminuoso: at the same time for most users "lacking" is a benefit...13:49
Assault joined13:50
Assault hi all. How could I achieve something like this? https://snipboard.io/BgyK48.jpg13:50
osse kernelspace: if the initial commit of the repo you have is a modified kernel then there is no good way to go about it. find the commit that has the smallest diff13:51
Assault I have been reading about submodules and subtrees, but they a) seem quite complex and b) they seem to be suitable to inject the entire repo into another repo. I would just need one subfolder from the the source repo13:51
osse Assault: if not for the "other files and folders" in the SDK repo I think submodules would be a near-perfect match13:54
unmanbearpig joined13:56
dminuoso Walex2: It's not just about being all-powerful, but it's ergonomic and fits the git flow13:57
And it doesn't hide what git does.13:57
Assault osse, yeah thats the thing...i do NOT want to include the "other files and folders"13:57
in the utilizing repos13:57
dminuoso I've experienced a variety of UIs that try and pretend some SVN like interfaced in the most simplified form. And on the slightest problem you are suddenly forced back to git, while having no experience to the mental model13:57
osse Assault: yeeah I get that. with submodules it's just not possible13:57
if those are relatively small in terms of total size then I wouldn't care about it.13:58
I don't know enough about subtrees to compare.13:58
Assault osse, i see....I was thinking what if I spit the SDK repo into two - there would be a repo for actual SDK folder and another for everything else outside of it (having the SDK folder in git ignore for the outer folder)14:00
bloody joined14:01
geowiesnot left14:03
frojnd How would I get files from previous commit? To checkout previous commit?14:05
nyah joined14:07
frojnd git checkout HEAD~114:09
Xenguy left14:10
bbju joined14:13
RiFo left14:15
ephemer0l joined14:16
RiFo joined14:17
otisolsen70 joined14:23
Vonter left14:29
anaveragehuman joined14:30
Ilyu left14:31
EvilDMP left14:32
Ilyu joined14:32
EvilDMP joined14:33
Assault left14:35
clime joined14:37
great_taste joined14:39
Thanatermesis joined14:43
bkhl left14:45
maxzor_ left14:50
nelubit left14:52
nelubit joined14:52
Guest14 joined14:58
Guest14 Hey everyone, I am a web developer and I want to start contributing to git. Can anyone tell me how to go about it15:00
subopt joined15:00
Guest14 I know git, javascript, c++15:01
Guest14: :]15:01
mackerman !contributing15:04
gitinfo Want to improve git? Everything you need to know is in http://git.io/SubmittingPatches. See !list for more on the mailing list15:04
bremner Guest14: generally I recommend finding some issue that bugs you personally and work on that.15:05
dminuoso Or finding someone that pays you to fix/implement something can do wonders as well.15:06
bremner sure, but IRC is probably not the best place to find consulting work15:07
dminuoso You'd be surprised. :)15:07
Guest14 thank you : )15:09
gh34 joined15:09
Guest9086 left15:12
Guest14 left15:13
Murr left15:17
jstein joined15:17
jstein left15:17
Murr joined15:17
infl00p4 joined15:17
Ilyu left15:17
DibbTubberOne left15:18
Ilyu joined15:18
anaveragehuman left15:22
coot left15:22
tehenderz left15:25
bkhl joined15:26
tehenderz joined15:26
widp joined15:26
widp I have a huge mono rep with lots of commits, how do I clone from only say the last n commits and only a few branches?15:27
dminuoso widp: specify --depth15:27
Also consult --filter15:28
widp Is git 'sparse checkout' similar?15:29
dminuoso Not quite15:29
clime I am getting: fatal: Unable to create '/home/clime/vizorbot/.git/index.lock': File exists.15:30
Another git process seems to be running in this repository, e.g.15:30
widp I guess that is filtering out directories15:30
I'll check those out, thanks dminuoso15:30
clime this is from `git stash create` command ^ is there a way to atomically wait until the lock is realeased? i.e. somehow tell git...wait for the lock?15:30
dminuoso widp: Consider the form `--filter=sparse:oid=<blob-ish>`15:32
maryo_87 left15:32
dminuoso See https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt15:32
anaveragehuman joined15:32
dminuoso https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt#L883-L93115:32
lunix00 joined15:34
widp let me elaborate on my problem a bit more :-15:36
thiago joined15:36
madewokherd joined15:36
widp So I use eclipse which is launched via citrix, within eclipse I access a git repo in a shared drive15:36
the shared drive is also accessble to me without citrix.15:37
The repo is a huge monorepo, I can't run git status on the shared drive, it takes a long time.15:37
jazzy left15:37
widp git operations are somewhat better if I have a git repo locally instead of the shared drive.15:38
BtbN That's just what happens with poor choices like huge monorepos15:38
dminuoso widp: Use a sparse checkout then15:38
mackerman Shared how, SMB, NFS ?15:38
dminuoso Though the combination of a huge monorepo, citrix, eclipse and apparently a centralized git repo...15:39
I'd say you're deep in the list of poor decisions already15:39
widp I am not sure I think it's a "mapped network drive"15:39
lunix00 left15:39
widp does that make sense.15:39
dminuoso widp: What's wrong with just copying that repo onto a local drive and operating on that?15:40
Seems much saner15:40
madewokherd` left15:40
widp Yeah, that's what I have been doing.15:40
mackerman If Windows, probably SMB.15:40
widp yes windows.15:40
dminuoso: I am trying to set that local repo with eclipse, just wondering if it will hurt eclipse performance now.15:41
because eclipse runs via citrix.15:41
dminuoso widp: Can I ask something out of curiosity?15:41
BtbN What does "runs via citrix" even mean15:42
dminuoso Is there some company mandate that gives you some eclipse supplied via citrix working on a centralized (presumably even shared?) repo?15:42
Or where does this come from?15:42
BtbN Isn't Citrix remote desktop stuff?15:42
dminuoso Yeah.15:43
Well citrix has other products too15:43
BtbN How is that involved with Eclipse and git then?15:43
dminuoso Conceivably your employer could provide your workstation as a thinclient, which connects via citrix receiver - and then the IT dept would have an eclipse installation in your windows profile.15:44
widp because citrix has apps I can launch from a website.15:44
dminuoso It's still the same thing though15:44
widp These apps are not normal desktop apps.15:44
vitali64 joined15:44
mackerman Does local repo mean git is on the citirx server or your workstation?15:44
dminuoso widp: If I understand it right, its still sort of remote desktop stuff behind the scenes15:45
mackerman The former may perform well, the later probably not.15:45
widp dminuoso: yes , exactly as you understand it.15:45
but I don't have regular remote desktop access.15:45
dminuoso Except the window on your local machine corresponds just to the remote application15:45
Rather than a full windows desktop15:45
I hate citrix with a passion. :)15:45
Sulky left15:49
widp Yeah, me too. but compared to 10 years ago with a similar setup, things seem to be better.15:49
Xaldafax joined15:49
widp dminuoso: how did you guess I needed filter15:50
hbautista joined15:51
widp the last 10 commits seem to be 250 MB, so I guess it's more than just text files.15:51
structoha joined15:54
mat001 joined15:57
maryo_87 joined16:01
coot joined16:01
structoha left16:03
RiFo left16:04
causasui joined16:06
DoofusCanadensis joined16:06
nihilazo joined16:07
tulpa_ left16:07
Maxattax joined16:07
nihilazo hi, I'm looking for recommendations for an open source git GUI on linux. Any recommendations? There seem to be a lot out there16:08
imMute nihilazo: git-gui and gitk are my go-tos.16:08
nihilazo thanks, I'll check them out16:10
carl--- joined16:15
nattiestnate joined16:16
carl-- left16:17
mackerman nihilazo: https://git-scm.com/downloads/guis/ take your pick16:18
kenanmarasli joined16:19
nihilazo the reason why I asked was because there's so many on that page mackerman16:21
I'll try git-gui and gitk for a bit because I already had them without realising16:21
Maxattax left16:25
Maxattax joined16:27
node1 joined16:35
structoha joined16:35
DoofusCanadensis nihilazo: the topic used to include a comment that many in this channel just use git on the command line16:37
widp` joined16:37
nihilazo yeah, I understand that just using git on the command line is common16:37
I just prefer guis personally16:37
DoofusCanadensis I use various GUIs myself because I'm responsible for training non-developers and a GUI makes that way easier16:38
widp left16:40
widp` My repo is actually 4 GB16:41
I still don't understand sparse checkout16:41
do I still clone the entire repo?16:42
structoha left16:43
madewokherd left16:43
OnlineCop joined16:48
duxsco joined16:54
mackerman git clone --filter=blob:none # will skip downloading files until needed16:54
pyevery__ joined16:56
rsx left16:58
skapata joined16:58
skapata left16:58
skapata joined16:58
nattiestnate left16:59
zmt00 joined17:02
BSaboia_ joined17:03
crashrep joined17:10
hseg joined17:13
cvmn joined17:13
nihilazo left17:14
bbju left17:18
maryo_87 left17:19
spare left17:20
m0viefreak joined17:20
IsoLinCHiP joined17:20
IsoLinCHiP Hi. Does anyone by chance have a link to a howto or good name describing the following scenario, as I am struggling to find anything on the web with my search terms. I have inherited a few projects from people not familiar with RCS tools, that have versioned their files by appending a date timestamp to the regular file. For my own sanity I'd like to convert this into a git history.17:23
jstein joined17:25
DoofusCanadensis that's probably a manual process. take the oldest file and strip the timestamp, git commit it with a comment mentioning the original timestamp. take the next oldest file and strip the timestamp replacing the one you committed... repeat until caught up17:29
geowiesnot joined17:30
___nick___ left17:31
OMGOMG just loop through a range of dates, strip the timestamp and commit for each date17:31
remember to take a backup17:31
IsoLinCHiP Was hoping to avoid anything toooo manual ;-)17:31
DoofusCanadensis ^ that one is good17:32
Sulky joined17:32
DoofusCanadensis I tend to think manually but yeah, you could loop to automate17:32
mackerman Some date reformatting is necessary, unless they happen to have ISO 8601 timestamps already.17:32
___nick___ joined17:32
___nick___ left17:32
IsoLinCHiP I looks like the dates line up with the mtime from stat, so thats a bones.17:33
bonus*17:33
___nick___ joined17:34
IsoLinCHiP Is there a commandline option to influence as which name a file is commited? Im dreading to have to constantly rename the timestampted files to their basename17:35
mackerman Find out if the file name or the mtime is correct.17:35
spare joined17:35
OMGOMG IsoLinCHiP: why are you dreading that?17:35
mat001 left17:36
Guest5375 joined17:36
IsoLinCHiP Possibly irrational. It feels like Im going to mess that up easily or have to put too many checks in place17:37
mackerman Backup the data first.17:37
OMGOMG IsoLinCHiP: what do the files look like?17:38
IsoLinCHiP Meant more like the script running amock acros my entire filesystem because of a silly typo. ;)17:38
vitali64 left17:39
spare left17:39
IsoLinCHiP Sometime basename170405.rb sometime basename.rb.20160530 . So Ill obviously have to make a few passes with different input patterns17:39
spare joined17:40
IsoLinCHiP (annoyingly even within the same project they differ *sigh*)17:40
XV8 left17:40
XV8 joined17:41
joel` joined17:43
mackerman Humans will not be consistent about what they name things.17:44
Guest5375 (using git 2.30.2) I noticed `git pull --dry-run` only shows what `git fetch` would do, but not what a subsequent `git merge` would do. Can others confirm this unexpected behavior?17:44
bytehackr left17:49
bytehackr joined17:50
schuelermine[m] After I’ve done a shallow clone, how can I pull more commits?17:51
MajorBiscuit left17:51
irc_user joined17:53
rgrinberg joined17:56
NoiseEee joined17:59
NoiseEee hi folks, is there a way to see what the server-side hooks are from a cloned repo?18:00
qpdb joined18:02
yagamilito joined18:02
DoofusCanadensis not from the cloned repo... you'd have to be able to log into the server to see the hooks on repos stored there18:03
m0viefreak left18:03
NoiseEee interesting18:04
is that a privacy-based issue/decision?18:05
i can see where it would be very helpful to know what the server-side hooks are...18:05
cbreak schuelermine[m]: do you still have access to the remote?18:05
schuelermine[m] yes18:05
I gues18:05
it is still online18:05
cbreak you can try man git-fetch, search for --deepen18:05
gitinfo the git-fetch manpage is available at https://gitirc.eu/git-fetch.html18:05
Assault joined18:06
cbreak or even --unshallow, if you want to make it a normal repo18:06
mat001 joined18:07
bytehackr left18:09
rfuentess left18:11
mat001 left18:12
hololeap joined18:13
yagamilito left18:14
Betal joined18:14
NoiseEee left18:15
madewokherd joined18:17
geowiesnot left18:18
Zaliek joined18:21
Ilyu left18:21
Akiva joined18:22
Sulky left18:22
polyphem_polyphem18:24
ano left18:26
pyevery__ left18:26
unluckyshrubbery left18:26
unluckyshrubbery joined18:26
ano joined18:29
geowiesnot joined18:31
GNUmoon2 left18:38
sudoforge joined18:48
IsoLinCHiP Ok, seems I was able to wire up git hash-object, git update-index and git commit to commit a file of my chosing under a manually edited filename to the history.18:59
Put the original filename and the date in the commit message. Then when Im done adding the files I can rebase -i to reorder them correctly. Should be good enough (TM)19:00
iomari891 left19:00
lgc joined19:04
lgc left19:04
AbleBacon joined19:06
ano left19:09
ano joined19:09
vakera_pingveno joined19:14
cvmn left19:15
hseg left19:15
Ilyu joined19:17
mooz left19:19
Erisa joined19:20
mooz joined19:24
Ilyu left19:25
Erisa left19:25
samgranieri joined19:25
Erisa joined19:25
Erisa left19:26
Erisa joined19:26
Erisa left19:26
Erisa joined19:27
Erisa left19:27
Erisa joined19:27
Erisa left19:28
Ilyu joined19:31
pyevery__ joined19:37
lotharn joined19:42
coot left19:43
IsoLinCHiP One question though about the update-index --cacheinfo option. The mode that is specified there is longer than I am normally used to seeing in unix file paths. I cant find out what the leading 100 stands for in 100644.19:43
lotharn trying to upload about 500mb of files, largest 10-15 mb. getting fatal: the remote end hung up unexpectedly19:44
what do?19:44
already tried increasing the buffer...19:44
maybe not the right buffer19:44
Gaboradon Hello19:45
Would it be possible to copy rich text from git diff --color and paste as HTML for forums ?19:46
gh34 left19:47
bkircher left19:48
bket left19:50
bket joined19:53
hseg joined19:56
ph88 joined19:57
ph88 is it possible to show lines added/removed per commit with git log ?19:57
ikke --stat20:01
nickdiaz1wag209 left20:03
Shentino left20:15
node1 left20:15
vakera_pingveno left20:17
TheCatBehemoth left20:19
toma joined20:20
toma left20:21
toma joined20:21
spare left20:22
spare joined20:22
rgrinberg left20:23
ThorMojito joined20:24
Sulky joined20:25
FinnElija left20:25
madewokherd left20:25
FinnElija joined20:26
XV8 left20:27
Assault left20:29
lotharn apparently the answer is smaller chunks20:30
XV8 joined20:30
Strom left20:35
Strom joined20:36
vicfred joined20:37
bodiccea joined20:39
BSaboia_ left20:40
Milijus joined20:42
tyson2 left20:42
hseg left20:45
GNUmoon2 joined20:50
rgrinberg joined20:53
KnowledgeShark left20:55
BSaboia_ joined20:58
BSaboia_ left20:59
bernard__ joined20:59
bernard__ left20:59
polyphem_ joined21:00
polyphem left21:00
polyphem_polyphem21:01
madewokherd joined21:01
ThorMojito left21:02
___nick___ left21:04
carl--- left21:04
hseg joined21:04
ThorMojito joined21:07
murii left21:09
j416 Gaboradon: technically possible, you just need a tool for it21:12
Gaboradon: try to find something that can convert "ansi colors" to html21:14
AnapodoPsalidi left21:14
otisolsen70 left21:14
AnapodoPsalidaki joined21:15
pyevery__ left21:15
pyevery__ joined21:16
pyevery__ left21:20
coot joined21:22
murii joined21:22
GNUmoon2 left21:23
mz` joined21:25
vakera_pingveno joined21:25
ThorMojito left21:27
murii left21:27
murii joined21:27
engblom left21:29
jelmer left21:30
lrngystdlted^ joined21:38
YuGiOhJCJ joined21:41
tyson2 joined21:45
shush Weirdest thing is happening: I added a remote that is a fork of my project `git remote add remotename https://github.com/...` and then I fetched, and created a local branch of the remote's branch `git checkout -b localcopy remotename/somebranch` and what happens next will blow you away! The localcopy branch is a single commit on top of a massive commit that looks like a squash of the entire history of the main branch dated December 31st21:47
1969 (perhaps -1 unix timestamp?).21:47
What the actual bean flick could make this happen?21:48
pyeveryt_ joined21:56
kenanmarasli left22:00
tulpa_ joined22:08
ThorMojito joined22:09
tirnanog joined22:09
GNUmoon2 joined22:10
jelmer joined22:10
coot left22:11
shush Anyone have an idea what would cause this?22:12
IsoLinCHiP shush: Only Idea I have is, you might have accidentally made a shallow clone? Did you use --depth or --shallow-since or something like that? If its not that I dont know22:15
yagamilito joined22:20
toma left22:24
shush Perhaps my VSCode github plugin made a shallow clone22:24
spare left22:24
pyeveryt_ left22:24
shush I'm also thinking that perhaps some sort of cache of the latest commit is preventing me from retrying without the shallow clone22:25
duxsco left22:25
shush How can I look under the hood of the commit object for the branch in order to "clear this cache" so to speak?22:25
Dereferencing the commit by deleting the branch wont get me there22:26
vakera_pingveno left22:26
Shentino joined22:26
eXtr3m0 left22:26
eXtr3m0 joined22:27
Shentino left22:27
GlitterCooper joined22:29
YuGiOhJCJ left22:29
YuGiOhJCJ joined22:29
durham_ joined22:32
Shentino joined22:34
Guest5375 left22:34
durham left22:35
durham_ left22:35
ThorMojito left22:35
durham joined22:36
shush Looks like `git prune --dry-run --verbose` does not include the commit which I want pruned, and this may be because of the reference exists in the reflog. Is it safe to just remove the items in the reflog and try again?22:36
vysn joined22:38
rgrinberg left22:38
shush Looks like reflog items are linked together (link list?), so modifying the HEAD log might not be as simple as deleting a couple of lines22:40
jstein left22:40
ThorMojito joined22:41
rgrinberg joined22:42
szkl left22:42
xx left22:44
anaveragehuman left22:46
geowiesnot left22:47
ThorMojito left22:47
austin987 left23:01
pizdets_ left23:03
hololeap left23:03
samgranieri left23:03
pizdets joined23:03
austin987 joined23:04
austin987 left23:11
hololeap joined23:14
causasui left23:19
geowiesnot joined23:20
YuGiOhJCJ left23:22
YuGiOhJCJ joined23:25
causasui joined23:27
causasui left23:31
palasso left23:33
causasui joined23:36
causasui left23:40
Xenguy joined23:41
junebug joined23:47
junebug left23:48
junebug joined23:48
bgs left23:49
durham_ joined23:55
durham left23:58

Logs Search ←Prev date Next date→ Channels Documentation